Genome-wide transcriptome analysis reveals sex-specific biological differences in the early phase of an acute myocardial infarction.

Aaron Shulkin, Perman Pandal, Eliseo Vazquez, Elizabeth Jasmin Cortez-Toledo, Kwame Atsina, Tesfaye Mersha, Javier E Lopez
{"title":"Genome-wide transcriptome analysis reveals sex-specific biological differences in the early phase of an acute myocardial infarction.","authors":"Aaron Shulkin, Perman Pandal, Eliseo Vazquez, Elizabeth Jasmin Cortez-Toledo, Kwame Atsina, Tesfaye Mersha, Javier E Lopez","doi":"10.1101/2025.02.19.25322579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are known to vary between females and males; however, the nature of this sex dimorphism remains controversial. Most AMI transcriptomic studies have not considered differences between females and males, and combined sexes in their analysis to increase sample size and gain power (canonical approach). Our objective was to (1) use a sex-specific differentially expressed gene meta-analysis (ss-DEGma) in blood and (2) identify sex-specific pathways related to the early phase of AMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Gene expression data (7 sets) for sex-combined (canonical) and sex-specific analysis (ss-DEGma) were obtained from the publicly-available GEO database. Datasets from whole blood and peripheral blood cells sampled within 3 days post-AMI were analyzed using GEO2R. The massiR tool identified sex in 72% of samples. The top-ranking DEGs were used to identify significant sex-specific biological pathways in the KEGG database (FDR <0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We performed this meta-analysis in 291 women and 452 men and > 20,000 genes (see Table for identified DEGs). Sex-combined DEGs yielded 100 significant KEGG pathways. Sex-specific DEGs yielded 8/61 (13%) additional new pathways not identified by the sex-combined analysis. Sex-combined pathways were predominantly immunological (35%), while male- and female-specific pathways were 43% and 18% immunological, respectively. Proliferative and metabolic pathways were the next most represented pathways in females, which were not present in males at all.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present 8 new sex-specific AMI-related transcriptional pathways not identified in the canonical sex-combined analysis. Furthermore, we find that 53% of pathways identified in the canonical sex-combined analysis are not shared between sexes. This data underscores an urgent need for prospective sex-specific transcriptomic analysis to define the sex-specific biological difference post-AMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.19.25322579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are known to vary between females and males; however, the nature of this sex dimorphism remains controversial. Most AMI transcriptomic studies have not considered differences between females and males, and combined sexes in their analysis to increase sample size and gain power (canonical approach). Our objective was to (1) use a sex-specific differentially expressed gene meta-analysis (ss-DEGma) in blood and (2) identify sex-specific pathways related to the early phase of AMI.

Methods: Gene expression data (7 sets) for sex-combined (canonical) and sex-specific analysis (ss-DEGma) were obtained from the publicly-available GEO database. Datasets from whole blood and peripheral blood cells sampled within 3 days post-AMI were analyzed using GEO2R. The massiR tool identified sex in 72% of samples. The top-ranking DEGs were used to identify significant sex-specific biological pathways in the KEGG database (FDR <0.05).

Results: We performed this meta-analysis in 291 women and 452 men and > 20,000 genes (see Table for identified DEGs). Sex-combined DEGs yielded 100 significant KEGG pathways. Sex-specific DEGs yielded 8/61 (13%) additional new pathways not identified by the sex-combined analysis. Sex-combined pathways were predominantly immunological (35%), while male- and female-specific pathways were 43% and 18% immunological, respectively. Proliferative and metabolic pathways were the next most represented pathways in females, which were not present in males at all.

Conclusion: We present 8 new sex-specific AMI-related transcriptional pathways not identified in the canonical sex-combined analysis. Furthermore, we find that 53% of pathways identified in the canonical sex-combined analysis are not shared between sexes. This data underscores an urgent need for prospective sex-specific transcriptomic analysis to define the sex-specific biological difference post-AMI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Biorepository and Integrative Genomics resource for inclusive genomics: insights from a diverse pediatric and admixed cohort. Distress is positively associated with induced secondary hyperalgesia in people with suppressed HIV. A Qualitative Study of People with Alzheimer's Disease in a Memory Clinic Considering Lecanemab Treatment. Distinct White Matter Fiber Density Patterns in Bipolar and Depressive Disorders: Insights from Fixel-Based Analysis. Assessment of MYC Gene and WNT Pathway Alterations in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Among Hispanic/Latino Patients Using Integrated Multi-Omics Approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1