Inhibition of ErbB2 mitigates secondary denervation after traumatic muscle injury

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Physiology-London Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1113/JP287435
Jacob R. Sorensen, Daniel B. Hoffman, Christiana J. Raymond-Pope, Thomas J. Lillquist, Amanda M. Russell, Benjamin T. Corona, Sarah M. Greising
{"title":"Inhibition of ErbB2 mitigates secondary denervation after traumatic muscle injury","authors":"Jacob R. Sorensen,&nbsp;Daniel B. Hoffman,&nbsp;Christiana J. Raymond-Pope,&nbsp;Thomas J. Lillquist,&nbsp;Amanda M. Russell,&nbsp;Benjamin T. Corona,&nbsp;Sarah M. Greising","doi":"10.1113/JP287435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <div>Secondary denervation has recently been described as part of the sequela of volumetric muscle loss (VML) injury, occurring along with a significantly elevated neurotrophic response, specifically neuregulin-1 (NRG1). This may contribute to chronic functional impairments associated with the injury, representing an overlooked treatment target. Thus, though paradoxical, the goal of this study was to pharmacologically reduce neurotrophic signalling after VML using a monoclonal antibody (Herceptin) that inhibits ErbB2 receptors. We also assessed whether ErbB2 inhibition combined with a myogenic treatment (i.e. minced muscle graft) would have a synergistically beneficial effect on function. Adult male Lewis rats underwent surgical induction of tibialis anterior muscle VML injury and were randomized into one of four groups: VML untreated, VML Herceptin, VML muscle graft and VML muscle graft + Herceptin, with comparisons to the contralateral (uninjured) control muscle. Rats receiving Herceptin were administered the drug (8 mg/kg <span>i.p.</span>) at the time of surgery and thrice per week for the duration of the study (48 days). Terminally individual NMJs were quantitatively evaluated, and maximal <i>in vivo</i> torque was tested. ErbB2 inhibition fully restored the normal rates of NMJ innervation and morphology after VML injury, and improved innervation of <i>de novo</i> myofibres after a muscle-graft treatment. However ErbB2 inhibition did not improve skeletal muscle function alone or in combination with a muscle-graft treatment. We conclude that ErbB2 inhibition is a promising therapeutic option for treating VML injury, yet more work is needed to optimize the translation of improved NMJ characteristics to recover function.\n\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key points</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>In cases of complex traumatic musculoskeletal injury, such as volumetric muscle loss (VML), the endogenous ability of skeletal muscle to regenerate and recover function is lost.</li>\n \n <li>Innervation, or the connection of a motor axon to each individual myofibre, is a necessary component of myofibre survival and contractile function, which is disrupted after VML.</li>\n \n <li>Paradoxically a monocolonal antibody inhibitor of neurotrophic signalling (receptor tyrosine kinase ErbB2; Herceptin) has been shown to improve regeneration in rodent models of nerve injury.</li>\n \n <li>Here we show that pharmaceutical ErbB2 inhibition following a rat model of VML improves muscle innervation; however it did not correspondingly recover muscle function.</li>\n \n <li>Although ErbB2 inhibition alone is an ineffective treatment for VML injury, its ability to improve innervation is noteworthy and should be considered as an adjunctive or combinatorial therapy option.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":"603 23","pages":"7531-7548"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1113/JP287435","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP287435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Secondary denervation has recently been described as part of the sequela of volumetric muscle loss (VML) injury, occurring along with a significantly elevated neurotrophic response, specifically neuregulin-1 (NRG1). This may contribute to chronic functional impairments associated with the injury, representing an overlooked treatment target. Thus, though paradoxical, the goal of this study was to pharmacologically reduce neurotrophic signalling after VML using a monoclonal antibody (Herceptin) that inhibits ErbB2 receptors. We also assessed whether ErbB2 inhibition combined with a myogenic treatment (i.e. minced muscle graft) would have a synergistically beneficial effect on function. Adult male Lewis rats underwent surgical induction of tibialis anterior muscle VML injury and were randomized into one of four groups: VML untreated, VML Herceptin, VML muscle graft and VML muscle graft + Herceptin, with comparisons to the contralateral (uninjured) control muscle. Rats receiving Herceptin were administered the drug (8 mg/kg i.p.) at the time of surgery and thrice per week for the duration of the study (48 days). Terminally individual NMJs were quantitatively evaluated, and maximal in vivo torque was tested. ErbB2 inhibition fully restored the normal rates of NMJ innervation and morphology after VML injury, and improved innervation of de novo myofibres after a muscle-graft treatment. However ErbB2 inhibition did not improve skeletal muscle function alone or in combination with a muscle-graft treatment. We conclude that ErbB2 inhibition is a promising therapeutic option for treating VML injury, yet more work is needed to optimize the translation of improved NMJ characteristics to recover function.

