The Case for Baptizing a Dying, Unconscious Atheist

IF 2.3 3区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Hastings Center Report Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1002/hast.4956
Abram Brummett, Nelson Jones
{"title":"The Case for Baptizing a Dying, Unconscious Atheist","authors":"Abram Brummett,&nbsp;Nelson Jones","doi":"10.1002/hast.4956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>In the essay “‘Please baptize my son’: The Case against Baptizing a Dying, Unconscious Atheist,” in the same issue of this journal, Tate Shepherd and Michael Redinger describe a case in which a clinical ethicist is consulted when a mother requests that someone from the hospital's spiritual care services baptize her dying, unconscious, atheist adult son. The mother's request produces a moral conflict between providing emotional benefits to the patient's mother from seeing her son baptized at the end of his life and a concern about inflicting dignitary harm on the patient by violating a preference related to a deeply held belief. In this essay, we argue that, in these tragic circumstances, some atheists would be agreeable to being baptized to bring some measure of emotional comfort to their family. We suggest that the clinical ethicist should not respond with a categorical rejection of this possibility but take time with the family to reflect on whether there are good reasons to conclude that the patient would have been receptive to his mother's request</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"55 1","pages":"5-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the essay “‘Please baptize my son’: The Case against Baptizing a Dying, Unconscious Atheist,” in the same issue of this journal, Tate Shepherd and Michael Redinger describe a case in which a clinical ethicist is consulted when a mother requests that someone from the hospital's spiritual care services baptize her dying, unconscious, atheist adult son. The mother's request produces a moral conflict between providing emotional benefits to the patient's mother from seeing her son baptized at the end of his life and a concern about inflicting dignitary harm on the patient by violating a preference related to a deeply held belief. In this essay, we argue that, in these tragic circumstances, some atheists would be agreeable to being baptized to bring some measure of emotional comfort to their family. We suggest that the clinical ethicist should not respond with a categorical rejection of this possibility but take time with the family to reflect on whether there are good reasons to conclude that the patient would have been receptive to his mother's request.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为垂死的、无意识的无神论者施洗的案例
在同一期杂志的文章《‘请给我的儿子施洗’:反对给一个垂死的、无意识的无神论者施洗的案例》中,泰特·谢泼德和迈克尔·雷丁格描述了这样一个案例:一位母亲要求医院精神护理服务部门的人给她垂死的、无意识的、无神论的成年儿子施洗,他们咨询了临床伦理学家。母亲的要求产生了一种道德冲突,一方面是为病人母亲提供情感上的好处,让她看到自己的儿子在生命的尽头受洗,另一方面是担心违反与根深蒂固的信仰有关的偏好,从而对病人的尊严造成伤害。在这篇文章中,我们认为,在这些悲惨的情况下,一些无神论者会同意受洗,以给他们的家庭带来某种程度的情感安慰。我们建议临床伦理学家不应该断然拒绝这种可能性,而应该花时间与家人一起反思是否有充分的理由得出结论,患者会接受他母亲的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hastings Center Report
Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.
期刊最新文献
Why Pediatric Ethics Needs a Theory of Goodness. Why Should People with Lived Experience Be Included in the DSM Revision Process? The Case for Prescribing Metformin Off-Label for a Child in Remission from Ependymoma. Public Engagement as a Form of Moral Leadership. A Parental Request for an Unproven Treatment for a Rare Pediatric Cancer: Sound Reasons for Not Going Off-Label.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1