Association of absolute amount of pattern 4 disease on prostate biopsy with oncologic outcomes in intermediate-risk prostate cancer A systematic review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI:10.5489/cuaj.8995
Melissa Sam Soon, Scott C Morgan, Luke T Lavallée, Rodney H Breau, Trevor A Flood, Mark T Corkum
{"title":"Association of absolute amount of pattern 4 disease on prostate biopsy with oncologic outcomes in intermediate-risk prostate cancer A systematic review.","authors":"Melissa Sam Soon, Scott C Morgan, Luke T Lavallée, Rodney H Breau, Trevor A Flood, Mark T Corkum","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Managing intermediate-risk prostate cancer is challenging due to the heterogeneity in patient outcomes within this risk category. Evaluating the absolute amount of Gleason pattern 4 disease (GP4) at biopsy using the total linear length of pattern 4 (GP4-TL) or absolute percentage of pattern 4 (APP4) may enhance risk stratification. This review aimed to determine if these absolute measures predict oncologic outcomes in IRPC and to identify optimal prognostic thresholds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies included were those reporting the absolute amount of GP4 on biopsy and related outcomes in IRPC patients undergoing surgery or radiotherapy. Outcomes included biochemical recurrence, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival, distant metastasis, prostate cancer-specific mortality, all-cause mortality, and adverse pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies with a total of 2523 patients were included. Analysis revealed that APP4 thresholds were highly predictive of biochemical recurrence, ADT-free survival, and distant metastasis. Both APP4 and GP4-TL were superior to relative % GP4 and Gleason grading (4+3 vs. 3+4) in predicting disease progression and mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The absolute amount of GP4 shows consistent associations with important clinical outcomes and offers an accessible and established method to enhance risk stratification. Further research is needed to define optimal thresholds to guide treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":"211-216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12158451/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8995","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Managing intermediate-risk prostate cancer is challenging due to the heterogeneity in patient outcomes within this risk category. Evaluating the absolute amount of Gleason pattern 4 disease (GP4) at biopsy using the total linear length of pattern 4 (GP4-TL) or absolute percentage of pattern 4 (APP4) may enhance risk stratification. This review aimed to determine if these absolute measures predict oncologic outcomes in IRPC and to identify optimal prognostic thresholds.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies included were those reporting the absolute amount of GP4 on biopsy and related outcomes in IRPC patients undergoing surgery or radiotherapy. Outcomes included biochemical recurrence, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival, distant metastasis, prostate cancer-specific mortality, all-cause mortality, and adverse pathology.

Results: Seven studies with a total of 2523 patients were included. Analysis revealed that APP4 thresholds were highly predictive of biochemical recurrence, ADT-free survival, and distant metastasis. Both APP4 and GP4-TL were superior to relative % GP4 and Gleason grading (4+3 vs. 3+4) in predicting disease progression and mortality.

Conclusions: The absolute amount of GP4 shows consistent associations with important clinical outcomes and offers an accessible and established method to enhance risk stratification. Further research is needed to define optimal thresholds to guide treatment decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺活检第 4 型疾病的绝对数量与中危前列腺癌的肿瘤学预后的关系:系统综述。
导言:中危前列腺癌(IRPC)的管理是具有挑战性的,因为在这一风险类别中患者的预后存在异质性。使用4型病的总线性长度(GP4- tl)或4型病的绝对百分比(APP4)评估活检时Gleason 4型病(GP4)的绝对数量可能会加强风险分层。本综述旨在确定这些绝对指标是否能预测IRPC的肿瘤预后,并确定最佳预后阈值。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。纳入的研究报告了接受手术或放疗的IRPC患者活检中GP4的绝对含量和相关结果。结果包括生化复发、无雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)生存、远处转移、前列腺癌特异性死亡率、全因死亡率和不良病理。结果:纳入7项研究,共2523例患者。分析显示,APP4阈值可高度预测生化复发、无adt生存和远处转移。在预测疾病进展和死亡率方面,APP4和GP4- tl均优于相对%GP4和Gleason分级(4+3比3+4)。结论:GP4的绝对含量与重要的临床结果具有一致的相关性,并为加强风险分层提供了一种可行且成熟的方法。需要进一步的研究来确定最佳阈值,以指导治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
期刊最新文献
Association between kidney stones and future risk of kidney cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic appraisal of emerging alternative therapies in men's health and wellness. Efficient blood testing in endourology: A Transfusion Dashboard initiative to minimize unnecessary type and screen tests. Rezūm therapy: Outcomes of symptom relief and quality of life in benign prostatic obstruction with three-year followup. Financial burden of prolonged urinary retention in patients awaiting holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in the Quebec healthcare system: A retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1