Is it necessary to use a sling or abduction pillow sling after superior rotator cuff repair? A preliminary report.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-31 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.5606/tftrd.2024.12653
İsmail Murad Pepe, Yavuz Şahbat, Emre Çalışal, Selçuk Yılmaz, İsmet Aslı Topcuoğlu, Ayça Aracı, Yıldız Erdoğanoğlu
{"title":"Is it necessary to use a sling or abduction pillow sling after superior rotator cuff repair? A preliminary report.","authors":"İsmail Murad Pepe, Yavuz Şahbat, Emre Çalışal, Selçuk Yılmaz, İsmet Aslı Topcuoğlu, Ayça Aracı, Yıldız Erdoğanoğlu","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2024.12653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the effects of the use of a shoulder sling, shoulder sling with a pillow, or not using a sling on the shoulder functional score and pain levels following arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This randomized prospective study was performed with 90 patients (49 males, 41 females; mean age: 56.2±12.2 year; range, 33 to 77 years) with a small-to-mid, full-thickness rotator cuff tear between July 2020 and October 2022. All patients underwent arthroscopic double-row repair. The nonsling group wore no sling, the sling group wore a sling, and the abduction pillow sling group wore a sling with an abduction pillow. The same rehabilitation program was performed. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Constant-Murley scores, and degrees of flexion and abduction were recorded preoperatively, on the 15<sup>th</sup> and 45<sup>th</sup> days, and at three months, six months, and one year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the 15<sup>th</sup> postoperative day, the VAS score was found to be significantly lower in the nonsling group. On the 45<sup>th</sup> day, the Constant-Murley score was found to be significantly higher in the abduction pillow sling group. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the Constant-Murley scores at three weeks, six months, and one year. The shoulder forward flexion angle was significantly lower in the nonsling group on the 45<sup>th</sup> day. There was no significant difference between the three groups in respect of the shoulder forward flexion at three months, six months, and one year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No difference was determined between the groups at the six-month and one-year functional results. Not using a sling bandage can be recommended by reducing pain in the early postoperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"70 4","pages":"486-494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11868864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.12653","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the effects of the use of a shoulder sling, shoulder sling with a pillow, or not using a sling on the shoulder functional score and pain levels following arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair.

Patients and methods: This randomized prospective study was performed with 90 patients (49 males, 41 females; mean age: 56.2±12.2 year; range, 33 to 77 years) with a small-to-mid, full-thickness rotator cuff tear between July 2020 and October 2022. All patients underwent arthroscopic double-row repair. The nonsling group wore no sling, the sling group wore a sling, and the abduction pillow sling group wore a sling with an abduction pillow. The same rehabilitation program was performed. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Constant-Murley scores, and degrees of flexion and abduction were recorded preoperatively, on the 15th and 45th days, and at three months, six months, and one year.

Results: On the 15th postoperative day, the VAS score was found to be significantly lower in the nonsling group. On the 45th day, the Constant-Murley score was found to be significantly higher in the abduction pillow sling group. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the Constant-Murley scores at three weeks, six months, and one year. The shoulder forward flexion angle was significantly lower in the nonsling group on the 45th day. There was no significant difference between the three groups in respect of the shoulder forward flexion at three months, six months, and one year.

Conclusion: No difference was determined between the groups at the six-month and one-year functional results. Not using a sling bandage can be recommended by reducing pain in the early postoperative period.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究目的该研究旨在评估使用肩部吊带、带枕肩部吊带或不使用肩部吊带对关节镜下肩袖撕裂修复术后肩部功能评分和疼痛程度的影响:这项随机前瞻性研究在 2020 年 7 月至 2022 年 10 月期间对 90 名小到中度全厚肩袖撕裂患者(49 名男性,41 名女性;平均年龄:56.2±12.2 岁;范围:33 至 77 岁)进行了研究。所有患者均接受了关节镜双排修复术。非吊带组不穿吊带,吊带组穿吊带,外展枕吊带组穿带有外展枕的吊带。采用相同的康复计划。术前、术后第15天和第45天、术后3个月、6个月和1年分别记录了视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、Constant-Murley评分、屈曲度和外展度:结果:术后第 15 天,非吊带组的 VAS 评分明显较低。在术后第 45 天,外展枕吊衣组的 Constant-Murley 评分明显更高。在三周、六个月和一年时,各组的康斯坦茨-默里评分没有明显差异。第45天时,非吊衣组的肩前屈角度明显较低。在三个月、六个月和一年时,三组之间的肩关节前屈没有明显差异:结论:各组在六个月和一年的功能结果上没有差异。建议不使用吊带绷带,以减轻术后早期的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).
期刊最新文献
Rheumatoid arthritis treatment: Is exercise a game changer? The effects of whole-body vibration exercises with and without conventional physical therapy modalities in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A prospective, randomized-controlled study. The fate of manuscripts rejected by the Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Comment to the article: Efficacy of trigger point injection therapy in noncardiac chest pain. Investigating population-based strategies to preclude falls and injuries in the elderly: A Cochrane Review summary with commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1