Clinical application of targeted next-generation sequencing in pneumonia diagnosis among cancer patients.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-02-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcimb.2025.1497198
Ke Yang, Jiuzhou Zhao, Tingjie Wang, Zhizhong Wang, Rui Sun, Dejian Gu, Hao Liu, Weizhen Wang, Cuiyun Zhang, Chengzhi Zhao, Yongjun Guo, Jie Ma, Bing Wei
{"title":"Clinical application of targeted next-generation sequencing in pneumonia diagnosis among cancer patients.","authors":"Ke Yang, Jiuzhou Zhao, Tingjie Wang, Zhizhong Wang, Rui Sun, Dejian Gu, Hao Liu, Weizhen Wang, Cuiyun Zhang, Chengzhi Zhao, Yongjun Guo, Jie Ma, Bing Wei","doi":"10.3389/fcimb.2025.1497198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer patients are highly susceptible to infections due to their immunocompromised state from both the malignancy and intensive treatments. Accurate and timely identification of causative pathogens is crucial for effective management and treatment. Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) has become an important tool in clinical infectious disease diagnosis because of its broad microbial detection range and acceptable cost. However, there is currently a lack of systematic research to evaluate the diagnostic value of this method in cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic value of tNGS for cancer patients with pneumonia, a retrospective analysis was conducted on 148 patients with suspected pneumonia who were treated at the Henan Cancer Hospital. The tNGS results were compared with conventional microbiological tests (CMT) and clinical diagnoses based on symptoms and imaging studies to assess the diagnostic performance of tNGS in cancer patients with pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among these 148 patients, 130 were ultimately diagnosed with pneumonia. tNGS demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (84.62% vs. 56.92%) and diagnostic accuracy (85.81% vs. 62.16%) compared to the CMT method. The tNGS method identified more pathogens than CMT method (87.50% vs 57.14%), regardless of whether they were bacteria, fungi, or viruses, primarily due to its broader pathogen detection range and higher sensitivity compared to the CMT method. tNGS had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy for <i>Pneumocystis jirovecii</i> and <i>Legionella pneumophil</i>a than the CMT method, but for most pathogens, tNGS showed higher sensitivity but with a correspondingly lower specificity compared to CMT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>tNGS demonstrates higher sensitivity and a broader pathogen detection spectrum compared to CMT, making it a valuable diagnostic tool for managing pneumonia in cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12458,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1497198"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1497198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer patients are highly susceptible to infections due to their immunocompromised state from both the malignancy and intensive treatments. Accurate and timely identification of causative pathogens is crucial for effective management and treatment. Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) has become an important tool in clinical infectious disease diagnosis because of its broad microbial detection range and acceptable cost. However, there is currently a lack of systematic research to evaluate the diagnostic value of this method in cancer patients.

Methods: To evaluate the diagnostic value of tNGS for cancer patients with pneumonia, a retrospective analysis was conducted on 148 patients with suspected pneumonia who were treated at the Henan Cancer Hospital. The tNGS results were compared with conventional microbiological tests (CMT) and clinical diagnoses based on symptoms and imaging studies to assess the diagnostic performance of tNGS in cancer patients with pneumonia.

Results: Among these 148 patients, 130 were ultimately diagnosed with pneumonia. tNGS demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (84.62% vs. 56.92%) and diagnostic accuracy (85.81% vs. 62.16%) compared to the CMT method. The tNGS method identified more pathogens than CMT method (87.50% vs 57.14%), regardless of whether they were bacteria, fungi, or viruses, primarily due to its broader pathogen detection range and higher sensitivity compared to the CMT method. tNGS had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy for Pneumocystis jirovecii and Legionella pneumophila than the CMT method, but for most pathogens, tNGS showed higher sensitivity but with a correspondingly lower specificity compared to CMT.

Conclusion: tNGS demonstrates higher sensitivity and a broader pathogen detection spectrum compared to CMT, making it a valuable diagnostic tool for managing pneumonia in cancer patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
靶向新一代测序在癌症患者肺炎诊断中的临床应用。
背景:肿瘤患者由于恶性肿瘤和强化治疗导致免疫功能低下,极易发生感染。准确和及时地识别致病病原体对于有效的管理和治疗至关重要。靶向新一代测序(tNGS)因其广泛的微生物检测范围和可接受的成本,已成为临床传染病诊断的重要工具。然而,目前还缺乏系统的研究来评估该方法对癌症患者的诊断价值。方法:对河南省肿瘤医院收治的148例疑似肺炎患者进行回顾性分析,以评价tNGS对肿瘤合并肺炎的诊断价值。将tNGS结果与常规微生物试验(CMT)和基于症状和影像学检查的临床诊断进行比较,以评估tNGS对癌症合并肺炎患者的诊断效果。结果:148例患者中,130例最终诊断为肺炎。与CMT相比,tNGS的敏感性(84.62% vs. 56.92%)和诊断准确性(85.81% vs. 62.16%)显著提高。无论是细菌、真菌还是病毒,tNGS方法都比CMT方法鉴定出更多的病原体(87.50% vs 57.14%),这主要是由于tNGS方法的病原体检测范围比CMT方法更广,灵敏度更高。与CMT相比,tNGS对耶氏肺囊虫和嗜肺军团菌的诊断准确率明显高于CMT,但对大多数病原体,tNGS的敏感性较高,但特异性相应较低。结论:与CMT相比,tNGS具有更高的灵敏度和更广泛的病原体检测谱,是治疗癌症患者肺炎的有价值的诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
1817
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology is a leading specialty journal, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across all pathogenic microorganisms and their interaction with their hosts. Chief Editor Yousef Abu Kwaik, University of Louisville is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology includes research on bacteria, fungi, parasites, viruses, endosymbionts, prions and all microbial pathogens as well as the microbiota and its effect on health and disease in various hosts. The research approaches include molecular microbiology, cellular microbiology, gene regulation, proteomics, signal transduction, pathogenic evolution, genomics, structural biology, and virulence factors as well as model hosts. Areas of research to counteract infectious agents by the host include the host innate and adaptive immune responses as well as metabolic restrictions to various pathogenic microorganisms, vaccine design and development against various pathogenic microorganisms, and the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and its countermeasures.
期刊最新文献
Porphyromonas gingivalis infection induces lysine lactylation reprogramming in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Clinical characteristics and prognostic impact of Burkholderia cepacia complex colonization and infection in patients with hematologic malignancies. From virtual screening to animal models: chlorhexidine and indinavir as promising anti-Zika drug candidates. Gut microbiota as a key regulator in endometriosis: mechanisms, therapeutic opportunities, and future perspectives. Correction: Utility of multi-target nested PCR and ELISPOT assays for the detection of paucibacillary leprosy: a possible conclusion of clinical laboratory misdiagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1