How does pole length affect lower back muscle activity at different inclines and skiing intensities during double poling?

IF 2.6 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-02-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2025.1438386
Marie Lund Ohlsson, Marcus Nilsson, Mikael Swarén
{"title":"How does pole length affect lower back muscle activity at different inclines and skiing intensities during double poling?","authors":"Marie Lund Ohlsson, Marcus Nilsson, Mikael Swarén","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2025.1438386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate how pole length, incline, and skiing intensity affect lower back muscle activation in elite cross-country skiers. This addressing a critical gap in understanding the biomechanical demands and risk of low back pain of double poling (DP).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eleven elite cross-country skiers performed skiing trials on a treadmill, varying in incline (flat vs. 6°), intensity (two self-selected speeds, training speed and racing speed), and pole lengths. Muscle activity was measured by surface electromyography on the erector spinae thoracic and lumbar muscles, on the left and right side. A motion capture system was used for kinematic analysis of the lower back-pole moment arm and the hip angle during the DP cycle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to men, female skiers had a significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.001), overall muscle activation for the m. erector spinae lumbar on both the left and right side (26% of MVC vs. 15% of MVC, and 28% of MVC vs. 22% of MVC, for the left and right side, respectively). No correlations were found, neither between muscle activation to the lower back-pole moment arm, or to the hip angle.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that female skiers experience significantly higher lumbar erector spinae activation during DP, potentially indicating greater susceptibility to back-related issues. The results also highlight the need to tailor training and right adapted equipment to mitigate lower back stress, especially in flat terrain high-intensity conditions. The asymmetrical muscle activity and gender differences underscores the need for further investigation into biomechanical factors influencing back muscle engagement in cross-country skiing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"7 ","pages":"1438386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1438386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate how pole length, incline, and skiing intensity affect lower back muscle activation in elite cross-country skiers. This addressing a critical gap in understanding the biomechanical demands and risk of low back pain of double poling (DP).

Method: Eleven elite cross-country skiers performed skiing trials on a treadmill, varying in incline (flat vs. 6°), intensity (two self-selected speeds, training speed and racing speed), and pole lengths. Muscle activity was measured by surface electromyography on the erector spinae thoracic and lumbar muscles, on the left and right side. A motion capture system was used for kinematic analysis of the lower back-pole moment arm and the hip angle during the DP cycle.

Results: Compared to men, female skiers had a significantly higher (p < 0.001), overall muscle activation for the m. erector spinae lumbar on both the left and right side (26% of MVC vs. 15% of MVC, and 28% of MVC vs. 22% of MVC, for the left and right side, respectively). No correlations were found, neither between muscle activation to the lower back-pole moment arm, or to the hip angle.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that female skiers experience significantly higher lumbar erector spinae activation during DP, potentially indicating greater susceptibility to back-related issues. The results also highlight the need to tailor training and right adapted equipment to mitigate lower back stress, especially in flat terrain high-intensity conditions. The asymmetrical muscle activity and gender differences underscores the need for further investigation into biomechanical factors influencing back muscle engagement in cross-country skiing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
竿长如何影响下背部肌肉活动在不同的倾斜度和滑雪强度在双竿?
目的:本研究旨在探讨滑雪杆长度、坡度和滑雪强度对优秀越野滑雪运动员下背部肌肉激活的影响。这解决了在理解双撑杆(DP)的生物力学要求和腰痛风险方面的一个关键空白。方法:11名优秀的越野滑雪运动员在跑步机上进行滑雪试验,不同的坡度(平与6°),强度(两种自选速度,训练速度和比赛速度)和杆长。通过表面肌电图测量左、右侧竖脊、胸肌和腰肌的肌肉活动。采用运动捕捉系统对下后极力臂和髋部角度进行运动学分析。结果:与男性相比,女性滑雪者有明显更高的(p)。结论:研究结果表明,女性滑雪者在DP期间经历了明显更高的腰竖脊肌激活,可能表明更容易出现背部相关问题。研究结果还强调,需要量身定制训练和合适的装备来减轻腰背压力,特别是在平坦地形高强度条件下。不对称的肌肉活动和性别差异强调了进一步研究影响越野滑雪背部肌肉活动的生物力学因素的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Progress on exercise therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus with cognitive impairment. Influence of foot arch height on isokinetic knee muscle strength at varying angular velocities. Interaction of target distance and movement type on lower limb kinematics in fencing. Improvements in body composition, functional capacity, and cardiovascular fitness: results of a workplace wellness program in the United Arab Emirates. Participation, community and affirmation: parent accounts of supporting transgender children in sport and dance participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1