In vivo evaluation of cefazolin inoculum effect in the treatment of experimental Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia with cefazolin.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1093/jac/dkaf065
Soon Ok Lee, Shinwon Lee, Sohee Park, Jeong Eun Lee, Sun Hee Lee
{"title":"In vivo evaluation of cefazolin inoculum effect in the treatment of experimental Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia with cefazolin.","authors":"Soon Ok Lee, Shinwon Lee, Sohee Park, Jeong Eun Lee, Sun Hee Lee","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared the efficacy of cefazolin in a mouse pneumonia model caused by a methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) strain with cefazolin inoculum effect (CIE) and its blaZ-eliminated derivative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An isogenic blaZ gene-eliminated strain was derived from type A blaZ-positive MSSA blood isolates exhibiting CIE: PNIDSA230 (parental strain, CIE+) and PNIDSA230c (blaZ-eliminated strain, CIE-). Mice were inoculated with 2 × 10⁶ to 2 × 10⁷ cfu of MSSA via endotracheal tubes and treated with intraperitoneal cefazolin or oxacillin 5 h post-inoculation. Bacterial loads in the lungs (primary sites), liver, and kidneys (metastatic foci) were measured 24 h later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cefazolin reduced bacterial densities in the lungs of CIE-positive MSSA-infected mice (n = 11) compared with untreated controls (n = 11) (mean log10 cfu/g ± SD, 6.0 ± 1.6 versus 9.4 ± 2.7; P = 0.006). However, the efficacy of cefazolin was significantly lower in CIE+ infections than in CIE- infections (mean log10 cfu/g ± SD, 6.0 ± 1.6 versus 4.4 ± 0.8, P = 0.0258). Cefazolin-treated CIE- MSSA-infected mice showed no metastatic infections, while 7 of the 11 CIE+ MSSA-infected mice developed liver or kidney infections despite cefazolin treatment. Oxacillin treatment significantly reduced bacterial densities of the lungs, liver, and kidney in CIE-positive (n = 4) and CIE-negative (n = 4) MSSA-infected mice, with no significant differences between CIE-positive and CIE-negative MSSA infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CIE may diminish cefazolin's efficacy in severe MSSA infections and contribute to the development of metastatic infection foci. Oxacillin remains effective regardless of CIE status.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the efficacy of cefazolin in a mouse pneumonia model caused by a methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) strain with cefazolin inoculum effect (CIE) and its blaZ-eliminated derivative.

Methods: An isogenic blaZ gene-eliminated strain was derived from type A blaZ-positive MSSA blood isolates exhibiting CIE: PNIDSA230 (parental strain, CIE+) and PNIDSA230c (blaZ-eliminated strain, CIE-). Mice were inoculated with 2 × 10⁶ to 2 × 10⁷ cfu of MSSA via endotracheal tubes and treated with intraperitoneal cefazolin or oxacillin 5 h post-inoculation. Bacterial loads in the lungs (primary sites), liver, and kidneys (metastatic foci) were measured 24 h later.

Results: Cefazolin reduced bacterial densities in the lungs of CIE-positive MSSA-infected mice (n = 11) compared with untreated controls (n = 11) (mean log10 cfu/g ± SD, 6.0 ± 1.6 versus 9.4 ± 2.7; P = 0.006). However, the efficacy of cefazolin was significantly lower in CIE+ infections than in CIE- infections (mean log10 cfu/g ± SD, 6.0 ± 1.6 versus 4.4 ± 0.8, P = 0.0258). Cefazolin-treated CIE- MSSA-infected mice showed no metastatic infections, while 7 of the 11 CIE+ MSSA-infected mice developed liver or kidney infections despite cefazolin treatment. Oxacillin treatment significantly reduced bacterial densities of the lungs, liver, and kidney in CIE-positive (n = 4) and CIE-negative (n = 4) MSSA-infected mice, with no significant differences between CIE-positive and CIE-negative MSSA infections.

Conclusions: CIE may diminish cefazolin's efficacy in severe MSSA infections and contribute to the development of metastatic infection foci. Oxacillin remains effective regardless of CIE status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
期刊最新文献
Vonoprazan improves the efficacy of bismuth quadruple therapy containing doxycycline and metronidazole as first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment in penicillin-allergic patients: a randomized controlled trial. Identification of the czc metal efflux operon on a new plasmid type in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolate belonging to ST357 O11. In vivo evaluation of cefazolin inoculum effect in the treatment of experimental Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia with cefazolin. Cellular pharmacology of tenofovir alafenamide and emtricitabine in neutrophils and platelets in people with and without HIV. Comment on: Antiviral effect of Evusheld in COVID-19 hospitalized patients infected with pre-Omicron or Omicron variants: a modelling analysis of the randomized DisCoVeRy trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1