Establishing Competency Assessment Standards for Graduating Neurosurgery, Plastic Surgery, and Orthopedic Surgery Residents in Peripheral Nerve Surgery.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Operative Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1227/ons.0000000000001521
Janissardhar Skulsampaopol, Yu Ming, Michael D Cusimano
{"title":"Establishing Competency Assessment Standards for Graduating Neurosurgery, Plastic Surgery, and Orthopedic Surgery Residents in Peripheral Nerve Surgery.","authors":"Janissardhar Skulsampaopol, Yu Ming, Michael D Cusimano","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Peripheral nerve decompression (PND), including carpal tunnel release and ulnar nerve decompression, is a common procedure performed by neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and plastic surgeons. Because of the lack of established assessment parameters and performance standards for Entrustable Professional Activities in PND in the current literature, we conducted this study to define these assessment parameters and identify the expected standards of performance for graduating residents across the fields of neurosurgery, plastic surgery, and orthopedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic survey was sent to neurosurgery, plastic surgery, and orthopedic surgery faculty to obtain their perspectives on parameters of assessment and the expected standard competence performance regarding PND.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one participants returned fully completed questionnaires giving a completion rate of 53%. The overall recommended number of assessments was 5, and the recommended number of assessors was 2. Regarding each specialty, there was no significant difference in the recommended number of assessments; however, neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons recommended a significantly fewer median number of assessors (n = 2) than plastic surgeons (n = 3) ( P = .01). Based on total responses, 77% believed that PND was appropriate for the general practice of their specialties. The majority of respondents expected graduating residents to achieve level E (50.8%) or level D (42.6%) for PND. There was no significant difference in the belief that PND was appropriate for general practice of their specialty or considering entrustment level E as a graduation target across the specialties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found significant agreement across specialties in the parameters of assessment expected of residents and the expected levels of mastery for independent practice. These results are relevant to residency programs and certification bodies like the American Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education in designing the assessment of milestones related to peripheral nerve surgery. This study has important implications for the design of residency and fellowship education in peripheral nerve surgery internationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":54254,"journal":{"name":"Operative Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"686-695"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001521","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Peripheral nerve decompression (PND), including carpal tunnel release and ulnar nerve decompression, is a common procedure performed by neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and plastic surgeons. Because of the lack of established assessment parameters and performance standards for Entrustable Professional Activities in PND in the current literature, we conducted this study to define these assessment parameters and identify the expected standards of performance for graduating residents across the fields of neurosurgery, plastic surgery, and orthopedic surgery.

Methods: Electronic survey was sent to neurosurgery, plastic surgery, and orthopedic surgery faculty to obtain their perspectives on parameters of assessment and the expected standard competence performance regarding PND.

Results: Sixty-one participants returned fully completed questionnaires giving a completion rate of 53%. The overall recommended number of assessments was 5, and the recommended number of assessors was 2. Regarding each specialty, there was no significant difference in the recommended number of assessments; however, neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons recommended a significantly fewer median number of assessors (n = 2) than plastic surgeons (n = 3) ( P = .01). Based on total responses, 77% believed that PND was appropriate for the general practice of their specialties. The majority of respondents expected graduating residents to achieve level E (50.8%) or level D (42.6%) for PND. There was no significant difference in the belief that PND was appropriate for general practice of their specialty or considering entrustment level E as a graduation target across the specialties.

Conclusion: Our study found significant agreement across specialties in the parameters of assessment expected of residents and the expected levels of mastery for independent practice. These results are relevant to residency programs and certification bodies like the American Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education in designing the assessment of milestones related to peripheral nerve surgery. This study has important implications for the design of residency and fellowship education in peripheral nerve surgery internationally.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立神经外科、整形外科及整形外科周围神经外科毕业住院医师能力评估标准。
背景和目的:周围神经减压术(PND),包括腕管减压术和尺神经减压术,是神经外科医生、骨科医生和整形外科医生常用的手术。由于目前文献中缺乏对PND中可信赖的专业活动的既定评估参数和绩效标准,我们进行了这项研究,以定义这些评估参数,并确定神经外科、整形外科和整形外科领域毕业住院医师的预期绩效标准。方法:对神经外科、整形外科和骨科院系进行电子问卷调查,了解他们对PND的评估参数和期望的标准能力表现的看法。结果:61名参与者完整填写了问卷,完成率为53%。总体建议评估次数为5次,建议评估人员数量为2人。各专科的推荐评估次数无显著差异;然而,神经外科医生和骨科医生推荐的评估员中位数(n = 2)明显少于整形外科医生(n = 3) (P = 0.01)。根据总反应,77%的人认为PND适合他们专业的一般实践。大多数受访者期望毕业居民的PND达到E级(50.8%)或D级(42.6%)。在认为PND适合其专业的一般实践或将委托水平E作为毕业目标方面,各专业之间没有显着差异。结论:我们的研究发现,各专业在住院医师期望的评估参数和独立实践的预期掌握水平方面存在显著的一致性。这些结果与住院医师计划和认证机构,如美国研究生医学教育认证委员会,在设计与周围神经手术相关的里程碑评估时相关。本研究对国际上周围神经外科住院医师及奖学金教育的设计具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Operative Neurosurgery
Operative Neurosurgery Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.00%
发文量
530
期刊介绍: Operative Neurosurgery is a bi-monthly, unique publication focusing exclusively on surgical technique and devices, providing practical, skill-enhancing guidance to its readers. Complementing the clinical and research studies published in Neurosurgery, Operative Neurosurgery brings the reader technical material that highlights operative procedures, anatomy, instrumentation, devices, and technology. Operative Neurosurgery is the practical resource for cutting-edge material that brings the surgeon the most up to date literature on operative practice and technique
期刊最新文献
Resection of a Cervical Spine Hemangioblastoma in Von Hippel-Lindau Disease: 2-Dimensional Operative Video. Transfrontal Endoscopic Endoport Approach for Gross Total Resection of a Panventricular Central Neurocytoma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video. Ventral Thoracic Cord Herniation Repair: 2-Dimensional Operative Video. Macrovascular Decompression of the Optic Nerve: Technical Case Instruction: 2-Dimensional Operative Video. Endoscopic Right-Sided Transforaminal T8-T9 Microdiskectomy: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1