Improving the Infrastructure for Pediatric Medical Device Trials at Children's Hospitals.

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1542/peds.2024-066974
Juan C Espinoza, Grzegorz Zapotoczny, Kolaleh Eskandanian, Joshua Dienstman, R Brandon Hunter, Robert Levy, Michael Harrison, Hanmin Lee, Chester J Koh
{"title":"Improving the Infrastructure for Pediatric Medical Device Trials at Children's Hospitals.","authors":"Juan C Espinoza, Grzegorz Zapotoczny, Kolaleh Eskandanian, Joshua Dienstman, R Brandon Hunter, Robert Levy, Michael Harrison, Hanmin Lee, Chester J Koh","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-066974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The shortage of novel pediatric devices that accommodate the unique needs of children exists due to several scientific, clinical, regulatory, and financial barriers. This global unmet need is being addressed in the United States by multiple stakeholders including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and its Pediatric Device Consortia (PDC) grant program. One critical area of interest is the suboptimal medical device clinical trial infrastructure that currently exists in academic medical centers and compounded at children's hospitals. Although pediatric drug clinical trial infrastructure is often well developed at many children's hospitals, these capabilities do not necessarily translate to pediatric device trials. The chief challenge to address is the recognition of differences in conducting device vs drug trials. We need to shift the paradigm by introducing best practices and a set of tools and job aids to assist the stakeholders of device trials at children's hospitals. Pediatric medical device clinical trial support has unique infrastructure needs and barriers compared to trials carried out of adult medical devices and drugs. Well-coordinated cross-sector collaboration is needed to advance the state of pediatric medical devices. To assess these gaps and challenges, surveys and interviews were conducted with key leaders at each of the children's hospitals primarily associated with the 5 FDA-supported PDCs. Reviews of pediatric device clinical trials were performed at each institution with the goal of identifying the common denominators and specifics of best practices, challenges, and areas of improvement for conducting and supporting pediatric device trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-066974","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The shortage of novel pediatric devices that accommodate the unique needs of children exists due to several scientific, clinical, regulatory, and financial barriers. This global unmet need is being addressed in the United States by multiple stakeholders including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and its Pediatric Device Consortia (PDC) grant program. One critical area of interest is the suboptimal medical device clinical trial infrastructure that currently exists in academic medical centers and compounded at children's hospitals. Although pediatric drug clinical trial infrastructure is often well developed at many children's hospitals, these capabilities do not necessarily translate to pediatric device trials. The chief challenge to address is the recognition of differences in conducting device vs drug trials. We need to shift the paradigm by introducing best practices and a set of tools and job aids to assist the stakeholders of device trials at children's hospitals. Pediatric medical device clinical trial support has unique infrastructure needs and barriers compared to trials carried out of adult medical devices and drugs. Well-coordinated cross-sector collaboration is needed to advance the state of pediatric medical devices. To assess these gaps and challenges, surveys and interviews were conducted with key leaders at each of the children's hospitals primarily associated with the 5 FDA-supported PDCs. Reviews of pediatric device clinical trials were performed at each institution with the goal of identifying the common denominators and specifics of best practices, challenges, and areas of improvement for conducting and supporting pediatric device trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完善儿童医院儿科医疗器械试验基础设施。
由于一些科学、临床、监管和财政方面的障碍,适应儿童独特需求的新型儿科器械短缺。在美国,包括食品和药物管理局(FDA)及其儿科器械协会(PDC)资助计划在内的多个利益相关者正在解决这一全球未满足的需求。我们感兴趣的一个关键领域是目前存在于学术医疗中心和儿童医院的次优医疗设备临床试验基础设施。虽然许多儿童医院的儿科药物临床试验基础设施通常都很发达,但这些能力并不一定能转化为儿科设备试验。要解决的主要挑战是认识到进行设备试验与药物试验的差异。我们需要通过引入最佳做法和一套工具和工作辅助工具来改变这种模式,以协助儿童医院设备试验的利益相关者。与成人医疗器械和药物的临床试验相比,儿科医疗器械临床试验支持具有独特的基础设施需求和障碍。需要良好协调的跨部门合作来推进儿科医疗器械的状况。为了评估这些差距和挑战,我们对主要与fda支持的5家儿科医院相关的每家儿童医院的主要负责人进行了调查和访谈。在每个机构进行儿科器械临床试验的回顾,目的是确定进行和支持儿科器械试验的共同点和最佳实践的细节、挑战和改进领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
期刊最新文献
An Electronic Health Record-Based Tobacco Treatment System for Parents in Pediatric Primary Care. Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Vitamin C Deficiency Is Rapidly Reversible. The Impact of Socioeconomic Status and Different Treatment Modalities on Children With Faltering Weight: Technical Report. Speech Auditory Brainstem Response to Predict Language Delay. The Benefits and Harms of Endoscopy and Other Diagnostic Tests to Detect Underlying Conditions in Children With Faltering Weight: Technical Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1