Understanding the Reasons Why Patients With Food Insecurity Decline Social Assistance at a Large Academic Medical Center

Alexander Connelley BS , Abigail Young BA , Jennifer T. Lee , Markell Miller MPH , Eileen Spring MA , Wei Hao PhD , Julia A. Wolfson PhD , Alicia J. Cohen MD , Minal R. Patel PhD , Cindy W. Leung ScD
{"title":"Understanding the Reasons Why Patients With Food Insecurity Decline Social Assistance at a Large Academic Medical Center","authors":"Alexander Connelley BS ,&nbsp;Abigail Young BA ,&nbsp;Jennifer T. Lee ,&nbsp;Markell Miller MPH ,&nbsp;Eileen Spring MA ,&nbsp;Wei Hao PhD ,&nbsp;Julia A. Wolfson PhD ,&nbsp;Alicia J. Cohen MD ,&nbsp;Minal R. Patel PhD ,&nbsp;Cindy W. Leung ScD","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2025.100320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Despite the recent expansions of clinical screening for food insecurity, research shows large discrepancies between the number of patients who report food insecurity and those who request assistance. In this qualitative study of patients with food insecurity who declined social assistance, the authors aimed to understand the patients’ reasons for not seeking food-related assistance and explore their perspectives on addressing food insecurity with their healthcare provider.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>At a large academic medical center in southeast Michigan, the authors conducted semistructured, in-depth interviews with 31 English-speaking adult primary care patients who had screened positive for food insecurity at a previous clinic encounter and subsequently declined assistance from a trained social worker. The interview guide explored patients’ reasons for declining social assistance, perspectives on clinical screening for food insecurity and other social risk factors, and the extent to which they discussed their needs with their provider. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the constant comparative method to reveal emergent themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean age of the participants was 48.2 years, and 71% were women. The most prominent reasons for patients with food insecurity not seeking social assistance were the belief that the potential resources would be redundant or not helpful and previous negative experiences with receiving food assistance. Several patients also did not remember or know that they had declined assistance. Most patients believed that healthcare providers should be knowledgeable about patients’ food insecurity status to better inform care delivery. However, patients expressed discomfort, fear, or embarrassment in revealing this information and emphasized the importance of providers fostering a supportive and empathetic healthcare environment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Strategies to connect patients with food assistance must target multiple levels, including improving assistance methods, increasing provider knowledge, and prioritizing patient comfort.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065425000082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Despite the recent expansions of clinical screening for food insecurity, research shows large discrepancies between the number of patients who report food insecurity and those who request assistance. In this qualitative study of patients with food insecurity who declined social assistance, the authors aimed to understand the patients’ reasons for not seeking food-related assistance and explore their perspectives on addressing food insecurity with their healthcare provider.

Methods

At a large academic medical center in southeast Michigan, the authors conducted semistructured, in-depth interviews with 31 English-speaking adult primary care patients who had screened positive for food insecurity at a previous clinic encounter and subsequently declined assistance from a trained social worker. The interview guide explored patients’ reasons for declining social assistance, perspectives on clinical screening for food insecurity and other social risk factors, and the extent to which they discussed their needs with their provider. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the constant comparative method to reveal emergent themes.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 48.2 years, and 71% were women. The most prominent reasons for patients with food insecurity not seeking social assistance were the belief that the potential resources would be redundant or not helpful and previous negative experiences with receiving food assistance. Several patients also did not remember or know that they had declined assistance. Most patients believed that healthcare providers should be knowledgeable about patients’ food insecurity status to better inform care delivery. However, patients expressed discomfort, fear, or embarrassment in revealing this information and emphasized the importance of providers fostering a supportive and empathetic healthcare environment.

Conclusions

Strategies to connect patients with food assistance must target multiple levels, including improving assistance methods, increasing provider knowledge, and prioritizing patient comfort.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解一个大型学术医疗中心的食品不安全患者减少社会援助的原因
尽管最近扩大了对粮食不安全的临床筛查,但研究表明,报告粮食不安全的患者数量与要求援助的患者数量之间存在很大差异。在这个质性研究患者的粮食不安全谁拒绝社会援助,作者旨在了解患者的原因,不寻求粮食相关的援助,并探讨他们的观点,解决粮食不安全与他们的医疗保健提供者。方法:在密歇根州东南部的一个大型学术医疗中心,作者对31名英语成人初级保健患者进行了半结构化的深度访谈,这些患者在之前的诊所就诊中筛查出食物不安全阳性,随后拒绝了训练有素的社会工作者的帮助。访谈指南探讨了患者拒绝社会援助的原因,对食品不安全和其他社会风险因素的临床筛查的看法,以及他们与提供者讨论其需求的程度。访谈记录,转录和分析使用恒定的比较方法来揭示紧急主题。结果参与者的平均年龄为48.2岁,女性占71%。粮食不安全患者不寻求社会援助的最主要原因是认为潜在资源是多余的或没有帮助的,以及以前接受粮食援助的负面经历。一些病人也不记得或不知道他们拒绝了帮助。大多数患者认为,医疗保健提供者应该了解患者的食品不安全状况,以更好地告知护理服务。然而,患者在透露这些信息时表达了不适、恐惧或尴尬,并强调了提供者培养支持性和移情医疗环境的重要性。结论患者与食物援助的对接策略必须从多个层面进行,包括改进援助方式、提高提供者知识水平和优先考虑患者舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Virtual Versus In-Person Delivery on Behavior Changes Among Adults Enrolled in the Diabetes Prevention Program in the Rio Grande Valley, Texas: A Secondary Analysis. Editorial Board and Journal Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1