Voraussetzungen und Lösungsansätze für eine praxisrelevante Pflegeforschung in der Akutversorgung in Deutschland: Ergebnisse eines Scoping-Workshops

IF 1.7 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.004
Martin Müller , Sascha Köpke , Gabriele Meyer
{"title":"Voraussetzungen und Lösungsansätze für eine praxisrelevante Pflegeforschung in der Akutversorgung in Deutschland: Ergebnisse eines Scoping-Workshops","authors":"Martin Müller ,&nbsp;Sascha Köpke ,&nbsp;Gabriele Meyer","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nursing science as an academic discipline in Germany is still developing and has not yet been sufficiently integrated into acute hospital care. The aim of this paper is to analyze the key challenges of nursing research in acute hospital care and to develop strategic solutions to strengthen the development of nursing science in Germany. The results of a two-day scoping workshop with national and international experts indicate that the lack of structural integration of nursing science into clinical care, the low number of academically qualified nursing professionals, and insufficient research funding are major obstacles to further development. Based on a SWOT analysis, six priority action areas were identified: (1) development and implementation of qualification and career programs, (2) promotion of clinician scientists, (3) strengthening visibility and communication, (4) effective political participation, (5) increase of research funding, and (6) improvement of networks and collaborations. The implementation of these strategies will contribute to establishing nursing science as an independent discipline, increasing its societal relevance, and promoting evidence-based nursing practice in inpatient acute care. Close collaboration among academia, policymakers, and practitioners is essential for achieving these goal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"193 ","pages":"Pages 104-111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921725000546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nursing science as an academic discipline in Germany is still developing and has not yet been sufficiently integrated into acute hospital care. The aim of this paper is to analyze the key challenges of nursing research in acute hospital care and to develop strategic solutions to strengthen the development of nursing science in Germany. The results of a two-day scoping workshop with national and international experts indicate that the lack of structural integration of nursing science into clinical care, the low number of academically qualified nursing professionals, and insufficient research funding are major obstacles to further development. Based on a SWOT analysis, six priority action areas were identified: (1) development and implementation of qualification and career programs, (2) promotion of clinician scientists, (3) strengthening visibility and communication, (4) effective political participation, (5) increase of research funding, and (6) improvement of networks and collaborations. The implementation of these strategies will contribute to establishing nursing science as an independent discipline, increasing its societal relevance, and promoting evidence-based nursing practice in inpatient acute care. Close collaboration among academia, policymakers, and practitioners is essential for achieving these goal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[德国急症护理实践相关护理研究的要求和可能的解决方案:范围界定研讨会的结果]。
护理科学作为一门学术学科在德国仍处于发展阶段,尚未充分融入急性医院护理。本文的目的是分析急诊护理研究面临的主要挑战,并制定战略解决方案,以加强德国护理科学的发展。由国内和国际专家参加的为期两天的范围界定研讨会的结果表明,护理科学缺乏与临床护理的结构性整合,学术上合格的护理专业人员数量少,研究经费不足是进一步发展的主要障碍。基于SWOT分析,确定了六个优先行动领域:(1)制定和实施资格和职业计划,(2)促进临床科学家,(3)加强知名度和沟通,(4)有效的政治参与,(5)增加研究经费,(6)改善网络和合作。这些策略的实施将有助于建立护理科学作为一门独立的学科,增加其社会相关性,并促进住院急症护理的循证护理实践。学术界、政策制定者和实践者之间的密切合作对于实现这些目标至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
Experiences of occupational and physical therapists in Germany as recipients of knowledge transfer: A qualitative telephone interview study. [Delphi survey on barriers, concerns and feasibility options for data-based healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities (PWD) in Germany]. [Outpatients' needs for social service counselling - An exploratory survey in selected university outpatient clinics]. [Guideline recommendations and everyday medical practice from the physician perspective: Survey among physicians on the use of opioid analgesics in the long-term treatment for chronic non-cancer pain]. [A new approach to health care evaluation: Assessing the PopGrouper for matching and morbidity measurement using the disease management programs for CHD and breast cancer].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1