Large-scale validation of the Kessler-10 Scale's psychometric properties among healthcare professionals in China

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY General hospital psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.02.017
Ye Wang , Zheng Zeng , Changqun Huang , Jing Ma , Jialu Ye , Jiafeng Li , Xiuliang Deng , Lan Zhang
{"title":"Large-scale validation of the Kessler-10 Scale's psychometric properties among healthcare professionals in China","authors":"Ye Wang ,&nbsp;Zheng Zeng ,&nbsp;Changqun Huang ,&nbsp;Jing Ma ,&nbsp;Jialu Ye ,&nbsp;Jiafeng Li ,&nbsp;Xiuliang Deng ,&nbsp;Lan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.02.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) is a 10-item questionnaire designed to measure psychological distress. The present study aimed to validate the factor structure of the K10 and its reliability and validity using a large sample from healthcare professionals in China mainland.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>K10 data were collected in September 19 to October 20, 2023 via anonymous online survey (total sample, <em>N</em> = 8602).</div><div>The internal consistency reliability of the K10 was examined. Exploratory factor analysis (<em>N</em> = 4301) and confirmatory factor analysis(N = 4301) were conducted to validate the structural validity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Exploratory factor analysis revealed two factors, depression (DEP) and anxiety (ANX), which together accounted for 75.91 % of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis further supported the two-factor oblique model as the best fit, outperforming the one-factor model. The internal consistency of the K10 was α = 0.952, while the internal consistency coefficients for ANX and DEP were 0.883 and 0.940, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>K10 is a validated and concise tool that serves a dual purpose of screening psychological distress and assessing depressive and anxiety symptoms among healthcare professionals in China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"94 ","pages":"Pages 112-117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325000477","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) is a 10-item questionnaire designed to measure psychological distress. The present study aimed to validate the factor structure of the K10 and its reliability and validity using a large sample from healthcare professionals in China mainland.

Methods

K10 data were collected in September 19 to October 20, 2023 via anonymous online survey (total sample, N = 8602).
The internal consistency reliability of the K10 was examined. Exploratory factor analysis (N = 4301) and confirmatory factor analysis(N = 4301) were conducted to validate the structural validity.

Results

Exploratory factor analysis revealed two factors, depression (DEP) and anxiety (ANX), which together accounted for 75.91 % of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis further supported the two-factor oblique model as the best fit, outperforming the one-factor model. The internal consistency of the K10 was α = 0.952, while the internal consistency coefficients for ANX and DEP were 0.883 and 0.940, respectively.

Conclusions

K10 is a validated and concise tool that serves a dual purpose of screening psychological distress and assessing depressive and anxiety symptoms among healthcare professionals in China.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
凯斯勒-10量表在中国医疗保健专业人员中的心理测量特性的大规模验证
目的《凯斯勒心理困扰量表》(K10)是一份包含10个项目的心理困扰量表。本研究旨在通过对中国大陆医疗卫生专业人员进行大样本调查,验证K10量表的因子结构及其信度和效度。方法20123年9月19日至2023年10月20日,采用匿名在线调查方式收集数据10份(总样本,N = 8602)。对K10的内部一致性信度进行了检验。采用探索性因子分析(N = 4301)和验证性因子分析(N = 4301)验证结构效度。结果探索性因素分析显示,抑郁(DEP)和焦虑(ANX)两个因素共占总方差的75.91%。验证性因子分析进一步支持双因素倾斜模型为最佳拟合,优于单因素模型。K10的内部一致性系数为α = 0.952, ANX和DEP的内部一致性系数分别为0.883和0.940。结论sk10是一种经过验证且简洁的工具,可用于筛查中国卫生保健专业人员的心理困扰和评估抑郁和焦虑症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Reply to the letter to the editor critiquing the article "Psychometric validation of the German version of the somatic symptom disorder - B criteria scale (SSD-12) in a primary care population with depression and anxiety: A COSMIN-guided analysis". Advancing cancer neuroscience through stress modulation: Interdisciplinary potential of psilocybin and ketamine. Commentary on Schettino et al.: Distinguishing psychological support from psychotherapy in psychedelic medicine - Integrating intent and behavioral frameworks. Corrigendum to "Demoralization in clinical settings: A scoping review of measurement tools and psychometric properties" [General Hospital Psychiatry 99 (2026) 159-170]. A letter to the editor critiquing the article "Psychometric validation of the German version of the somatic symptom disorder - B criteria scale (SSD-12) in a primary care population with depression and anxiety: A COSMIN-guided analysis".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1