Tensions and Opportunities in Nurse, Midwife, and Peer Worker Collaborations in Healthcare Delivery: A Scoping Review and Narrative Synthesis

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1111/jan.16884
Olivia Hollingdrake, Emma Paino, Sarah Warzywoda, Aaron Akpu Philip, Judith A. Dean, Christopher Howard, Jo River
{"title":"Tensions and Opportunities in Nurse, Midwife, and Peer Worker Collaborations in Healthcare Delivery: A Scoping Review and Narrative Synthesis","authors":"Olivia Hollingdrake,&nbsp;Emma Paino,&nbsp;Sarah Warzywoda,&nbsp;Aaron Akpu Philip,&nbsp;Judith A. Dean,&nbsp;Christopher Howard,&nbsp;Jo River","doi":"10.1111/jan.16884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the published literature on nurse/midwife and peer worker collaborations in healthcare services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Scoping review and narrative synthesis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The framework proposed by Levac et al. was used. PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases were systematically searched, and results uploaded to Covidence for screening against inclusion criteria. A critical narrative synthesis of included studies was conducted, guided by Popay et al.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixteen studies from five countries met the inclusion criteria. They examined peer worker and nurse/midwife collaboration across diverse settings including cancer, HIV, mental health, and community services. Findings indicated that nurse/midwives and peer workers valued the distinct forms of expertise they contributed, which enhanced care. Tensions in collaboration related to clinical dominance and control in hierarchical structures, challenges navigating scope and role boundaries, and mistaken notions of what constitutes ‘successful’ peer work. Peer workers and nurses/midwives could be ‘close strangers’ with little opportunity to build genuine rapport.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Successful collaboration requires attention to power dynamics within healthcare cultures and opportunities to connect and understand each other's disciplinary expertise. Identifying strategies to optimise partnership and mobilise collective strengths has the potential to further enhance care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for the Profession/Patient Care</h3>\n \n <p>Peer worker or ‘lived experience’ roles within healthcare services have rapidly expanded. Our study highlights the benefits of peer worker and nurse/midwife collaborations and areas that require attention, including recognition of peer worker and nurse/midwife roles and responsibilities in the healthcare setting and effective integration of peer workers into existing healthcare teams. Importantly, strategies should be developed to address disparate power dynamics between nursing/midwifery staff and peer workers as these impact workforce relations and capability. Addressing these key areas will strengthen collaboration between nurses/midwives and peer workers, improve healthcare provision, and ultimately benefit service users.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Impact</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights the tensions arising when nurses/midwives and peer workers carry out duties alongside each other, as well as factors that can promote effective collaboration. Successful collaboration in healthcare necessitates addressing power differentials, fostering mutual understanding, and providing the tools, training, and inclusive environments needed for nurses/midwives and peer workers to work together effectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\n \n <p>This scoping review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) extension for scoping reviews.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Our authorship team includes experts with experience in peer work and supervision of peer workers, and designing and implementing peer-led interventions within health and community service settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"82 1","pages":"61-80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jan.16884","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16884","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To explore the published literature on nurse/midwife and peer worker collaborations in healthcare services.

Design

Scoping review and narrative synthesis.

Methods

The framework proposed by Levac et al. was used. PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases were systematically searched, and results uploaded to Covidence for screening against inclusion criteria. A critical narrative synthesis of included studies was conducted, guided by Popay et al.

Results

Sixteen studies from five countries met the inclusion criteria. They examined peer worker and nurse/midwife collaboration across diverse settings including cancer, HIV, mental health, and community services. Findings indicated that nurse/midwives and peer workers valued the distinct forms of expertise they contributed, which enhanced care. Tensions in collaboration related to clinical dominance and control in hierarchical structures, challenges navigating scope and role boundaries, and mistaken notions of what constitutes ‘successful’ peer work. Peer workers and nurses/midwives could be ‘close strangers’ with little opportunity to build genuine rapport.

Conclusion

Successful collaboration requires attention to power dynamics within healthcare cultures and opportunities to connect and understand each other's disciplinary expertise. Identifying strategies to optimise partnership and mobilise collective strengths has the potential to further enhance care.

Implications for the Profession/Patient Care

Peer worker or ‘lived experience’ roles within healthcare services have rapidly expanded. Our study highlights the benefits of peer worker and nurse/midwife collaborations and areas that require attention, including recognition of peer worker and nurse/midwife roles and responsibilities in the healthcare setting and effective integration of peer workers into existing healthcare teams. Importantly, strategies should be developed to address disparate power dynamics between nursing/midwifery staff and peer workers as these impact workforce relations and capability. Addressing these key areas will strengthen collaboration between nurses/midwives and peer workers, improve healthcare provision, and ultimately benefit service users.

Impact

This study highlights the tensions arising when nurses/midwives and peer workers carry out duties alongside each other, as well as factors that can promote effective collaboration. Successful collaboration in healthcare necessitates addressing power differentials, fostering mutual understanding, and providing the tools, training, and inclusive environments needed for nurses/midwives and peer workers to work together effectively.

Reporting Method

This scoping review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) extension for scoping reviews.

Patient or Public Contribution

Our authorship team includes experts with experience in peer work and supervision of peer workers, and designing and implementing peer-led interventions within health and community service settings.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士、助产士和同伴工作者在医疗服务合作中的紧张和机会:范围审查和叙述综合
探讨有关护士/助产士和同伴工作者在医疗服务中的合作的已发表文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
Mixed Methods Research on Family Caregiving for Stroke Survivors: A Methodological Systematic Review. Correlates of Mortal Distress Among Healthcare Staff in Hospitals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Is Mental Health Nursing Facing a Slow Death or Clinical Excellence and Advancement? Future Perspectives for the Flemish Context (Belgium). Factors Affecting Patient Safety Near Miss Reporting: A Systematic Review. Factors Associated With Newly Graduated Nurses' Work Engagement: Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1