Anthony Jaillat, Catherine Cyteval, Marie-Pierre Baron Sarrabere, Hamza Ghomrani, Yoav Maman, Yann Thouvenin, Maxime Pastor
{"title":"Added value of artificial intelligence for the detection of pelvic and hip fractures.","authors":"Anthony Jaillat, Catherine Cyteval, Marie-Pierre Baron Sarrabere, Hamza Ghomrani, Yoav Maman, Yann Thouvenin, Maxime Pastor","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01754-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the added value of artificial intelligence (AI) for radiologists and emergency physicians in the radiographic detection of pelvic fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, one junior radiologist reviewed 940 X-rays of patients admitted to emergency for a fall with suspicion of pelvic fracture between March 2020 and June 2021. The radiologist analyzed the X-rays alone and then using an AI system (BoneView). In a random sample of 100 exams, the same procedure was repeated alongside five other readers (three radiologists and two emergency physicians with 3-30 years of experience). The reference diagnosis was based on the patient's full set of medical imaging exams and medical records in the months following emergency admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 633 confirmed pelvic fractures (64.8% from hip and 35.2% from pelvic ring) in 940 patients and 68 pelvic fractures (60% from hip and 40% from pelvic ring) in the 100-patient sample were included. In the whole dataset, the junior radiologist achieved a significant sensitivity improvement with AI assistance (Se<sub>-PELVIC</sub> = 77.25% to 83.73%; p < 0.001, Se<sub>-HIP</sub> 93.24 to 96.49%; p < 0.001 and Se<sub>-PELVIC RING</sub> 54.60% to 64.50%; p < 0.001). However, there was a significant decrease in specificity with AI assistance (Spe<sub>-PELVIC</sub> = 95.24% to 93.25%; p = 0.005 and Spe<sub>-HIP</sub> = 98.30% to 96.90%; p = 0.005). In the 100-patient sample, the two emergency physicians obtained an improvement in fracture detection sensitivity across the pelvic area + 14.70% (p = 0.0011) and + 10.29% (p < 0.007) respectively without a significant decrease in specificity. For hip fractures, E1's sensitivity increased from 59.46% to 70.27% (p = 0.04), and E2's sensitivity increased from 78.38% to 86.49% (p = 0.08). For pelvic ring fractures, E1's sensitivity increased from 12.90% to 32.26% (p = 0.012), and E2's sensitivity increased from 19.35% to 32.26% (p = 0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI improved the diagnostic performance for emergency physicians and radiologists with limited experience in pelvic fracture screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01754-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the added value of artificial intelligence (AI) for radiologists and emergency physicians in the radiographic detection of pelvic fractures.
Materials & methods: In this retrospective study, one junior radiologist reviewed 940 X-rays of patients admitted to emergency for a fall with suspicion of pelvic fracture between March 2020 and June 2021. The radiologist analyzed the X-rays alone and then using an AI system (BoneView). In a random sample of 100 exams, the same procedure was repeated alongside five other readers (three radiologists and two emergency physicians with 3-30 years of experience). The reference diagnosis was based on the patient's full set of medical imaging exams and medical records in the months following emergency admission.
Results: A total of 633 confirmed pelvic fractures (64.8% from hip and 35.2% from pelvic ring) in 940 patients and 68 pelvic fractures (60% from hip and 40% from pelvic ring) in the 100-patient sample were included. In the whole dataset, the junior radiologist achieved a significant sensitivity improvement with AI assistance (Se-PELVIC = 77.25% to 83.73%; p < 0.001, Se-HIP 93.24 to 96.49%; p < 0.001 and Se-PELVIC RING 54.60% to 64.50%; p < 0.001). However, there was a significant decrease in specificity with AI assistance (Spe-PELVIC = 95.24% to 93.25%; p = 0.005 and Spe-HIP = 98.30% to 96.90%; p = 0.005). In the 100-patient sample, the two emergency physicians obtained an improvement in fracture detection sensitivity across the pelvic area + 14.70% (p = 0.0011) and + 10.29% (p < 0.007) respectively without a significant decrease in specificity. For hip fractures, E1's sensitivity increased from 59.46% to 70.27% (p = 0.04), and E2's sensitivity increased from 78.38% to 86.49% (p = 0.08). For pelvic ring fractures, E1's sensitivity increased from 12.90% to 32.26% (p = 0.012), and E2's sensitivity increased from 19.35% to 32.26% (p = 0.043).
Conclusion: AI improved the diagnostic performance for emergency physicians and radiologists with limited experience in pelvic fracture screening.
期刊介绍:
Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.