Investigation of cooling methods and efficiency of firefighters wearing protective clothing after heat exposure.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1080/10803548.2025.2452761
Chenyi Zheng, Jun Li, Yun Su, Mingxi Zhao, Xianghui Zhang
{"title":"Investigation of cooling methods and efficiency of firefighters wearing protective clothing after heat exposure.","authors":"Chenyi Zheng, Jun Li, Yun Su, Mingxi Zhao, Xianghui Zhang","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2025.2452761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives.</i> This study aimed to evaluate four cooling methods (natural cooling method [NCM], stripping cooling method [SCM], fan cooling method [FCM] and water-spray cooling method [WSCM]) for their effectiveness in reducing heat stress and skin burns in firefighters after heat exposure. <i>Methods</i>. Skin heat flow and fabric temperature were measured on a stored energy test device during the exposure and cooling stages. The study assessed thermal protective performance by comparing the cooling methods, noting the time to second-degree burns and the energy released to the skin. <i>Results</i>. The SCM showed the best thermal protective performance, followed by the FCM, NCM and WSCM. No skin burns were observed with the SCM. Compared to the NCM, the FCM extended the time to second-degree burns by 3.2% (F1 fabric system) and 10.7% (F2 fabric system). The SCM had the lowest accumulated energy released to the skin and the highest cooling efficiency. The accumulated stored energy and released energy of the FCM decreased with increasing wind speed, whereas the values for the WSCM increased with longer water spray durations. These results can guide the development of optimal cooling methods to enhance firefighter safety and protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"494-503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2025.2452761","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. This study aimed to evaluate four cooling methods (natural cooling method [NCM], stripping cooling method [SCM], fan cooling method [FCM] and water-spray cooling method [WSCM]) for their effectiveness in reducing heat stress and skin burns in firefighters after heat exposure. Methods. Skin heat flow and fabric temperature were measured on a stored energy test device during the exposure and cooling stages. The study assessed thermal protective performance by comparing the cooling methods, noting the time to second-degree burns and the energy released to the skin. Results. The SCM showed the best thermal protective performance, followed by the FCM, NCM and WSCM. No skin burns were observed with the SCM. Compared to the NCM, the FCM extended the time to second-degree burns by 3.2% (F1 fabric system) and 10.7% (F2 fabric system). The SCM had the lowest accumulated energy released to the skin and the highest cooling efficiency. The accumulated stored energy and released energy of the FCM decreased with increasing wind speed, whereas the values for the WSCM increased with longer water spray durations. These results can guide the development of optimal cooling methods to enhance firefighter safety and protection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消防员热暴露后穿着防护服的冷却方法和效率的调查。
目标。本研究旨在评估四种冷却方法(自然冷却法[NCM]、剥离冷却法[SCM]、风扇冷却法[FCM]和喷水冷却法[WSCM])对减少消防员热暴露后热应激和皮肤烧伤的效果。方法。在一个储能测试装置上测量了暴露和冷却阶段的皮肤热流和织物温度。该研究通过比较冷却方法来评估热防护性能,注意到二度烧伤的时间和释放到皮肤的能量。结果。SCM的热防护性能最好,其次是FCM、NCM和WSCM。SCM未观察到皮肤烧伤。与NCM相比,FCM将二度烧伤时间延长了3.2% (F1织物体系)和10.7% (F2织物体系)。单片机有最低的累积能量释放到皮肤和最高的冷却效率。FCM累积蓄能和释放能随风速的增大而减小,而WSCM累积蓄能和释放能随喷水时间的延长而增大。这些结果可以指导最佳冷却方法的开发,以提高消防员的安全和保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
期刊最新文献
Choice of cold weather combat clothing affects manual performance, body temperatures and comfort in a sub-Arctic climate. Analysis of the effects of individual characteristics, safety training and awareness of dockers on occupational accidents using accident causality models. A method of cyber risk assessment for occupational risk in machinery. Development and characterization of sustainable safety gloves manufactured from recycled para-aramid blends. DFMEA-based risk mitigation and validation of a controlled descent rescue device.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1