A decade of machine learning in lithium-ion battery state estimation: a systematic review

IF 2.6 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Ionics Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1007/s11581-024-06049-4
Zaina Al-Hashimi, Taha Khamis, Mouaz Al Kouzbary, Nooranida Arifin, Hamam Mokayed, Noor Azuan Abu Osman
{"title":"A decade of machine learning in lithium-ion battery state estimation: a systematic review","authors":"Zaina Al-Hashimi,&nbsp;Taha Khamis,&nbsp;Mouaz Al Kouzbary,&nbsp;Nooranida Arifin,&nbsp;Hamam Mokayed,&nbsp;Noor Azuan Abu Osman","doi":"10.1007/s11581-024-06049-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lithium-ion batteries are central to contemporary energy storage systems, yet the precise estimation of critical states—state of charge (SOC), state of health (SOH), and remaining useful life (RUL)—remains a complex challenge under dynamic and varied conditions. Conventional methodologies often fail to meet the required adaptability and precision, leading to a growing emphasis on the application of machine learning (ML) techniques to enhance battery management systems (BMS). This review examines a decade of progress (2013–2024) in ML-based state estimation, meticulously analysing 58 pivotal publications selected from an initial corpus of 2414 studies. Unlike existing reviews, this work uniquely emphasizes the integration of novel frameworks such as Tiny Machine Learning (TinyML) and Scientific Machine Learning (SciML), which address critical limitations by offering resource-efficient and interpretable solutions. Through detailed comparative analyses, the review explores the strengths, weaknesses, and practical considerations of various ML methodologies, focusing on trade-offs in computational complexity, real-time implementation, and generalization across diverse datasets. Persistent barriers, including the absence of standardized datasets, stagnation in innovation, and scalability constraints, are identified alongside targeted recommendations. By synthesizing past advancements and proposing forward-thinking approaches, this review provides valuable insights and actionable strategies to drive the development of robust, scalable, and efficient energy storage technologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":599,"journal":{"name":"Ionics","volume":"31 3","pages":"2351 - 2377"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ionics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11581-024-06049-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lithium-ion batteries are central to contemporary energy storage systems, yet the precise estimation of critical states—state of charge (SOC), state of health (SOH), and remaining useful life (RUL)—remains a complex challenge under dynamic and varied conditions. Conventional methodologies often fail to meet the required adaptability and precision, leading to a growing emphasis on the application of machine learning (ML) techniques to enhance battery management systems (BMS). This review examines a decade of progress (2013–2024) in ML-based state estimation, meticulously analysing 58 pivotal publications selected from an initial corpus of 2414 studies. Unlike existing reviews, this work uniquely emphasizes the integration of novel frameworks such as Tiny Machine Learning (TinyML) and Scientific Machine Learning (SciML), which address critical limitations by offering resource-efficient and interpretable solutions. Through detailed comparative analyses, the review explores the strengths, weaknesses, and practical considerations of various ML methodologies, focusing on trade-offs in computational complexity, real-time implementation, and generalization across diverse datasets. Persistent barriers, including the absence of standardized datasets, stagnation in innovation, and scalability constraints, are identified alongside targeted recommendations. By synthesizing past advancements and proposing forward-thinking approaches, this review provides valuable insights and actionable strategies to drive the development of robust, scalable, and efficient energy storage technologies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锂离子电池状态估计中的十年机器学习:系统回顾
锂离子电池是当代储能系统的核心,但在动态和多变的条件下,精确估计关键状态——充电状态(SOC)、健康状态(SOH)和剩余使用寿命(RUL)——仍然是一个复杂的挑战。传统的方法往往不能满足所需的适应性和精度,导致人们越来越重视应用机器学习(ML)技术来增强电池管理系统(BMS)。本文回顾了基于机器学习的状态估计十年(2013-2024)的进展,仔细分析了从2414项研究的初始语料库中选择的58篇关键出版物。与现有的评论不同,这项工作独特地强调了微型机器学习(TinyML)和科学机器学习(SciML)等新框架的集成,这些框架通过提供资源高效和可解释的解决方案来解决关键限制。通过详细的比较分析,本文探讨了各种机器学习方法的优点、缺点和实际考虑,重点关注计算复杂性、实时实现和跨不同数据集的泛化方面的权衡。除了有针对性的建议外,还确定了持续存在的障碍,包括缺乏标准化数据集、创新停滞和可扩展性限制。通过综合过去的进展并提出前瞻性的方法,本综述提供了有价值的见解和可操作的策略,以推动强大,可扩展和高效的能源存储技术的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ionics
Ionics 化学-电化学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
427
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Ionics is publishing original results in the fields of science and technology of ionic motion. This includes theoretical, experimental and practical work on electrolytes, electrode, ionic/electronic interfaces, ionic transport aspects of corrosion, galvanic cells, e.g. for thermodynamic and kinetic studies, batteries, fuel cells, sensors and electrochromics. Fast solid ionic conductors are presently providing new opportunities in view of several advantages, in addition to conventional liquid electrolytes.
期刊最新文献
Recycling methods for spent lithium iron phosphate cathode materials An updated review on the potential of V₂O₅-based materials for zinc-ion batteries Radical-oxidation coupled phosphate stabilization strategy: an aqueous and scalable route to mesoporous MnPO4∙H2O precursor for high-performance LiMnPO4 cathodes The coupled influence of multiple conditions on the performance and stability characteristics of PEMFCs Enhanced mathematical modeling of PEM fuel cells using the starfish optimization algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1