Screening and care for emotional and cognitive problems after stroke: a prospective mixed-methods process evaluation of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12470-w
J P L Slenders, J M A Visser-Meily, V I H Kwa, R M Van den Berg-Vos, M P J Sommers-Spijkerman, C M Van Heugten
{"title":"Screening and care for emotional and cognitive problems after stroke: a prospective mixed-methods process evaluation of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.","authors":"J P L Slenders, J M A Visser-Meily, V I H Kwa, R M Van den Berg-Vos, M P J Sommers-Spijkerman, C M Van Heugten","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12470-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emotional and cognitive problems are prevalent after stroke. We developed an intervention including screening for emotional and cognitive problems, screening for participation restrictions, self-management support including education and, if needed, referral to rehabilitation services. This intervention was delivered through a nurse-led outpatient consultation at six weeks after stroke. Its effectiveness was examined in a patient-blinded, cluster-randomized controlled trial and its feasibility in a process evaluation. This process evaluation aims to (1) assess the reach, dose and fidelity of the intervention, (2) evaluate barriers and facilitators to implementation and (3) explore experiences from the perspective of healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study was conducted. Specialized nurses offering the intervention completed registration forms to evaluate the reach, dose and fidelity of the intervention. The Barriers and Facilitators Instrument (BFAI) was used to evaluate barriers and facilitators. Furthermore, the specialized nurses participated in a group interview to explore experiences in delivering the intervention. Group interviews were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 262 of 264 patients (99.2%) attended the intervention. In 233 patients (88.9%), all screening instruments were completed. The BFAI demonstrated that the intervention was feasible and was not considered time-consuming or hindered by contextual factors. Barriers to deliver the intervention were limited to patient characteristics. During group interviews, specialized nurses reported that the intervention significantly overlapped with care as usual prior to start of the trial, yet indicated that the intervention provided a more profound understanding of post-stroke sequelae.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of a nurse-led intervention, comprising screening and care for emotional and cognitive problems after stroke, was generally well executed and deemed feasible. If this intervention proves to be clinically and/or cost-effective in our upcoming primary analyses, we will advocate to incorporate it in daily clinical practice and to adhere to the implementation strategy as presented in this process evaluation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered at 25 September 2018 in the Netherlands Trial Register (NL7295).</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"337"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12470-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emotional and cognitive problems are prevalent after stroke. We developed an intervention including screening for emotional and cognitive problems, screening for participation restrictions, self-management support including education and, if needed, referral to rehabilitation services. This intervention was delivered through a nurse-led outpatient consultation at six weeks after stroke. Its effectiveness was examined in a patient-blinded, cluster-randomized controlled trial and its feasibility in a process evaluation. This process evaluation aims to (1) assess the reach, dose and fidelity of the intervention, (2) evaluate barriers and facilitators to implementation and (3) explore experiences from the perspective of healthcare providers.

Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted. Specialized nurses offering the intervention completed registration forms to evaluate the reach, dose and fidelity of the intervention. The Barriers and Facilitators Instrument (BFAI) was used to evaluate barriers and facilitators. Furthermore, the specialized nurses participated in a group interview to explore experiences in delivering the intervention. Group interviews were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results: In total, 262 of 264 patients (99.2%) attended the intervention. In 233 patients (88.9%), all screening instruments were completed. The BFAI demonstrated that the intervention was feasible and was not considered time-consuming or hindered by contextual factors. Barriers to deliver the intervention were limited to patient characteristics. During group interviews, specialized nurses reported that the intervention significantly overlapped with care as usual prior to start of the trial, yet indicated that the intervention provided a more profound understanding of post-stroke sequelae.

Conclusions: The implementation of a nurse-led intervention, comprising screening and care for emotional and cognitive problems after stroke, was generally well executed and deemed feasible. If this intervention proves to be clinically and/or cost-effective in our upcoming primary analyses, we will advocate to incorporate it in daily clinical practice and to adhere to the implementation strategy as presented in this process evaluation.

Trial registration: This study was registered at 25 September 2018 in the Netherlands Trial Register (NL7295).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卒中后情绪和认知问题的筛查和护理:一项前瞻性混合方法过程评价的集群随机对照试验。
背景:中风后情绪和认知问题普遍存在。我们开发了一种干预措施,包括筛选情绪和认知问题,筛选参与限制,自我管理支持,包括教育,如果需要,转介到康复服务。这种干预在中风后六周通过护士领导的门诊会诊进行。在一项患者盲法、集群随机对照试验中检验了其有效性,并在过程评估中验证了其可行性。本过程评估旨在(1)评估干预的范围、剂量和保真度,(2)评估实施的障碍和促进因素,以及(3)从医疗保健提供者的角度探索经验。方法:采用混合方法进行研究。提供干预的专业护士填写登记表,评估干预的范围、剂量和保真度。采用障碍和促进因素量表(BFAI)对障碍和促进因素进行评价。此外,专科护士参加了小组访谈,以探讨实施干预的经验。小组访谈采用归纳主题分析法进行分析。结果:264例患者中有262例(99.2%)参加了干预。233例患者(88.9%)完成了所有筛查工具。BFAI表明干预是可行的,不被认为是耗时的,也不受环境因素的阻碍。实施干预的障碍仅限于患者的特征。在小组访谈中,专业护士报告说,干预与试验开始前的常规护理明显重叠,但表明干预提供了对中风后后遗症的更深刻理解。结论:护士主导的干预措施的实施,包括中风后情绪和认知问题的筛查和护理,总体上执行良好,被认为是可行的。如果该干预措施在我们即将进行的初步分析中被证明具有临床和/或成本效益,我们将提倡将其纳入日常临床实践,并坚持本过程评估中提出的实施策略。试验注册:本研究于2018年9月25日在荷兰试验注册(NL7295)中注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Healthcare professionals' migration intentions in Türkiye: a qualitative study on implications for community health and health system sustainability. A qualitative study of emergency physicians' perspective on the emergency journey of older patients. The cost of heart failure in Australia: a linked primary and secondary care analysis. Thematic characteristics and research hot-spots of China's healthy aging policy: topic modeling study. Prevalence and factors associated with health facility-based deliveries among urban slum settlers in Lubaga Division, Kampala District, Uganda: a community-based cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1