Mixed valvular heart disease: diagnosis and management

IF 37.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf116
Philippe Unger, Xavier Galloo, Philippe Pibarot
{"title":"Mixed valvular heart disease: diagnosis and management","authors":"Philippe Unger, Xavier Galloo, Philippe Pibarot","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mixed valvular diseases (MVDs) are common but have received little attention in the literature, especially regarding the mitral valve (MV) and the right-sided cardiac valves. Whereas echocardiography plays a pivotal diagnostic role, the diagnosis is made difficult due to haemodynamic interactions that may invalidate common indices of severity used in isolated stenosis or regurgitation. The diagnostic strategy should aim at initially separately assessing stenosis and regurgitation, taking into account the diagnostic pitfalls, with complementary use of multimodality imaging in cases of persisting diagnostic uncertainties. Unlike aortic stenosis, the calcium score cannot be used as a surrogate for haemodynamic severity of mixed MV disease. Severe stenosis and/or severe regurgitation are indicative of severe MVD, and management should follow recommendations on the predominant lesion. However, some patients with the combination of moderate stenosis and moderate regurgitation have a poor prognosis when left untreated. Concordant data suggest that, in patients with mixed aortic or MV disease, transvalvular velocities and pressure gradients are more powerful prognostic indicators than valve area or the severity of regurgitation. It is essential to consider the global repercussions that indicate poor outcomes in patients with MVD. However, whereas symptoms and/or ventricular dysfunction are considered as clear indication for intervention, imaging cut-offs have not been validated for balanced moderate regurgitation and stenosis. Although emerging evidence tends to support earlier management, further prospective studies are required, and pending the results of these studies, asymptomatic patients with MVD should be closely monitored.","PeriodicalId":11976,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":37.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf116","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mixed valvular diseases (MVDs) are common but have received little attention in the literature, especially regarding the mitral valve (MV) and the right-sided cardiac valves. Whereas echocardiography plays a pivotal diagnostic role, the diagnosis is made difficult due to haemodynamic interactions that may invalidate common indices of severity used in isolated stenosis or regurgitation. The diagnostic strategy should aim at initially separately assessing stenosis and regurgitation, taking into account the diagnostic pitfalls, with complementary use of multimodality imaging in cases of persisting diagnostic uncertainties. Unlike aortic stenosis, the calcium score cannot be used as a surrogate for haemodynamic severity of mixed MV disease. Severe stenosis and/or severe regurgitation are indicative of severe MVD, and management should follow recommendations on the predominant lesion. However, some patients with the combination of moderate stenosis and moderate regurgitation have a poor prognosis when left untreated. Concordant data suggest that, in patients with mixed aortic or MV disease, transvalvular velocities and pressure gradients are more powerful prognostic indicators than valve area or the severity of regurgitation. It is essential to consider the global repercussions that indicate poor outcomes in patients with MVD. However, whereas symptoms and/or ventricular dysfunction are considered as clear indication for intervention, imaging cut-offs have not been validated for balanced moderate regurgitation and stenosis. Although emerging evidence tends to support earlier management, further prospective studies are required, and pending the results of these studies, asymptomatic patients with MVD should be closely monitored.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal
European Heart Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
39.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
3942
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal is a renowned international journal that focuses on cardiovascular medicine. It is published weekly and is the official journal of the European Society of Cardiology. This peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing high-quality clinical and scientific material pertaining to all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. It covers a diverse range of topics including research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. Moreover, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of information and discussions on various aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational matters. In addition to original papers on cardiovascular medicine and surgery, the European Heart Journal also presents reviews, clinical perspectives, ESC Guidelines, and editorial articles that highlight recent advancements in cardiology. Additionally, the journal actively encourages readers to share their thoughts and opinions through correspondence.
期刊最新文献
A rare splice-site variant in TNNT2: the need for ancestral diversity in genomic reference data sets. Distinct inflammatory pathways shape atherosclerosis in different vascular beds High intensity exercise programme in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a randomized trial Mixed valvular heart disease: diagnosis and management Cardio-oncology rehabilitation and exercise: evidence, priorities, and research standards from the ICOS-CORE working group
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1