Development of Hybrid radiomic Machine learning models for preoperative prediction of meningioma grade on multiparametric MRI

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111118
Steven Zhang , Jesse Richter , Jonathon Veale , Vu Minh Hieu Phan , Nick Candy , Santosh Poonnoose , Marc Agzarian , Minh-Son To
{"title":"Development of Hybrid radiomic Machine learning models for preoperative prediction of meningioma grade on multiparametric MRI","authors":"Steven Zhang ,&nbsp;Jesse Richter ,&nbsp;Jonathon Veale ,&nbsp;Vu Minh Hieu Phan ,&nbsp;Nick Candy ,&nbsp;Santosh Poonnoose ,&nbsp;Marc Agzarian ,&nbsp;Minh-Son To","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To develop and compare machine learning models for distinguishing low and high grade meningiomas on multiparametric MRI. Methods: Pre-operative T1-weighted(T1), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted(T1CE), T2-weighted, T2 FLAIR, and DWI/ADC MRI sequences of meningiomas performed between 2000 and 2020 were retrospectively collected from a single tertiary hospital dedicated neurosurgical department. Tumours were manually segmented and handcrafted radiomic features were extracted. Deep learning features were extracted using a fine-tuned foundation model. Various oversampling techniques, feature selection algorithms and classifiers were trialled to build Handcrafted radiomics only (HRO) and handcrafted with deep learning radiomics (HDLR) models. Bootstrap was used for internal validation of model performance and calculating confidence intervals of metrices. Discrimination, calibration, feature importance and clinical utility of models were assessed via ROC AUC, calibration curve, Shapley values and decision curve analysis, respectively. Results: The analysis included 97 low grade and 18 high grade meningiomas. HRO and HDLR models had comparable diagnostic performance, using Random Forest and XGBoost respectively. They achieved mean (95 %CI): ROC AUC 0.825[0.662,0.952] and 0.794[0.662,0.948], specificity 0.913[0.793,0.952] and 0.892[0.796,0.983], sensitivity 0.499[0.204,1] and 0.509[0.225,0.851], NPV 0.909[0.851,0.971] and 0.909[0.851,0.972], and PPV 0.529[0.238,0.924] and 0.465[0.263,0.846], respectively for HRO and HDLR models. HRO and HDLR models selected 11–12 features, with T1 and T1CE having consistent importance. Conclusion: HRO and HDLR can effectively predict meningioma grades preoperatively. Challenges remain in achieving consistent sensitivity and PPV. Larger, multi-centre studies are warranted to confirm our findings, but it holds promise for improving personalized treatment strategies and patient outcomes in meningioma management. Code is available on Github <span><span>https://github.com/stephano41/radiomics_ai</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 111118"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825000906","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To develop and compare machine learning models for distinguishing low and high grade meningiomas on multiparametric MRI. Methods: Pre-operative T1-weighted(T1), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted(T1CE), T2-weighted, T2 FLAIR, and DWI/ADC MRI sequences of meningiomas performed between 2000 and 2020 were retrospectively collected from a single tertiary hospital dedicated neurosurgical department. Tumours were manually segmented and handcrafted radiomic features were extracted. Deep learning features were extracted using a fine-tuned foundation model. Various oversampling techniques, feature selection algorithms and classifiers were trialled to build Handcrafted radiomics only (HRO) and handcrafted with deep learning radiomics (HDLR) models. Bootstrap was used for internal validation of model performance and calculating confidence intervals of metrices. Discrimination, calibration, feature importance and clinical utility of models were assessed via ROC AUC, calibration curve, Shapley values and decision curve analysis, respectively. Results: The analysis included 97 low grade and 18 high grade meningiomas. HRO and HDLR models had comparable diagnostic performance, using Random Forest and XGBoost respectively. They achieved mean (95 %CI): ROC AUC 0.825[0.662,0.952] and 0.794[0.662,0.948], specificity 0.913[0.793,0.952] and 0.892[0.796,0.983], sensitivity 0.499[0.204,1] and 0.509[0.225,0.851], NPV 0.909[0.851,0.971] and 0.909[0.851,0.972], and PPV 0.529[0.238,0.924] and 0.465[0.263,0.846], respectively for HRO and HDLR models. HRO and HDLR models selected 11–12 features, with T1 and T1CE having consistent importance. Conclusion: HRO and HDLR can effectively predict meningioma grades preoperatively. Challenges remain in achieving consistent sensitivity and PPV. Larger, multi-centre studies are warranted to confirm our findings, but it holds promise for improving personalized treatment strategies and patient outcomes in meningioma management. Code is available on Github https://github.com/stephano41/radiomics_ai.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于多参数MRI预测脑膜瘤分级的混合放射学机器学习模型的开发
目的建立并比较机器学习模型在多参数MRI上鉴别高低级别脑膜瘤的效果。方法:回顾性收集某三级医院神经外科2000 - 2020年间脑膜瘤术前T1加权(T1)、增强T1加权(T1CE)、T2加权、T2 FLAIR和DWI/ADC MRI序列。人工分割肿瘤并提取手工制作的放射学特征。使用微调的基础模型提取深度学习特征。研究人员尝试了各种过采样技术、特征选择算法和分类器,以构建仅手工制作的放射组学(HRO)和手工制作的深度学习放射组学(HDLR)模型。Bootstrap用于模型性能的内部验证和度量置信区间的计算。分别通过ROC AUC、校正曲线、Shapley值和决策曲线分析评价模型的鉴别性、校正性、特征重要性和临床实用性。结果:低级别脑膜瘤97例,高级别脑膜瘤18例。HRO和HDLR模型分别使用Random Forest和XGBoost具有相当的诊断性能。平均(95% CI): HRO和HDLR模型的ROC AUC分别为0.825[0.662,0.952]和0.794[0.662,0.948],特异性为0.913[0.793,0.952]和0.892[0.796,0.983],敏感性为0.499[0.204,1]和0.509[0.225,0.851],NPV分别为0.909[0.851,0.971]和0.909[0.851,0.972],PPV分别为0.529[0.238,0.924]和0.465[0.263,0.846]。HRO和HDLR模型选择了11-12个特征,其中T1和T1CE具有一致的重要性。结论:术前HRO和HDLR可有效预测脑膜瘤分级。在实现一致的灵敏度和PPV方面仍然存在挑战。更大的、多中心的研究需要证实我们的发现,但它有望改善脑膜瘤治疗的个性化治疗策略和患者预后。代码可在Github https://github.com/stephano41/radiomics_ai上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
期刊最新文献
Impact of low body mass index on stroke outcomes: A propensity-matched analysis. Biological and clinical implications of autologous bone flap preservation strategies after decompressive craniectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Understanding the etiologies of meralgia Paresthetica: An In-Depth review and Meta-Analysis of iatrogenic causes. Risk factors for a decrease in somatosensory evoked potential amplitude during carotid endarterectomy with routine shunting. Implementation of a virtual curriculum for medical students completing clinical rotations in neurosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1