Martijn J H van Oort, Brian O Bingen, Federico Oliveri, Ibtihal Al Amri, Akshay A S Phagu, Bimmer E P M Claessen, Aukelien C Dimitriu-Leen, Tessel N Vossenberg, Joelle Kefer, Hany Girgis, Frank van der Kley, J Wouter Jukema, Jose M Montero-Cabezas
{"title":"Clinical and Technical Predictors of Treatment Success After Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy in Calcific Coronary Lesions.","authors":"Martijn J H van Oort, Brian O Bingen, Federico Oliveri, Ibtihal Al Amri, Akshay A S Phagu, Bimmer E P M Claessen, Aukelien C Dimitriu-Leen, Tessel N Vossenberg, Joelle Kefer, Hany Girgis, Frank van der Kley, J Wouter Jukema, Jose M Montero-Cabezas","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is increasingly used to treat coronary artery calcification (CAC). This study aimed to identify clinical and procedural factors associated with IVL treatment success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 454 patients (73 ± 9 years, 75% male) treated with IVL from the multicenter BENELUX-IVL registry (May 2019 to February 2024). Treatment success was defined as achieving residual coronary diameter stenosis < 30% and luminal gain, assessed by quantitative coronary analysis (QCA). Linear and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean luminal gain was 1.9 ± 0.9 mm, and residual diameter stenosis < 30% was achieved in 354 (90%) lesions. Stenting after IVL for therapy completion (p < 0.001), intracoronary imaging (ICI) guidance (p = 0.024) and chronic total occlusions (CTOs; p < 0.001) were associated with increased luminal gain, while bifurcation lesions (p = 0.029) were associated with decreased luminal gain. Long (> 20 mm) lesions (p = 0.034) and post-IVL stenting for therapy completion (p = 0.041) were associated with a residual diameter stenosis < 30%, while aorto-ostial lesions (p = 0.014) were negatively associated with this outcome. Technical IVL parameters such as inflation pressure and number of pulses delivered were not significantly associated with treatment success.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stenting after IVL for therapy completion, ICI guidance and CTOs were associated with increased luminal gain, while bifurcation lesions were linked to decreased luminal gain. Long lesions and post-IVL stenting for therapy completion were associated with residual diameter stenosis < 30%, while the presence of aorto-ostial lesions was negatively associated with this outcome. Technical IVL-related procedural factors did not significantly impact treatment success.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31480","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is increasingly used to treat coronary artery calcification (CAC). This study aimed to identify clinical and procedural factors associated with IVL treatment success.
Methods: This retrospective analysis included 454 patients (73 ± 9 years, 75% male) treated with IVL from the multicenter BENELUX-IVL registry (May 2019 to February 2024). Treatment success was defined as achieving residual coronary diameter stenosis < 30% and luminal gain, assessed by quantitative coronary analysis (QCA). Linear and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with these outcomes.
Results: The mean luminal gain was 1.9 ± 0.9 mm, and residual diameter stenosis < 30% was achieved in 354 (90%) lesions. Stenting after IVL for therapy completion (p < 0.001), intracoronary imaging (ICI) guidance (p = 0.024) and chronic total occlusions (CTOs; p < 0.001) were associated with increased luminal gain, while bifurcation lesions (p = 0.029) were associated with decreased luminal gain. Long (> 20 mm) lesions (p = 0.034) and post-IVL stenting for therapy completion (p = 0.041) were associated with a residual diameter stenosis < 30%, while aorto-ostial lesions (p = 0.014) were negatively associated with this outcome. Technical IVL parameters such as inflation pressure and number of pulses delivered were not significantly associated with treatment success.
Conclusion: Stenting after IVL for therapy completion, ICI guidance and CTOs were associated with increased luminal gain, while bifurcation lesions were linked to decreased luminal gain. Long lesions and post-IVL stenting for therapy completion were associated with residual diameter stenosis < 30%, while the presence of aorto-ostial lesions was negatively associated with this outcome. Technical IVL-related procedural factors did not significantly impact treatment success.
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.