Proactive symptom monitoring to initiate timely palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09311-1
Grace Meijuan Yang, Yu Ke, Xin Hui Ng, Patricia Soek Hui Neo, Yin Bun Cheung
{"title":"Proactive symptom monitoring to initiate timely palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Grace Meijuan Yang, Yu Ke, Xin Hui Ng, Patricia Soek Hui Neo, Yin Bun Cheung","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09311-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To deliver timely palliative care in response to supportive and palliative care needs as they arise, we developed a model called \"Supportive and Palliative care Review Kit in Locations Everywhere\" (SPARKLE), which comprises regular remote symptom monitoring using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS); early identification and prompt treatment of palliative care symptoms and concerns identified; and referral to specialist palliative care if follow-up is required.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized controlled trial of SPARKLE versus usual care was conducted among patients with advanced cancers. The primary endpoint was Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scores at 16 weeks post randomization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 239 patients were randomized-119 patients to usual care and 120 patients to SPARKLE intervention. There was no significant difference in total FACT-G score (baseline-adjusted difference 0.8, 95% CI - 3.5 to 5.1, p = 0.73). Physical well-being was better in the SPARKLE intervention group compared to the usual care group (baseline-adjusted difference 1.9, 95%CI 0.4 to 3.4, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the other domain scores. There were no differences in palliative care referrals, occurrence of emergency department visits, or hospital admissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there was no significant difference in overall quality of life, better physical symptom control could have been achieved through proactive identification and treatment of symptoms and concerns by the SPARKLE nurse. Further studies are warranted to evaluate how various components of palliative care service models impact clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04242251. Date of registration: 23 January 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 3","pages":"249"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09311-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To deliver timely palliative care in response to supportive and palliative care needs as they arise, we developed a model called "Supportive and Palliative care Review Kit in Locations Everywhere" (SPARKLE), which comprises regular remote symptom monitoring using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS); early identification and prompt treatment of palliative care symptoms and concerns identified; and referral to specialist palliative care if follow-up is required.

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial of SPARKLE versus usual care was conducted among patients with advanced cancers. The primary endpoint was Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scores at 16 weeks post randomization.

Results: A total of 239 patients were randomized-119 patients to usual care and 120 patients to SPARKLE intervention. There was no significant difference in total FACT-G score (baseline-adjusted difference 0.8, 95% CI - 3.5 to 5.1, p = 0.73). Physical well-being was better in the SPARKLE intervention group compared to the usual care group (baseline-adjusted difference 1.9, 95%CI 0.4 to 3.4, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the other domain scores. There were no differences in palliative care referrals, occurrence of emergency department visits, or hospital admissions.

Conclusion: Although there was no significant difference in overall quality of life, better physical symptom control could have been achieved through proactive identification and treatment of symptoms and concerns by the SPARKLE nurse. Further studies are warranted to evaluate how various components of palliative care service models impact clinical outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04242251. Date of registration: 23 January 2020.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动症状监测以启动晚期癌症患者的及时姑息治疗:一项随机对照试验。
目的:为了及时提供姑息治疗,以应对支持和姑息治疗需求的出现,我们开发了一个名为“各地支持和姑息治疗审查工具包”(SPARKLE)的模型,其中包括使用综合姑息治疗结果量表(IPOS)定期远程监测症状;早期发现和及时治疗已确定的缓和治疗症状和关切;如果需要随访,转诊到专科姑息治疗。方法:在晚期癌症患者中进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验。主要终点是随机分组后16周的功能性癌症治疗评估(FACT-G)评分。结果:239例患者被随机分组,119例患者接受常规治疗,120例患者接受SPARKLE干预。总FACT-G评分无显著差异(基线校正差为0.8,95% CI - 3.5 ~ 5.1, p = 0.73)。与常规护理组相比,SPARKLE干预组的身体健康状况更好(基线校正差异为1.9,95%CI为0.4 ~ 3.4,p = 0.01)。其他领域的得分差异无统计学意义。在姑息治疗转诊、急诊科就诊或住院方面没有差异。结论:虽然两组患者的整体生活质量没有显著差异,但通过SPARKLE护士对症状和关注点的积极识别和治疗,可以实现更好的身体症状控制。需要进一步的研究来评估姑息治疗服务模式的各个组成部分如何影响临床结果。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04242251。注册日期:2020年1月23日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Barriers and enablers to integrating physical activity in breast cancer care: A qualitative study using the TDF and COM-B model. Mean differences or standardized mean differences in network meta-analyses. Pulling teeth: access to dental clearance in patients with cancer eligible for bone-modifying agents. A pragmatic evaluation of community-based lymphoedema services for individuals at risk of, or living with, cancer-related lymphoedema. Prevalence of concurrent severe self-reported late symptoms and functional limitations in cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study of sociodemographic, clinical, and lifestyle associations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1