Adoption of Decentralized Trial Elements in Cancer Clinical Trials Supporting FDA Approvals During COVID-19

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Clinical Cancer Research Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3357
Timil H. Patel, Amy Corneli, Pamela Balcazar, Craig Lipset, Sara B. Calvert, Sabrena Mervin-Blake, Vinit Nalawade, Paul G. Kluetz
{"title":"Adoption of Decentralized Trial Elements in Cancer Clinical Trials Supporting FDA Approvals During COVID-19","authors":"Timil H. Patel, Amy Corneli, Pamela Balcazar, Craig Lipset, Sara B. Calvert, Sabrena Mervin-Blake, Vinit Nalawade, Paul G. Kluetz","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted cancer clinical trials, prompting sponsors to adopt decentralized clinical trial (DCT) elements to ensure patient safety and trial continuity. Supported by FDA emergency guidance, the FDA Oncology Center of Excellence, in collaboration with the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI), conducted an assessment of DCT elements in cancer trials leading to FDA approval during the pandemic. Between December 6, 2022, and January 17, 2023, CTTI collected survey data from trial sponsors about DCT elements used in response to the pandemic, implementation challenges, and anticipated future use. Out of 52 eligible trials, 19 responses were received from 13 sponsors, predominantly large pharmaceutical companies. The majority of trials (89%) included both U.S. and international sites, and nearly all sponsors (95%) adopted at least one DCT element during the pandemic. Key DCT elements included remote site monitoring (89%), telemedicine (68%), remote laboratory assessments (63%), and remote distribution of investigational products (58%). Main challenges encountered included institutional policies (83%), technology adoption (61%), and regulatory restrictions (56%). Despite challenges, sponsors showed strong intent to continue DCT use, especially for remote monitoring, patient-reported outcomes collection, and telemedicine. This study demonstrates the viability of DCT elements for generating FDA-approvable data, suggesting potential for expanded trial access and reduced patient burden. Continued attention to site-level challenges is needed to sustain DCT adoption in cancer clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3357","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted cancer clinical trials, prompting sponsors to adopt decentralized clinical trial (DCT) elements to ensure patient safety and trial continuity. Supported by FDA emergency guidance, the FDA Oncology Center of Excellence, in collaboration with the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI), conducted an assessment of DCT elements in cancer trials leading to FDA approval during the pandemic. Between December 6, 2022, and January 17, 2023, CTTI collected survey data from trial sponsors about DCT elements used in response to the pandemic, implementation challenges, and anticipated future use. Out of 52 eligible trials, 19 responses were received from 13 sponsors, predominantly large pharmaceutical companies. The majority of trials (89%) included both U.S. and international sites, and nearly all sponsors (95%) adopted at least one DCT element during the pandemic. Key DCT elements included remote site monitoring (89%), telemedicine (68%), remote laboratory assessments (63%), and remote distribution of investigational products (58%). Main challenges encountered included institutional policies (83%), technology adoption (61%), and regulatory restrictions (56%). Despite challenges, sponsors showed strong intent to continue DCT use, especially for remote monitoring, patient-reported outcomes collection, and telemedicine. This study demonstrates the viability of DCT elements for generating FDA-approvable data, suggesting potential for expanded trial access and reduced patient burden. Continued attention to site-level challenges is needed to sustain DCT adoption in cancer clinical trials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
期刊最新文献
Radiation Dose-Volume Effects on Negative Tumor-Draining Lymph Nodes Impacted T-Cell Activation and Prognosis in Esophageal Cancer with Chemoradiotherapy ­­­­­Targeting Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase Suppresses De Novo Lipogenesis and Tumor Cell Growth in Multiple Myeloma Pembrolizumab in combination with binimetinib in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer Zanubrutinib plus Ixazomib and Dexamethasone in newly diagnosed symptomatic Waldenström macroglobulinemia:a phase II study Quantitative Protein Expression of Antibody-Drug Conjugate Targets in EGFR Mutated and Wild-Type Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1