Comparative analysis of accident mechanisms and injury patterns of e-moped, and e-scooter operators

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2025.02.045
Adi Brenner , Dana Niry , Itay Blum , Genady Shendler , Aviad Rabinowich , Dana Stav , Yuval Ran , Ahuva Weiss-Meilik , Omer J. Ungar
{"title":"Comparative analysis of accident mechanisms and injury patterns of e-moped, and e-scooter operators","authors":"Adi Brenner ,&nbsp;Dana Niry ,&nbsp;Itay Blum ,&nbsp;Genady Shendler ,&nbsp;Aviad Rabinowich ,&nbsp;Dana Stav ,&nbsp;Yuval Ran ,&nbsp;Ahuva Weiss-Meilik ,&nbsp;Omer J. Ungar","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.02.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare accident-related injuries and degree of risk for operators/riders of e-mopeds and e-scooters.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective medical charts review in a tertiary medical center was performed. All individuals aged 13 years and older who were referred to a single tertiary referral center after 2 wheels vehicle injury were enrolled. Demographics, injury type, imaging, surgeries, hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay, mortality, helmet use and hour and day of injury were recorded and analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2429 patients were enrolled (1095 e-moped and 1334 e-scooter operators/riders). The mean (±standard deviation) age for operators/riders was 31.5 (±11.7) years. There was a male preponderance in both groups (70.8 % and 60.3 % in the e-moped and e-scooter operators/riders, respectively). Helmet use was poor, with an overall usage rate of 39.7 % among all riders. <em>E</em>-moped operators/riders were more commonly hospitalized in the intensive care unit (1.5 %) than e-scooter operator/riders (0.6 %), <em>p</em> = 0.039. <em>E</em>-moped operators/riders had significantly fewer injuries (35.7 %) compared to e-scooter operators/riders (42.4 %), <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001. <em>E</em>-Scooters were associated with significantly more face and upper extremity injuries compared to e-moped (<em>9.0 % and 23.9 % compared to 5.8 % and 19.4 %,</em> respectively, <em>p</em> = 0.003 and 0.008, respectively). Chest and abdomen injuries were more common in the e-moped operators/riders compared to the e-scooters operators/riders (4.4 % and 1.1 % compared to 2.1 % and 0.3 %, respectively, <em>p</em> = 0.002 and 0.021, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The data in this analysis indicated that e-Scooters are involved in a higher number of accidental injuries that tend to be less severe and result in fewer fatalities than those sustained by e-moped use. In contrast, e-mopeds were linked to more complex injuries, as reflected by higher hospitalization rates, ICU admissions and multi-level injuries among e-moped operators/riders. This finding also corresponded to a higher demand for imaging studies in the emergency department (ED). Additionally, our analysis of a relatively smaller cohort of helmeted versus non-helmeted patients reinforces the critical role of helmets in mitigating head and face injuries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"Pages 32-36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675725001536","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare accident-related injuries and degree of risk for operators/riders of e-mopeds and e-scooters.

Methods

A retrospective medical charts review in a tertiary medical center was performed. All individuals aged 13 years and older who were referred to a single tertiary referral center after 2 wheels vehicle injury were enrolled. Demographics, injury type, imaging, surgeries, hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay, mortality, helmet use and hour and day of injury were recorded and analyzed.

Results

A total of 2429 patients were enrolled (1095 e-moped and 1334 e-scooter operators/riders). The mean (±standard deviation) age for operators/riders was 31.5 (±11.7) years. There was a male preponderance in both groups (70.8 % and 60.3 % in the e-moped and e-scooter operators/riders, respectively). Helmet use was poor, with an overall usage rate of 39.7 % among all riders. E-moped operators/riders were more commonly hospitalized in the intensive care unit (1.5 %) than e-scooter operator/riders (0.6 %), p = 0.039. E-moped operators/riders had significantly fewer injuries (35.7 %) compared to e-scooter operators/riders (42.4 %), p < 0.001. E-Scooters were associated with significantly more face and upper extremity injuries compared to e-moped (9.0 % and 23.9 % compared to 5.8 % and 19.4 %, respectively, p = 0.003 and 0.008, respectively). Chest and abdomen injuries were more common in the e-moped operators/riders compared to the e-scooters operators/riders (4.4 % and 1.1 % compared to 2.1 % and 0.3 %, respectively, p = 0.002 and 0.021, respectively).

Conclusion

The data in this analysis indicated that e-Scooters are involved in a higher number of accidental injuries that tend to be less severe and result in fewer fatalities than those sustained by e-moped use. In contrast, e-mopeds were linked to more complex injuries, as reflected by higher hospitalization rates, ICU admissions and multi-level injuries among e-moped operators/riders. This finding also corresponded to a higher demand for imaging studies in the emergency department (ED). Additionally, our analysis of a relatively smaller cohort of helmeted versus non-helmeted patients reinforces the critical role of helmets in mitigating head and face injuries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电动轻便摩托车和电动摩托车驾驶员的事故机理和受伤模式比较分析
目的比较电动轻便摩托车和电动滑板车操作人员/骑行者的事故伤害及风险程度。方法对某三级医疗中心的病历进行回顾性分析。所有年龄在13岁及以上的2轮车辆损伤后转诊到单一三级转诊中心的患者均被纳入研究。统计数据、损伤类型、影像学、手术、住院和重症监护病房的住院时间、死亡率、头盔使用以及损伤的小时数和天数被记录和分析。结果共纳入2429例患者,其中电动滑板车操作/骑乘者1095例,电动滑板车操作/骑乘者1334例。操作员/车手的平均(±标准差)年龄为31.5(±11.7)岁。在这两组中,男性都占优势(电动助力车和电动滑板车的操作员/骑手分别占70.8%和60.3%)。头盔使用率较低,总体使用率为39.7%。电动助力车操作员/骑手在重症监护病房住院的比例(1.5%)高于电动滑板车操作员/骑手(0.6%),p = 0.039。与电动滑板车操作员/车手(42.4%)相比,电动助力车操作员/车手的受伤率(35.7%)显著减少。0.001. 与电动助力车相比,电动滑板车的面部和上肢损伤明显更多(分别为9.0%和23.9%,分别为5.8%和19.4%,p = 0.003和0.008)。与电动滑板车操作员/车手相比,电动助力车操作员/车手的胸部和腹部损伤更为常见(分别为4.4%和1.1%,分别为2.1%和0.3%,p = 0.002和0.021)。结论本分析的数据表明,与使用电动滑板车相比,电动滑板车涉及更多的意外伤害,这些意外伤害往往不那么严重,导致的死亡人数也更少。相比之下,电动助力车与更复杂的伤害有关,这反映在更高的住院率、ICU入院率和电动助力车操作员/骑手的多层次伤害上。这一发现也与急诊科(ED)对影像学研究的更高需求相对应。此外,我们对戴头盔与不戴头盔患者相对较小队列的分析强化了头盔在减轻头部和面部损伤方面的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Serum myoglobin burden in disaster-related crush syndrome following the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes. Positive serial blood cultures after negative initial cultures in the ED for patients with sepsis. Practice changing articles: Efficacy of albuterol-budesonide inhaler compared with albuterol alone in mild asthma. Large academic enterprise load balancing: ED patient transfers to regional hospitals. Mixed reality simulation outperforms video for peripheral venous catheter placement training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1