The familial aggregation and co-aggregation of drug use disorder and alcohol use disorder in siblings of affected individuals born 1950-1990: A birth cohort exposed to rising rates of drug use disorder.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1017/S0033291725000327
Kenneth S Kendler, Linda Abrahamsson, Jan Sundquist, Kristina Sundquist
{"title":"The familial aggregation and co-aggregation of drug use disorder and alcohol use disorder in siblings of affected individuals born 1950-1990: A birth cohort exposed to rising rates of drug use disorder.","authors":"Kenneth S Kendler, Linda Abrahamsson, Jan Sundquist, Kristina Sundquist","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725000327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We seek to clarify how changes in the prevalence of drug use disorder (DUD) in Sweden in the 1950-1990 birth cohort impact the aggregation and co-aggregation in siblings of DUD and alcohol use disorder (AUD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined risk for DUD and AUD in siblings of 102,624 DUD cases and matched control probands and 123,837 AUD case and matched control probands identified using Swedish registries. Flexible parametric survival models assessed the difference in disorder risk in siblings of case versus control probands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over birthyears 1950-1990, rates of DUD increased substantially in the Swedish population. In siblings of DUD cases versus controls, the risk for DUD increased dramatically starting in birthyear 1965 while their risk for AUD fell moderately. A similar, but less pronounced pattern, was seen in the siblings of AUD versus control probands. These differences were much larger in male than in female siblings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The factors that drove upward population rates of DUD in Sweden (e.g. increased availability, reduced stigma) produced much stronger effects in high-risk subjects (siblings of DUD and AUD probands) than in normal risk groups (siblings of controls), thereby increasing familial aggregation of DUD. However, parallel declines in AUD rates in high-risk versus normal-risk siblings were observed, likely due to 'competitive effects' reducing coaggregation of DUD and AUD. Results of genetic studies of substance use disorders can be substantially impacted by changes in availability and stigma of psychoactive substance use and indirectly by 'competition' as predicted by behavioral economic models, between abusable substances.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e72"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12055021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725000327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We seek to clarify how changes in the prevalence of drug use disorder (DUD) in Sweden in the 1950-1990 birth cohort impact the aggregation and co-aggregation in siblings of DUD and alcohol use disorder (AUD).

Methods: We examined risk for DUD and AUD in siblings of 102,624 DUD cases and matched control probands and 123,837 AUD case and matched control probands identified using Swedish registries. Flexible parametric survival models assessed the difference in disorder risk in siblings of case versus control probands.

Results: Over birthyears 1950-1990, rates of DUD increased substantially in the Swedish population. In siblings of DUD cases versus controls, the risk for DUD increased dramatically starting in birthyear 1965 while their risk for AUD fell moderately. A similar, but less pronounced pattern, was seen in the siblings of AUD versus control probands. These differences were much larger in male than in female siblings.

Conclusions: The factors that drove upward population rates of DUD in Sweden (e.g. increased availability, reduced stigma) produced much stronger effects in high-risk subjects (siblings of DUD and AUD probands) than in normal risk groups (siblings of controls), thereby increasing familial aggregation of DUD. However, parallel declines in AUD rates in high-risk versus normal-risk siblings were observed, likely due to 'competitive effects' reducing coaggregation of DUD and AUD. Results of genetic studies of substance use disorders can be substantially impacted by changes in availability and stigma of psychoactive substance use and indirectly by 'competition' as predicted by behavioral economic models, between abusable substances.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1950-1990年出生的受影响个体的兄弟姐妹中药物使用障碍和酒精使用障碍的家族聚集和共同聚集:一个暴露于药物使用障碍率上升的出生队列。
背景:我们试图阐明瑞典1950-1990年出生队列中药物使用障碍(DUD)患病率的变化如何影响DUD和酒精使用障碍(AUD)兄弟姐妹的聚集和共聚集。方法:我们检查了102,624例DUD病例和匹配的对照先证者以及123,837例AUD病例和匹配的对照先证者的兄弟姐妹中DUD和AUD的风险。灵活的参数生存模型评估病例与对照先证者兄弟姐妹的障碍风险差异。结果:在1950-1990年出生期间,瑞典人口中DUD的发生率显著增加。在DUD病例的兄弟姐妹中,与对照组相比,从1965年出生开始,DUD的风险急剧增加,而AUD的风险略有下降。与对照组先证者相比,在AUD的兄弟姐妹中也出现了类似但不太明显的模式。这些差异在男性兄弟姐妹中比在女性兄弟姐妹中要大得多。结论:在瑞典,导致DUD人群发病率上升的因素(如可获得性增加、污名化减少)在高风险受试者(DUD的兄弟姐妹和AUD先证)中比在正常风险人群(对照组的兄弟姐妹)中产生更强的影响,从而增加了DUD的家族聚集性。然而,与正常风险兄弟姐妹相比,观察到高风险兄弟姐妹的AUD率平行下降,可能是由于“竞争效应”减少了DUD和AUD的共同聚集。物质使用障碍的遗传研究结果可能受到精神活性物质使用的可得性和污名化变化的重大影响,也可能间接受到可滥用物质之间的“竞争”的影响,正如行为经济模型所预测的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
期刊最新文献
Letter about '"Here today, gone tomorrow" - What happened to recurrent brief depression?" Meta-analysis of neural correlates of working memory, reward, and emotion processing in major depressive disorder using ALE. The effect of adult psychological therapies on employment and earnings: Evidence from England. Evidence for a diagnostic distinction between functional seizures and functional motor symptoms from the TriNetX electronic health record database. Maternal depression with and without a history of childhood maltreatment and newborn white matter microstructure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1