Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM diffusion study group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 2—Ex vivo imaging: Added value and acquisition

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1002/mrm.30435
Kurt G. Schilling, Francesco Grussu, Andrada Ianus, Brian Hansen, Amy F. D. Howard, Rachel L. C. Barrett, Manisha Aggarwal, Stijn Michielse, Fatima Nasrallah, Warda Syeda, Nian Wang, Jelle Veraart, Alard Roebroeck, Andrew F. Bagdasarian, Cornelius Eichner, Farshid Sepehrband, Jan Zimmermann, Lucas Soustelle, Christien Bowman, Benjamin C. Tendler, Andreea Hertanu, Ben Jeurissen, Marleen Verhoye, Lucio Frydman, Yohan van de Looij, David Hike, Jeff F. Dunn, Karla Miller, Bennett A. Landman, Noam Shemesh, Adam Anderson, Emilie McKinnon, Shawna Farquharson, Flavio Dell'Acqua, Carlo Pierpaoli, Ivana Drobnjak, Alexander Leemans, Kevin D. Harkins, Maxime Descoteaux, Duan Xu, Hao Huang, Mathieu D. Santin, Samuel C. Grant, Andre Obenaus, Gene S. Kim, Dan Wu, Denis Le Bihan, Stephen J. Blackband, Luisa Ciobanu, Els Fieremans, Ruiliang Bai, Trygve B. Leergaard, Jiangyang Zhang, Tim B. Dyrby, G. Allan Johnson, Julien Cohen-Adad, Matthew D. Budde, Ileana O. Jelescu
{"title":"Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM diffusion study group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 2—Ex vivo imaging: Added value and acquisition","authors":"Kurt G. Schilling,&nbsp;Francesco Grussu,&nbsp;Andrada Ianus,&nbsp;Brian Hansen,&nbsp;Amy F. D. Howard,&nbsp;Rachel L. C. Barrett,&nbsp;Manisha Aggarwal,&nbsp;Stijn Michielse,&nbsp;Fatima Nasrallah,&nbsp;Warda Syeda,&nbsp;Nian Wang,&nbsp;Jelle Veraart,&nbsp;Alard Roebroeck,&nbsp;Andrew F. Bagdasarian,&nbsp;Cornelius Eichner,&nbsp;Farshid Sepehrband,&nbsp;Jan Zimmermann,&nbsp;Lucas Soustelle,&nbsp;Christien Bowman,&nbsp;Benjamin C. Tendler,&nbsp;Andreea Hertanu,&nbsp;Ben Jeurissen,&nbsp;Marleen Verhoye,&nbsp;Lucio Frydman,&nbsp;Yohan van de Looij,&nbsp;David Hike,&nbsp;Jeff F. Dunn,&nbsp;Karla Miller,&nbsp;Bennett A. Landman,&nbsp;Noam Shemesh,&nbsp;Adam Anderson,&nbsp;Emilie McKinnon,&nbsp;Shawna Farquharson,&nbsp;Flavio Dell'Acqua,&nbsp;Carlo Pierpaoli,&nbsp;Ivana Drobnjak,&nbsp;Alexander Leemans,&nbsp;Kevin D. Harkins,&nbsp;Maxime Descoteaux,&nbsp;Duan Xu,&nbsp;Hao Huang,&nbsp;Mathieu D. Santin,&nbsp;Samuel C. Grant,&nbsp;Andre Obenaus,&nbsp;Gene S. Kim,&nbsp;Dan Wu,&nbsp;Denis Le Bihan,&nbsp;Stephen J. Blackband,&nbsp;Luisa Ciobanu,&nbsp;Els Fieremans,&nbsp;Ruiliang Bai,&nbsp;Trygve B. Leergaard,&nbsp;Jiangyang Zhang,&nbsp;Tim B. Dyrby,&nbsp;G. Allan Johnson,&nbsp;Julien Cohen-Adad,&nbsp;Matthew D. Budde,&nbsp;Ileana O. Jelescu","doi":"10.1002/mrm.30435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The value of preclinical diffusion MRI (dMRI) is substantial. While dMRI enables in vivo non-invasive characterization of tissue, ex vivo dMRI is increasingly being used to probe tissue microstructure and brain connectivity. Ex vivo dMRI has several experimental advantages including higher SNR and spatial resolution compared to in vivo studies, and enabling more advanced diffusion contrasts for improved microstructure and connectivity characterization. Another major advantage of ex vivo dMRI is the direct comparison with histological data, as a crucial methodological validation. However, there are a number of considerations that must be made when performing ex vivo experiments. The steps from tissue preparation, image acquisition and processing, and interpretation of results are complex, with many decisions that not only differ dramatically from in vivo imaging of small animals, but ultimately affect what questions can be answered using the data. This work represents “Part 2” of a three-part series of recommendations and considerations for preclinical dMRI. We describe best practices for dMRI of ex vivo tissue, with a focus on the value that ex vivo imaging adds to the field of dMRI and considerations in ex vivo image acquisition. We first give general considerations and foundational knowledge that must be considered when designing experiments. We