Schizotypy, Psychosis Proneness, and the Polygenic Risk for Schizophrenia and Resilience

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Schizophrenia Bulletin Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbae161
Tina Meller, Clara Lundberg, Carlo Maj, Per Hoffmann, Andreas J Forstner, Markus M Nöthen, Igor Nenadić
{"title":"Schizotypy, Psychosis Proneness, and the Polygenic Risk for Schizophrenia and Resilience","authors":"Tina Meller, Clara Lundberg, Carlo Maj, Per Hoffmann, Andreas J Forstner, Markus M Nöthen, Igor Nenadić","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbae161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Hypothesis Schizotypy is a well-established phenotype for psychosis proneness and risk. Yet, its genetic underpinnings and relations to genetic bases of the schizophrenia spectrum are not well understood owing to conflicting findings. In a deep phenotyping approach, we hypothesized that genetic markers of risk for and to schizophrenia are differentially associated with (trait-level) dimensions of schizotypy and (state-level) prodromal symptoms. Study Design In 367 (130 male, 237 female) psychiatrically healthy young adults, we assessed multiple schizotypy instruments (OLIFE, SPQ-B, Multidimensional Schizotypy Scales), aggregated into composite scores, and a measure of prodromal symptoms (PQ-16). Those were tested for direct and interactive associations with the polygenic risk score (PRS) for schizophrenia and a novel PRS for resilience to schizophrenia. Study Results Both prodromal symptom number (rho = 0.16, pcorr = .018) and distress (rho = 0.14, pcorr = .027) were positively related to the schizophrenia PRS. Positive schizotypy showed a similar association but did not remain significant after correction (rho = 0.11, pcorr = .082). Schizophrenia PRS and disorganized schizotypy had a negative interactive effect on prodromal symptom distress (b = −0.10, pcorr = .048). The resilience score did not show any significant associations with any of the measures. Conclusions These results further support the idea of a (partially) shared genetic basis of schizophrenia and nonclinical, predominantly positive expressions of the psychosis spectrum but also indicate relevant distinctions between the 2, possibly related to other modulating factors or general (transdiagnostic) psychopathological risk. In line with previous findings, effects seem to be more robust for state- than trait-level markers, but these may also be influencing each other.","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbae161","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Hypothesis Schizotypy is a well-established phenotype for psychosis proneness and risk. Yet, its genetic underpinnings and relations to genetic bases of the schizophrenia spectrum are not well understood owing to conflicting findings. In a deep phenotyping approach, we hypothesized that genetic markers of risk for and to schizophrenia are differentially associated with (trait-level) dimensions of schizotypy and (state-level) prodromal symptoms. Study Design In 367 (130 male, 237 female) psychiatrically healthy young adults, we assessed multiple schizotypy instruments (OLIFE, SPQ-B, Multidimensional Schizotypy Scales), aggregated into composite scores, and a measure of prodromal symptoms (PQ-16). Those were tested for direct and interactive associations with the polygenic risk score (PRS) for schizophrenia and a novel PRS for resilience to schizophrenia. Study Results Both prodromal symptom number (rho = 0.16, pcorr = .018) and distress (rho = 0.14, pcorr = .027) were positively related to the schizophrenia PRS. Positive schizotypy showed a similar association but did not remain significant after correction (rho = 0.11, pcorr = .082). Schizophrenia PRS and disorganized schizotypy had a negative interactive effect on prodromal symptom distress (b = −0.10, pcorr = .048). The resilience score did not show any significant associations with any of the measures. Conclusions These results further support the idea of a (partially) shared genetic basis of schizophrenia and nonclinical, predominantly positive expressions of the psychosis spectrum but also indicate relevant distinctions between the 2, possibly related to other modulating factors or general (transdiagnostic) psychopathological risk. In line with previous findings, effects seem to be more robust for state- than trait-level markers, but these may also be influencing each other.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分裂型,精神病倾向,精神分裂症和恢复力的多基因风险
背景与假设精神分裂型是一种公认的精神病易感性和风险表型。然而,由于相互矛盾的发现,其遗传基础以及与精神分裂症谱系遗传基础的关系尚未得到很好的理解。在深层表型方法中,我们假设精神分裂症风险的遗传标记与精神分裂症(性状水平)维度和(状态水平)前驱症状的差异相关。研究设计在367名(130名男性,237名女性)精神健康的年轻人中,我们评估了多种分裂型工具(OLIFE, SPQ-B,多维分裂型量表),汇总成综合评分,并测量前驱症状(PQ-16)。这些测试与精神分裂症的多基因风险评分(PRS)和精神分裂症恢复力的新PRS直接和互动关联。研究结果前驱症状数(rho = 0.16, pcorr = 0.018)和痛苦程度(rho = 0.14, pcorr = 0.027)与精神分裂症PRS呈正相关。阳性分裂型也有类似的关联,但校正后不显著(rho = 0.11, pcorr = 0.082)。精神分裂症PRS和无组织分裂型对前驱症状困扰有负交互作用(b = - 0.10, pcorr = 0.048)。弹性得分与任何措施都没有显示出任何显著的关联。结论:这些结果进一步支持了精神分裂症和非临床精神病谱系阳性表达(部分)共享遗传基础的观点,但也表明两者之间存在相关差异,可能与其他调节因素或一般(跨诊断)精神病理风险有关。与先前的发现一致,状态水平的影响似乎比特质水平的影响更强,但这些也可能相互影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Schizophrenia Bulletin 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Schizophrenia Bulletin seeks to review recent developments and empirically based hypotheses regarding the etiology and treatment of schizophrenia. We view the field as broad and deep, and will publish new knowledge ranging from the molecular basis to social and cultural factors. We will give new emphasis to translational reports which simultaneously highlight basic neurobiological mechanisms and clinical manifestations. Some of the Bulletin content is invited as special features or manuscripts organized as a theme by special guest editors. Most pages of the Bulletin are devoted to unsolicited manuscripts of high quality that report original data or where we can provide a special venue for a major study or workshop report. Supplement issues are sometimes provided for manuscripts reporting from a recent conference.
期刊最新文献
277. Characteristics of human-computer interaction behavior on social media: a longitudinal study on the correlation between usage duration, content interaction, language style, and loneliness 265. The intervention effect and follow-up of mindfulness cognitive therapy on college students' social anxiety 186. A study on the emotional counseling function and mental health education strategies of ideological and political education in colleges from a psychological perspective 128. The intervention of real-time speech recognition translation for social anxiety disorders among international students 2. Impact of media discourse on stigmatization of patients with depression and research on de stigmatization communication strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1