Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Brazilian Public Health System: A single center experience.

Guilherme Pinheiro Machado, Pedro Castilhos Crivelaro, Gustavo Neves de Araujo, Alan Pagnoncelli, Julia Silva, Camila Porto, Wagner Azevedo, Rodrigo Petersen Saadi, Eduardo Keller Saadi, Orlando Wender, Marco Wainstein, Felipe Costa Fuchs
{"title":"Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Brazilian Public Health System: A single center experience.","authors":"Guilherme Pinheiro Machado, Pedro Castilhos Crivelaro, Gustavo Neves de Araujo, Alan Pagnoncelli, Julia Silva, Camila Porto, Wagner Azevedo, Rodrigo Petersen Saadi, Eduardo Keller Saadi, Orlando Wender, Marco Wainstein, Felipe Costa Fuchs","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been established as the treatment of choice for severe aortic stenosis in high risk as well as patients above 75 years-old in all risk spectrums. Despite its worldwide adoption, implementation in lower-middle-income countries such as Brazilian public health system (SUS, acronym in Portuguese) is incipient.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate TAVI exclusively within SUS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was prospective cohort study in a public tertiary hospital in southern Brazil. All patients who underwent TAVI between 2018 and 2024 were included. The cohort was divided into two temporal periods: from July 2018 to December 2022 (n=60) and January 2023 to October 2024 (n=65). The clinical and procedural characteristics and in-hospital as well as 1 year of outcomes were evaluated according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 125 patients underwent TAVI. The average age was 80 years (± 10), 49.6% were male. The mean aortic valve area was 0.76 cm2 and the mean gradient was 45 (±13) mmHg. The mean STS predicted risk of mortality (STS-PROM) score was 4.6% (±3.6). Device success was achieved in 119 patients (95.2%). In-hospital mortality was 2 (1.6%). New permanent pacemaker was required in 16 (12.8%). Demographic and clinical characteristics between the first and the second periods were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mortality and complications rate of TAVI performed within the scope of the Brazilian public health system were consistent with the clinical experience of other international registries.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been established as the treatment of choice for severe aortic stenosis in high risk as well as patients above 75 years-old in all risk spectrums. Despite its worldwide adoption, implementation in lower-middle-income countries such as Brazilian public health system (SUS, acronym in Portuguese) is incipient.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate TAVI exclusively within SUS patients.

Methods: This was prospective cohort study in a public tertiary hospital in southern Brazil. All patients who underwent TAVI between 2018 and 2024 were included. The cohort was divided into two temporal periods: from July 2018 to December 2022 (n=60) and January 2023 to October 2024 (n=65). The clinical and procedural characteristics and in-hospital as well as 1 year of outcomes were evaluated according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) criteria.

Results: During the study period, 125 patients underwent TAVI. The average age was 80 years (± 10), 49.6% were male. The mean aortic valve area was 0.76 cm2 and the mean gradient was 45 (±13) mmHg. The mean STS predicted risk of mortality (STS-PROM) score was 4.6% (±3.6). Device success was achieved in 119 patients (95.2%). In-hospital mortality was 2 (1.6%). New permanent pacemaker was required in 16 (12.8%). Demographic and clinical characteristics between the first and the second periods were similar.

Conclusions: The mortality and complications rate of TAVI performed within the scope of the Brazilian public health system were consistent with the clinical experience of other international registries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Pathways in Cardiology
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Critical Pathways in Cardiology provides a single source for the diagnostic and therapeutic protocols in use at hospitals worldwide for patients with cardiac disorders. The Journal presents critical pathways for specific diagnoses—complete with evidence-based rationales—and also publishes studies of these protocols" effectiveness.
期刊最新文献
Exploratory Analysis of Urine PO 2 Peri-Procedural Kinetics and CI-AKI Prognostic Abilities in Patients Undergoing PCI. The Impact of a High Sensitivity Troponin HEART Pathway-Based Clinical Decision Protocol on Observation Visits. Coronary Perforation Occurring During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Associated With Persistently High Mortality and Complications. Unlocking the Potential of the HEART Pathway: Predicting MACE and Facilitating Nurse-Physician Collaboration in Chest Pain Unit. Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1