The Intersectional Influence of Experienced Stigma on Clinically Significant Depressive Symptoms Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men.
Benjamin W Barrett, Alison G Abraham, M Reuel Friedman, Janet M Turan, Matthew J Mimiaga, Valentina Stosor, Pamela J Surkan
{"title":"The Intersectional Influence of Experienced Stigma on Clinically Significant Depressive Symptoms Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men.","authors":"Benjamin W Barrett, Alison G Abraham, M Reuel Friedman, Janet M Turan, Matthew J Mimiaga, Valentina Stosor, Pamela J Surkan","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2475026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We sought to determine how intersectional stigma, operationalized by interactions of perceived stigma experiences in adulthood attributed to various social identities/characteristics (age, gender, race, ethnicity/nationality, religion, height/weight, other aspect of appearance [unrelated to the identities/characteristics listed-e.g. height/weight/race/gender], physical disability, sexual orientation, and HIV status), associates with clinically significant depressive symptoms (DS). We used data from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (Baltimore/Washington, DC; Chicago; Pittsburgh/Columbus; and Los Angeles) on 1,385 sexual minority men (SMM), collected April 1, 2008-March 31, 2009. Classification trees predicted DS. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified stigmas that tended to co-occur. We calculated and decomposed the joint disparity in DS risk between stigmas comprising each EFA factor. Thirty-four percent of men were classified with DS. Stigma was most commonly attributed to sexual orientation. Participants with stigma attributed to multiple social identities/characteristics had an increased risk of DS. In classification trees, covariates (especially income) were stronger predictors of DS than stigmas. Intersectional effects were observed between appearance and physical disability stigma (positive effect), and between race and ethnicity/nationality stigma, and sexual orientation and HIV status stigma (negative effects). Interventions to reduce stigmas among SMM, as well as improve the socioeconomic position of SMM in general, are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2475026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We sought to determine how intersectional stigma, operationalized by interactions of perceived stigma experiences in adulthood attributed to various social identities/characteristics (age, gender, race, ethnicity/nationality, religion, height/weight, other aspect of appearance [unrelated to the identities/characteristics listed-e.g. height/weight/race/gender], physical disability, sexual orientation, and HIV status), associates with clinically significant depressive symptoms (DS). We used data from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (Baltimore/Washington, DC; Chicago; Pittsburgh/Columbus; and Los Angeles) on 1,385 sexual minority men (SMM), collected April 1, 2008-March 31, 2009. Classification trees predicted DS. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified stigmas that tended to co-occur. We calculated and decomposed the joint disparity in DS risk between stigmas comprising each EFA factor. Thirty-four percent of men were classified with DS. Stigma was most commonly attributed to sexual orientation. Participants with stigma attributed to multiple social identities/characteristics had an increased risk of DS. In classification trees, covariates (especially income) were stronger predictors of DS than stigmas. Intersectional effects were observed between appearance and physical disability stigma (positive effect), and between race and ethnicity/nationality stigma, and sexual orientation and HIV status stigma (negative effects). Interventions to reduce stigmas among SMM, as well as improve the socioeconomic position of SMM in general, are needed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.