Implantation of trifocal intraocular lens in mild pathologic myopia: visual outcomes and influence of fundus structures.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMC Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1186/s12886-025-03931-1
Meiyi Zhu, Zongsheng Zeng, Wei Fan, Guangbin Zhang
{"title":"Implantation of trifocal intraocular lens in mild pathologic myopia: visual outcomes and influence of fundus structures.","authors":"Meiyi Zhu, Zongsheng Zeng, Wei Fan, Guangbin Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-03931-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the visual outcomes of simple high myopia (HM) and mild pathologic myopia (PM) following implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL), and investigate the influence of fundus structures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied 63 high myopic eyes of 63 patients underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with implantation of AT LISA tri 839MP IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) between July 2020 and September 2024. 34 eyes in the HM group and 29 eyes in the PM group. Main visual outcomes including monocular corrected distance (4 m, CDVA), distance-corrected intermediate (80 cm, DCIVA), distance-corrected near (40 cm, DCNVA) visual acuity, defocus curves, and subjective refraction. Optical coherence tomograph was employed to evaluate macular tilt degree (MTD), central foveal thickness, and subfoveal choroidal thickness. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent predictors of visual acuity in the PM group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CDVA, DCIVA, and DCNVA were 0.00 ± 0.00, 0.08 ± 0.05, and 0.09 ± 0.07 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in the HM group, 0.02 ± 0.05, 0.15 ± 0.09, and 0.17 ± 0.09 logMAR in the PM group, respectively. In the PM group, mean MTD was 17.13 ± 6.79°. The MTD demonstrated a significant predictive effect on CDVA (regression coefficient: 0.005; P = 0.026) and DCNVA (regression coefficient: 0.015; P = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trifocal IOL implantation yielded favorable visual outcomes in simple high myopic eyes, though results were comparatively poorer in PM cases. MTD was associated with the expected visual outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-03931-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the visual outcomes of simple high myopia (HM) and mild pathologic myopia (PM) following implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL), and investigate the influence of fundus structures.

Methods: We retrospectively studied 63 high myopic eyes of 63 patients underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with implantation of AT LISA tri 839MP IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) between July 2020 and September 2024. 34 eyes in the HM group and 29 eyes in the PM group. Main visual outcomes including monocular corrected distance (4 m, CDVA), distance-corrected intermediate (80 cm, DCIVA), distance-corrected near (40 cm, DCNVA) visual acuity, defocus curves, and subjective refraction. Optical coherence tomograph was employed to evaluate macular tilt degree (MTD), central foveal thickness, and subfoveal choroidal thickness. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent predictors of visual acuity in the PM group.

Results: The CDVA, DCIVA, and DCNVA were 0.00 ± 0.00, 0.08 ± 0.05, and 0.09 ± 0.07 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in the HM group, 0.02 ± 0.05, 0.15 ± 0.09, and 0.17 ± 0.09 logMAR in the PM group, respectively. In the PM group, mean MTD was 17.13 ± 6.79°. The MTD demonstrated a significant predictive effect on CDVA (regression coefficient: 0.005; P = 0.026) and DCNVA (regression coefficient: 0.015; P = 0.003).

Conclusion: Trifocal IOL implantation yielded favorable visual outcomes in simple high myopic eyes, though results were comparatively poorer in PM cases. MTD was associated with the expected visual outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻度病理性近视三焦人工晶状体植入术:视力结果及眼底结构的影响。
目的:比较单纯性高度近视(HM)和轻度病理性近视(PM)植入术后的视力结果,并探讨眼底结构的影响。方法:回顾性研究2020年7月至2024年9月63例高度近视患者的63只眼,这些患者接受飞秒激光辅助白内障手术并植入AT LISA三颗839MP人工晶体(德国卡尔蔡司医学股份公司)。HM组34眼,PM组29眼。主要视力指标包括单眼矫正距离(4 m, CDVA)、距离矫正中间距离(80 cm, DCIVA)、距离矫正近距离(40 cm, DCNVA)视力、离焦曲线和主观屈光度。采用光学相干断层扫描评估黄斑倾斜度(MTD)、中央凹厚度、中央凹下脉络膜厚度。采用多元线性回归分析评估PM组视力的独立预测因素。结果:HM组的CDVA、DCIVA、DCNVA分别为最小分辨角(logMAR)的0.00±0.00、0.08±0.05、0.09±0.07对数,PM组的CDVA、DCIVA、DCNVA分别为0.02±0.05、0.15±0.09、0.17±0.09对数。PM组平均MTD为17.13±6.79°。MTD对CDVA有显著的预测作用(回归系数:0.005;P = 0.026)和DCNVA(回归系数:0.015;p = 0.003)。结论:单纯性高度近视患者植入术效果较好,而PM患者植入术效果较差。MTD与预期的视觉结果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
A clinical prediction tool for ocular hypertension following silicone oil tamponade in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. A novel optical sign in keratoconus: the Halo Sign and its clinical characteristics. Two-stage diagnostic intervals in diabetic retinopathy and associated factors: a cross-sectional study. Visual acuity and retinal thickness outcomes following anti-VEGF therapy in RVO: influence of early vs. delayed treatment. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prognosis of ocular trauma: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1