Risks of electromagnetic fields from the perspective of general practitioners and pediatricians.

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC primary care Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1186/s12875-025-02762-9
Felix Forster, Claudia Riesmeyer, Lyn Ermel, Katharina Lüthy, Ronny Jung, Tobias Weinmann
{"title":"Risks of electromagnetic fields from the perspective of general practitioners and pediatricians.","authors":"Felix Forster, Claudia Riesmeyer, Lyn Ermel, Katharina Lüthy, Ronny Jung, Tobias Weinmann","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02762-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although there is little evidence for adverse health effects due to exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) below legal limits, worries regarding these effects are relatively frequent in the general population. For many individuals, general practitioners (GPs) and pediatricians are the first point of contact with the health system. Therefore, it is essential to understand their EMF risk perception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional mixed methods study inviting 3,000 GPs and 2,000 pediatricians sampled from the German Federal Medical Registry, of which 614 (12.3%) participated in an online survey and 25 participated in focus groups. We estimated the prevalence of high risk perception, poor subjective knowledge regarding EMF, and the relevance of EMF in their everyday work correcting for non-response by Multilevel Regression and Poststratification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About a quarter of physicians indicated high risk perception regarding health and EMF. Relevance was low, with about 40% of GPs and about 20% of pediatricians reporting EMF-related consultations during the last year. About 60% of physicians had poor subjective knowledge. Many physicians said they could not rule out the possibility of adverse health effects of EMF due to insufficient knowledge and expressed a need for information to address this knowledge gap.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A substantial part of GPs and pediatricians with high risk perception are physicians with poor subjective knowledge regarding EMF who cannot completely rule out EMF below legal limits as a cause of unspecific, unclear symptoms, and who are therefore open to patients' suggestions of EMF as a potential cause.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02762-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although there is little evidence for adverse health effects due to exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) below legal limits, worries regarding these effects are relatively frequent in the general population. For many individuals, general practitioners (GPs) and pediatricians are the first point of contact with the health system. Therefore, it is essential to understand their EMF risk perception.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional mixed methods study inviting 3,000 GPs and 2,000 pediatricians sampled from the German Federal Medical Registry, of which 614 (12.3%) participated in an online survey and 25 participated in focus groups. We estimated the prevalence of high risk perception, poor subjective knowledge regarding EMF, and the relevance of EMF in their everyday work correcting for non-response by Multilevel Regression and Poststratification.

Results: About a quarter of physicians indicated high risk perception regarding health and EMF. Relevance was low, with about 40% of GPs and about 20% of pediatricians reporting EMF-related consultations during the last year. About 60% of physicians had poor subjective knowledge. Many physicians said they could not rule out the possibility of adverse health effects of EMF due to insufficient knowledge and expressed a need for information to address this knowledge gap.

Conclusions: A substantial part of GPs and pediatricians with high risk perception are physicians with poor subjective knowledge regarding EMF who cannot completely rule out EMF below legal limits as a cause of unspecific, unclear symptoms, and who are therefore open to patients' suggestions of EMF as a potential cause.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从全科医生和儿科医生的角度看电磁场的风险。
背景:虽然很少有证据表明暴露于低于法定限度的电磁场(EMF)会对健康产生不利影响,但在普通人群中,对这些影响的担忧相对频繁。对于许多人来说,全科医生和儿科医生是与卫生系统的第一个接触点。因此,了解他们的EMF风险认知是至关重要的。方法:我们进行了一项横断面混合方法研究,邀请了来自德国联邦医疗登记处的3000名全科医生和2000名儿科医生,其中614名(12.3%)参加了在线调查,25名参加了焦点小组。我们估计了高风险认知的普遍程度,关于EMF的主观知识贫乏,以及EMF在他们日常工作中的相关性,通过多水平回归和后分层来纠正无反应。结果:约四分之一的医生表示对健康和EMF有高风险认知。相关性很低,去年约有40%的全科医生和约20%的儿科医生报告了与电磁场相关的咨询。约60%的医生主观知识较差。许多医生说,由于知识不足,他们不能排除EMF对健康产生不利影响的可能性,并表示需要提供信息以弥补这一知识差距。结论:相当一部分具有高风险认知的全科医生和儿科医生是对EMF缺乏主观认识的医生,他们不能完全排除低于法律限制的EMF是导致不具体、不明确症状的原因,因此他们对患者关于EMF是潜在原因的建议持开放态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of an in-office intervention to improve general practitioners' support for tobacco smoking cessation: results from a randomised controlled trial (TABAC-PRO). How prepared are urban primary care facilities to manage hypertension and type 2 diabetes in Dhaka, Bangladesh? A cross-sectional descriptive study of government urban dispensaries and NGO clinics. Joint consultations with general practitioners and geriatric psychiatrists for older adults with depression: a focus group study. Type 2 diabetes care: knowledge and clinical practice among medical practitioners at Medical Teaching Institute Mardan, Pakistan - a cross-sectional study. Factors associated with higher cardiovascular disease risk awareness among patients with cardiovascular risk factors in primary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1