briefly describe differences in specimens and models and discuss why some may be more or less appropriate for different studies. We then give guidelines for ex vivo protocols, including tissue fixation, sample preparation, and MR scanning. In each section, we attempt to provide guidelines and recommendations, but also highlight areas for which no guidelines exist (and why), and where future work should lie. An overarching goal herein is to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of ex vivo dMRI acquisitions and analyses, and thereby advance biomedical knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":"93 6","pages":"2535-2560"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mrm.30435","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mrm.30435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The value of preclinical diffusion MRI (dMRI) is substantial. While dMRI enables in vivo non-invasive characterization of tissue, ex vivo dMRI is increasingly being used to probe tissue microstructure and brain connectivity. Ex vivo dMRI has several experimental advantages including higher SNR and spatial resolution compared to in vivo studies, and enabling more advanced diffusion contrasts for improved microstructure and connectivity characterization. Another major advantage of ex vivo dMRI is the direct comparison with histological data, as a crucial methodological validation. However, there are a number of considerations that must be made when performing ex vivo experiments. The steps from tissue preparation, image acquisition and processing, and interpretation of results are complex, with many decisions that not only differ dramatically from in vivo imaging of small animals, but ultimately affect what questions can be answered using the data. This work represents “Part 2” of a three-part series of recommendations and considerations for preclinical dMRI. We describe best practices for dMRI of ex vivo tissue, with a focus on the value that ex vivo imaging adds to the field of dMRI and considerations in ex vivo image acquisition. We first give general considerations and foundational knowledge that must be considered when designing experiments. We briefly describe differences in specimens and models and discuss why some may be more or less appropriate for different studies. We then give guidelines for ex vivo protocols, including tissue fixation, sample preparation, and MR scanning. In each section, we attempt to provide guidelines and recommendations, but also highlight areas for which no guidelines exist (and why), and where future work should lie. An overarching goal herein is to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of ex vivo dMRI acquisitions and analyses, and thereby advance biomedical knowledge.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ISMRM扩散研究组对临床前弥散MRI的考虑和建议:第2部分-离体成像:附加价值和获取。
临床前弥散MRI (dMRI)的价值是实质性的。虽然dMRI能够在体内无创地表征组织,但离体dMRI越来越多地用于探测组织微观结构和大脑连接。与体内研究相比,离体dMRI具有几个实验优势,包括更高的信噪比和空间分辨率,并且能够实现更先进的扩散对比,以改善微观结构和连通性表征。离体dMRI的另一个主要优势是与组织学数据的直接比较,作为关键的方法学验证。然而,在进行离体实验时,必须考虑一些因素。从组织准备,图像采集和处理到结果解释的步骤是复杂的,其中许多决定不仅与小动物体内成像有很大不同,而且最终影响使用数据可以回答的问题。这项工作代表了临床前dMRI的三部分系列建议和考虑的“第2部分”。我们描述了体外组织dMRI的最佳实践,重点是体外成像对dMRI领域的价值和体外图像采集的考虑。我们首先给出设计实验时必须考虑的一般考虑和基础知识。我们简要地描述了标本和模型的差异,并讨论了为什么有些可能或多或少适用于不同的研究。然后,我们给出了离体方案的指导方针,包括组织固定,样品制备和MR扫描。在每个部分中,我们试图提供指导方针和建议,但也强调没有指导方针存在的领域(以及为什么),以及未来的工作应该在哪里。本文的首要目标是提高离体dMRI采集和分析的严谨性和可重复性,从而推进生物医学知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
期刊最新文献
Modeling the Intermediate Flow Regime in Flow-Compensated Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI. On-Scanner Correction of Gradient Nonlinearity Bias for Accurate Assessment of Diffusion Heterogeneity Across Bone Sites in Myelofibrosis Patients. An Open-Source Software Toolbox for Rapid Radiofrequency Coil Design and Evaluation in MRI. Relaxivity of Gadobutrol and Gadoteric Acid in Cerebrospinal Fluid at 3T. Quantitative Comparison of Multi-Echo Spin Echo and Multi-Echo Gradient Echo Myelin Water Imaging in a Panel of Mbp Enhancer-Edited Mouse Lines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1