A sensitivity study and robustness evaluation of the CWFS and DISL approaches for brittle failure continuum modelling around underground excavations

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1016/j.tust.2025.106523
L.F. Gomez de Alba , A.G. Corkum , N. Bahrani , D. Mas Ivars
{"title":"A sensitivity study and robustness evaluation of the CWFS and DISL approaches for brittle failure continuum modelling around underground excavations","authors":"L.F. Gomez de Alba ,&nbsp;A.G. Corkum ,&nbsp;N. Bahrani ,&nbsp;D. Mas Ivars","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.106523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Numerical modelling of tunnels in brittle rock is a challenging endeavour for rock mechanics engineers. Multiple methods have been developed to aid in the design of underground excavations that are prone to brittle failure. For rock mechanics practitioners, the most useful tools are those that adequately and objectively represent the ground reaction, and can be interpreted without excessive qualitative judgement. With these goals in mind, continuum numerical models stand out amongst other methods. Two approaches that make use of continuum numerical modelling are the Cohesion Weakening Friction Strengthening (CWFS) and the Damage Initiation Spalling Limit (DISL)<em>.</em> To test their robustness, a sensitivity analysis of the strength parameters was conducted. The approaches were then applied to multiple fictitious stress scenarios to test their capability of reproducing empirical observations of depth of failure. The present investigation shows that the CWFS approach is a robust approach for modelling brittle failure around tunnels that can be easily applied and interpreted by rock mechanics practitioners. The sensitivity analysis of the CWFS parameters provided a full understanding of the practical impact of input parameter selection, some of which were not previously given in the literature. The DISL approach has been shown to also perform suitably, but requires the user to apply a fundamental understanding of numerical modelling for its effective interpretation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 106523"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825001610","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerical modelling of tunnels in brittle rock is a challenging endeavour for rock mechanics engineers. Multiple methods have been developed to aid in the design of underground excavations that are prone to brittle failure. For rock mechanics practitioners, the most useful tools are those that adequately and objectively represent the ground reaction, and can be interpreted without excessive qualitative judgement. With these goals in mind, continuum numerical models stand out amongst other methods. Two approaches that make use of continuum numerical modelling are the Cohesion Weakening Friction Strengthening (CWFS) and the Damage Initiation Spalling Limit (DISL). To test their robustness, a sensitivity analysis of the strength parameters was conducted. The approaches were then applied to multiple fictitious stress scenarios to test their capability of reproducing empirical observations of depth of failure. The present investigation shows that the CWFS approach is a robust approach for modelling brittle failure around tunnels that can be easily applied and interpreted by rock mechanics practitioners. The sensitivity analysis of the CWFS parameters provided a full understanding of the practical impact of input parameter selection, some of which were not previously given in the literature. The DISL approach has been shown to also perform suitably, but requires the user to apply a fundamental understanding of numerical modelling for its effective interpretation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
期刊最新文献
Shaking table and pushover tests on subway station improved by truncated columns Experimental and numerical research of hydrogen-blended natural gas leakage and diffusion in utility tunnels Multi-parameter determination method for rock discontinuity roughness based on geometric properties intelligent extraction Analysis of longitudinal deformation of existing rectangular pipe jacking tunnel caused by shield tunnel undercrossing The experimental study on the flame extension length and maximum temperature of ceiling jet flame in the curved tunnel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1