Normative data for the CERAD verbal episodic memory tests in a sample of older illiterate Korean women.

IF 2.8 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25424823251321750
Hyejin Ahn, Haejung Joung, Min Soo Byun, Jee Eun Park, Gijung Jung, Dahyun Yi, Dong Young Lee
{"title":"Normative data for the CERAD verbal episodic memory tests in a sample of older illiterate Korean women.","authors":"Hyejin Ahn, Haejung Joung, Min Soo Byun, Jee Eun Park, Gijung Jung, Dahyun Yi, Dong Young Lee","doi":"10.1177/25424823251321750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Verbal episodic memory tests in the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) neuropsychological battery require literacy. While modified administrations are provided for illiterate individuals, there are no norms for evaluating the performance of illiterate subjects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assessing the performance of illiterate individuals has limitations, since existing norms were developed on data from literate populations. The purpose of this study is to provide normative data for illiterate Korean older women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants analyzed in this study were all illiterate. Among a sample of 109 non-demented older adults recruited from community centers for dementia, only 9 were men. Thus, the current analysis developed norms for women. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participants' characteristics and test scores. Linear regressions were conducted to examine the effect of age on verbal episodic memory tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age was found to be significantly associated with performance on all word list tests. Age was divided into two groups based on the average value for sufficient sample size and showed a significant difference in test performance: 60-75, ≥76 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluating illiterate women using existing standards has the limitation of underestimating their performance relative to their actual skills. The present normative data are expected to enable researchers and clinicians to more accurately evaluate the results of the three verbal episodic memory tests, including the Word List Memory, Word List Recall, and Word List Recognition in older illiterate Korean women.</p>","PeriodicalId":73594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","volume":"9 ","pages":"25424823251321750"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25424823251321750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Verbal episodic memory tests in the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) neuropsychological battery require literacy. While modified administrations are provided for illiterate individuals, there are no norms for evaluating the performance of illiterate subjects.

Objective: Assessing the performance of illiterate individuals has limitations, since existing norms were developed on data from literate populations. The purpose of this study is to provide normative data for illiterate Korean older women.

Methods: The participants analyzed in this study were all illiterate. Among a sample of 109 non-demented older adults recruited from community centers for dementia, only 9 were men. Thus, the current analysis developed norms for women. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participants' characteristics and test scores. Linear regressions were conducted to examine the effect of age on verbal episodic memory tests.

Results: Age was found to be significantly associated with performance on all word list tests. Age was divided into two groups based on the average value for sufficient sample size and showed a significant difference in test performance: 60-75, ≥76 years.

Conclusions: Evaluating illiterate women using existing standards has the limitation of underestimating their performance relative to their actual skills. The present normative data are expected to enable researchers and clinicians to more accurately evaluate the results of the three verbal episodic memory tests, including the Word List Memory, Word List Recall, and Word List Recognition in older illiterate Korean women.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国老年文盲妇女CERAD言语情景记忆测试的规范性数据。
背景:在建立阿尔茨海默病(CERAD)神经心理电池注册联盟的韩文版本中,口头情景记忆测试要求有读写能力。虽然为不识字的个人提供了改进的行政管理,但没有评价不识字对象的表现的标准。目的:评估文盲个体的表现具有局限性,因为现有的规范是根据识字人口的数据制定的。本研究的目的是为不识字的韩国老年妇女提供规范性数据。方法:本研究的研究对象均为文盲。在从社区痴呆症中心招募的109名非痴呆症老年人样本中,只有9名是男性。因此,目前的分析为妇女制定了规范。描述性统计用于总结参与者的特征和测试成绩。采用线性回归来检验年龄对言语情景记忆测试的影响。结果:年龄与所有单词列表测试的表现显著相关。年龄根据样本量的平均值分为两组,60-75岁,≥76岁。结论:用现有标准评价文盲妇女存在低估其实际技能表现的局限性。目前的规范性数据有望使研究人员和临床医生能够更准确地评估韩国老年文盲妇女的三种言语情景记忆测试结果,包括词表记忆、词表回忆和词表识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Osteoporosis-mediated exacerbation of the amyloid-β pathology: Involvement of serum calcium. Baseline characteristics of patients with early Alzheimer's disease enrolled in the pivotal trial of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS-AD). Higher cerebellum florbetapir uptake in cerebral amyloid angiopathy compared to Alzheimer's disease: A dual florbetapir and FDG PET study. Pilot: Salivary lactoferrin as a potential preclinical Alzheimer's disease biomarker. Interaction of insula and hippocampus in memory dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1