Caring perception questionnaire of the home-dwelling elderly: development and validation study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1186/s12877-025-05785-0
Mingjiao Feng, Lei Huang, Yuqin Chen, Yanjie You, Hongwei Chang, Lihua Zhang, Fengjian Zhang, Yilan Liu
{"title":"Caring perception questionnaire of the home-dwelling elderly: development and validation study.","authors":"Mingjiao Feng, Lei Huang, Yuqin Chen, Yanjie You, Hongwei Chang, Lihua Zhang, Fengjian Zhang, Yilan Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05785-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The care requirements of the elderly who live at home should receive enough attention as the world's population ages. On the basis of this, a questionnaire on the elderly who live at home must be created and validated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective is to create and validate a tool that will allow caregivers to more accurately measure how well-cared-for elderly people perceive them to be at home.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study developed a caring perception questionnaire through literature review and interviews in Wuhan. Fifteen experts from six provinces reviewed the initial 43-item draft. When faulty questionnaires were eliminated, the valid sample size for the exploratory factor analysis of the first survey was 238. For confirmatory factor analysis, the second survey's valid sample size was 260. The final version included 31 items, validated for reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 52-item questionnaire was created based on interviews, refined to 43 items after expert feedback, with a content validity index of 0.88. The first survey (238 valid responses) showed a Cronbach's α of 0.945, and the second (260 valid responses) confirmed good model fit and consistency. The final version has 31 items.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With good reliability and validity, the caring perception questionnaire of the home-dwelling elderly was developed, which could be used as a tool to evaluate the current situation of humanistic care for the home-dwelling elderly.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05785-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The care requirements of the elderly who live at home should receive enough attention as the world's population ages. On the basis of this, a questionnaire on the elderly who live at home must be created and validated.

Objective: The objective is to create and validate a tool that will allow caregivers to more accurately measure how well-cared-for elderly people perceive them to be at home.

Methods: This study developed a caring perception questionnaire through literature review and interviews in Wuhan. Fifteen experts from six provinces reviewed the initial 43-item draft. When faulty questionnaires were eliminated, the valid sample size for the exploratory factor analysis of the first survey was 238. For confirmatory factor analysis, the second survey's valid sample size was 260. The final version included 31 items, validated for reliability and validity.

Results: A 52-item questionnaire was created based on interviews, refined to 43 items after expert feedback, with a content validity index of 0.88. The first survey (238 valid responses) showed a Cronbach's α of 0.945, and the second (260 valid responses) confirmed good model fit and consistency. The final version has 31 items.

Conclusions: With good reliability and validity, the caring perception questionnaire of the home-dwelling elderly was developed, which could be used as a tool to evaluate the current situation of humanistic care for the home-dwelling elderly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
居家老人关爱感知问卷:编制与验证研究。
背景:随着世界人口的老龄化,居家老人的护理需求应该得到足够的重视。在此基础上,必须编制并验证居家老人调查问卷。目的:目的是创建和验证一种工具,使护理人员能够更准确地衡量得到良好照顾的老年人对他们在家的感觉。方法:采用文献资料法和访谈法编制爱心感知问卷。来自6个省的15名专家审查了最初的43项草案。剔除错误问卷后,第一次调查探索性因子分析的有效样本量为238份。对于验证性因子分析,第二次调查的有效样本量为260。最终版本包括31个项目,验证了信度和效度。结果:在访谈的基础上编制了52项问卷,经专家反馈后细化为43项,内容效度指数为0.88。第一次调查(238份有效问卷)的Cronbach's α为0.945,第二次调查(260份有效问卷)的模型拟合和一致性较好。最终版本有31个项目。结论:编制的居家老人关怀感知问卷具有良好的信度和效度,可作为评估居家老人人文关怀现状的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
The impact of an intervention by a mobile geriatrics team including a pharmacist on potentially inappropriate drug prescription: results of the PharMoG study. Medication communication and management: exploring the experiences and observations of older patients with multimorbidity and their families at hospital discharge. Intergenerational communication about advance care planning between older adults and their adult children: a qualitative dyadic study. A Service-Learning Program Based on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Health Promotion in Older Adults: Protocol for the GEROS Project. Lessons learned from social isolation in nursing homes during the COVID-19 epidemic-group interview with relatives with negative experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1