Does high compliance with the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol improve 5-year survival? A cohort study of 468 nonmetastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Magdalena Pisarska-Adamczyk, Karolina Zawadzka, Grzegorz Torbicz, Urszula Popiela, Piotr Małczak, Michał Wysocki, Piotr Major, Mateusz Rubinkiewicz
{"title":"Does high compliance with the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol improve 5-year survival? A cohort study of 468 nonmetastatic colorectal cancer patients.","authors":"Magdalena Pisarska-Adamczyk, Karolina Zawadzka, Grzegorz Torbicz, Urszula Popiela, Piotr Małczak, Michał Wysocki, Piotr Major, Mateusz Rubinkiewicz","doi":"10.20452/pamw.16960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Well‑documented immediate benefits of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol highlight the need to explore its long‑term impact, particularly on survival outcomes in colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of the ERAS protocol compliance on the long‑term outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal resection.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data from 468 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection between 2013 and 2017 were prospectively collected. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on their adherence to the ERAS protocol, that is, group 1 with a compliance rate below 80% and group 2 with a compliance rate of 80% or higher. The association between the ERAS protocol compliance and 5‑year survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log‑rank tests. Additionally, a survival analysis was performed separately for groups depending on cancer stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group 1 consisted of 128 patients, while the group 2 included 340 individuals. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists scale, or comorbidities. The Kaplan-Meier curve and log‑rank test analyses indicated that the 2 groups of ERAS protocol adherence did not significantly differ in terms of 5‑year overall survival. In the patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage 1-2, those with ERAS compliance of 80% or higher had a significantly better 5‑year survival rate than those with compliance below 80%, indicating that greater adherence to the ERAS protocol is associated with improved survival outcomes. In the case of AJCC stage 3 patients, the ERAS compliance did not significantly alter survival rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High adherence to the ERAS protocol appeared to improve the 5‑year survival rate in the patients with AJCC stage 1-2 colorectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":49680,"journal":{"name":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej-Polish Archives of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej-Polish Archives of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.16960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Well‑documented immediate benefits of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol highlight the need to explore its long‑term impact, particularly on survival outcomes in colorectal cancer.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of the ERAS protocol compliance on the long‑term outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal resection.
Patients and methods: Data from 468 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection between 2013 and 2017 were prospectively collected. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on their adherence to the ERAS protocol, that is, group 1 with a compliance rate below 80% and group 2 with a compliance rate of 80% or higher. The association between the ERAS protocol compliance and 5‑year survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log‑rank tests. Additionally, a survival analysis was performed separately for groups depending on cancer stages.
Results: The group 1 consisted of 128 patients, while the group 2 included 340 individuals. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists scale, or comorbidities. The Kaplan-Meier curve and log‑rank test analyses indicated that the 2 groups of ERAS protocol adherence did not significantly differ in terms of 5‑year overall survival. In the patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage 1-2, those with ERAS compliance of 80% or higher had a significantly better 5‑year survival rate than those with compliance below 80%, indicating that greater adherence to the ERAS protocol is associated with improved survival outcomes. In the case of AJCC stage 3 patients, the ERAS compliance did not significantly alter survival rates.
Conclusion: High adherence to the ERAS protocol appeared to improve the 5‑year survival rate in the patients with AJCC stage 1-2 colorectal cancer.
期刊介绍:
Polish Archives of Internal Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed periodical issued monthly in English as an official journal of the Polish Society of Internal Medicine. The journal is designed to publish articles related to all aspects of internal medicine, both clinical and basic science, provided they have practical implications. Polish Archives of Internal Medicine appears monthly in both print and online versions.