{"title":"Application of Neurophysiological Monitoring and Ultrasound Guidance in Intramedullary Decompression for Acute Spinal Cord Injury.","authors":"Haoyuan Wang, Zhao Chen, Xianxiang Wang, Yiquan Zhang, Hui Wang, Ke Zhang","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S495371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the clinical application value of neurophysiological monitoring combined with ultrasound guidance in Acute spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten patients with acute spinal cord injury underwent intramedullary decompression surgery under neurophysiological monitoring and intraoperative ultrasound guidance. ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) classification and JOA (Japan Orthopaedic Association) scoring were performed preoperatively and postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preoperative, 1-week postoperative, and 1-year postoperative JOA scores for the ten patients were (6.2 ± 1.55), (7 ± 1.58), and (11.8 ± 1.60), respectively. The JOA improvement rates at 1 week and 1 year postoperation were 7.4% and 51.9%, respectively. Among the patients, one patient had severe thoracic spinal cord injury upon admission, and their ASIA classification remained at Grade A after 1 year postoperation, while the remaining nine patients showed varying degrees of neurological function improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring combined with intraoperative ultrasound not only allows for timely monitoring of spinal cord function but also enables observation of whether decompression is adequate during surgery. It represents a very good surgical option for patients with spinal cord injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"1155-1161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S495371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To explore the clinical application value of neurophysiological monitoring combined with ultrasound guidance in Acute spinal cord injury.
Methods: Ten patients with acute spinal cord injury underwent intramedullary decompression surgery under neurophysiological monitoring and intraoperative ultrasound guidance. ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) classification and JOA (Japan Orthopaedic Association) scoring were performed preoperatively and postoperatively.
Results: The preoperative, 1-week postoperative, and 1-year postoperative JOA scores for the ten patients were (6.2 ± 1.55), (7 ± 1.58), and (11.8 ± 1.60), respectively. The JOA improvement rates at 1 week and 1 year postoperation were 7.4% and 51.9%, respectively. Among the patients, one patient had severe thoracic spinal cord injury upon admission, and their ASIA classification remained at Grade A after 1 year postoperation, while the remaining nine patients showed varying degrees of neurological function improvement.
Conclusion: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring combined with intraoperative ultrasound not only allows for timely monitoring of spinal cord function but also enables observation of whether decompression is adequate during surgery. It represents a very good surgical option for patients with spinal cord injuries.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas.
A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.