[Requirements and possible solutions for practice-relevant nursing research in acute care in Germany: Results of a scoping workshop].

Martin Müller, Sascha Köpke, Gabriele Meyer
{"title":"[Requirements and possible solutions for practice-relevant nursing research in acute care in Germany: Results of a scoping workshop].","authors":"Martin Müller, Sascha Köpke, Gabriele Meyer","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nursing science as an academic discipline in Germany is still developing and has not yet been sufficiently integrated into acute hospital care. The aim of this paper is to analyze the key challenges of nursing research in acute hospital care and to develop strategic solutions to strengthen the development of nursing science in Germany. The results of a two-day scoping workshop with national and international experts indicate that the lack of structural integration of nursing science into clinical care, the low number of academically qualified nursing professionals, and insufficient research funding are major obstacles to further development. Based on a SWOT analysis, six priority action areas were identified: (1) development and implementation of qualification and career programs, (2) promotion of clinician scientists, (3) strengthening visibility and communication, (4) effective political participation, (5) increase of research funding, and (6) improvement of networks and collaborations. The implementation of these strategies will contribute to establishing nursing science as an independent discipline, increasing its societal relevance, and promoting evidence-based nursing practice in inpatient acute care. Close collaboration among academia, policymakers, and practitioners is essential for achieving these goal.</p>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nursing science as an academic discipline in Germany is still developing and has not yet been sufficiently integrated into acute hospital care. The aim of this paper is to analyze the key challenges of nursing research in acute hospital care and to develop strategic solutions to strengthen the development of nursing science in Germany. The results of a two-day scoping workshop with national and international experts indicate that the lack of structural integration of nursing science into clinical care, the low number of academically qualified nursing professionals, and insufficient research funding are major obstacles to further development. Based on a SWOT analysis, six priority action areas were identified: (1) development and implementation of qualification and career programs, (2) promotion of clinician scientists, (3) strengthening visibility and communication, (4) effective political participation, (5) increase of research funding, and (6) improvement of networks and collaborations. The implementation of these strategies will contribute to establishing nursing science as an independent discipline, increasing its societal relevance, and promoting evidence-based nursing practice in inpatient acute care. Close collaboration among academia, policymakers, and practitioners is essential for achieving these goal.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
[How can we support medical residents and lateral entrants into general practice during the transition from the inpatient to the outpatient setting? A qualitative interview study]. The aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic in general practices compared to pre-pandemic times: Longitudinal questionnaire survey among general practitioners and medical practice assistants in Germany on how the pandemic shaped everyday care. [Real-world data for comparative effectiveness research: Taking stock of available data sources in Germany with special regard to registries]. [Requirements and possible solutions for practice-relevant nursing research in acute care in Germany: Results of a scoping workshop]. [The importance of the right to opt for specialized vocational qualifications in general nursing training from the perspectives of vocational trainers and trainees - Results of an accompanying mixed methods research study].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1