Key points

  • In cases of complex traumatic musculoskeletal injury, such as volumetric muscle loss (VML), the endogenous ability of skeletal muscle to regenerate and recover function is lost.
  • Innervation, or the connection of a motor axon to each individual myofibre, is a necessary component of myofibre survival and contractile function, which is disrupted after VML.
  • Paradoxically a monocolonal antibody inhibitor of neurotrophic signalling (receptor tyrosine kinase ErbB2; Herceptin) has been shown to improve regeneration in rodent models of nerve injury.
  • Here we show that pharmaceutical ErbB2 inhibition following a rat model of VML improves muscle innervation; however it did not correspondingly recover muscle function.
  • Although ErbB2 inhibition alone is an ineffective treatment for VML injury, its ability to improve innervation is noteworthy and should be considered as an adjunctive or combinatorial therapy option.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抑制 ErbB2 可减轻创伤性肌肉损伤后的继发性神经支配。
继发性去神经支配最近被描述为体积性肌肉损失(VML)损伤的后遗症的一部分,伴随着神经营养反应的显著升高,特别是神经调节蛋白-1 (NRG1)。这可能导致与损伤相关的慢性功能损伤,这是一个被忽视的治疗目标。因此,尽管矛盾,本研究的目的是使用抑制ErbB2受体的单克隆抗体(赫赛汀)从药理学上减少VML后的神经营养信号。我们还评估了ErbB2抑制与肌源性治疗(即切碎的肌肉移植)是否会对功能产生协同有益的影响。成年雄性Lewis大鼠手术诱导胫骨前肌VML损伤,随机分为四组:VML未治疗组、VML赫赛汀组、VML肌肉移植组和VML肌肉移植+赫赛汀组,并与对侧(未损伤)对照肌进行比较。接受赫赛汀的大鼠在手术时给药(8mg /kg i.p.),在研究期间(48天)每周给药3次。最后对单个NMJs进行了定量评估,并测试了最大体内扭矩。ErbB2抑制完全恢复了VML损伤后NMJ的正常神经支配率和形态学,并改善了肌肉移植后新生肌纤维的神经支配。然而,ErbB2抑制不能单独或联合肌肉移植治疗改善骨骼肌功能。我们得出结论,ErbB2抑制是治疗VML损伤的一种有希望的治疗选择,但需要更多的工作来优化改善NMJ特征的翻译以恢复功能。重点:在复杂的外伤性肌肉骨骼损伤的情况下,如体积性肌肉损失(VML),骨骼肌再生和恢复功能的内源性能力丧失。神经支配,或运动轴突与每个肌纤维的连接,是肌纤维存活和收缩功能的必要组成部分,在VML后被破坏。神经营养信号受体酪氨酸激酶ErbB2的单结肠抗体抑制剂;赫赛汀(Herceptin)已被证明可以改善啮齿动物神经损伤模型的再生。本研究表明,在VML大鼠模型后,药物ErbB2抑制可改善肌肉神经支配;然而,它并没有相应地恢复肌肉功能。虽然单独抑制ErbB2对VML损伤无效,但其改善神经支配的能力值得注意,应考虑作为辅助或联合治疗的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
期刊最新文献
Maternal late gestation undernutrition in sheep is associated with increased ductus venosus shunting and reduced cerebral oxygen consumption. Transcranial photobiomodulation with near-infrared laser induces analgesia in rats. Impact of time-restricted feeding on metabolic health and adipose tissue metabolism in aged female mice with high-fat diet-induced obesity. A novel stromal cell source of RANKL during sustained osteoclast activation in disuse osteoporosis. In autonomic adaptation the details matter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1