Weighted Answer Similarity Analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL Applied Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1177/01466216251322353
Nicholas Trout, Kylie Gorney
{"title":"Weighted Answer Similarity Analysis.","authors":"Nicholas Trout, Kylie Gorney","doi":"10.1177/01466216251322353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Romero et al. (2015; see also Wollack, 1997) developed the <i>ω</i> statistic as a method for detecting unusually similar answers between pairs of examinees. For each pair, the <i>ω</i> statistic considers whether the observed number of similar answers is significantly larger than the expected number of similar answers. However, one limitation of <i>ω</i> is that it does not account for the particular items on which similar answers are observed. Therefore, in this study, we propose a weighted version of the <i>ω</i> statistic that takes this information into account. We compare the performance of the new and existing statistics using detailed simulations in which several factors are manipulated. Results show that while both the new and existing statistics are able to control the Type I error rate, the new statistic is more powerful, on average.</p>","PeriodicalId":48300,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychological Measurement","volume":" ","pages":"01466216251322353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216251322353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Romero et al. (2015; see also Wollack, 1997) developed the ω statistic as a method for detecting unusually similar answers between pairs of examinees. For each pair, the ω statistic considers whether the observed number of similar answers is significantly larger than the expected number of similar answers. However, one limitation of ω is that it does not account for the particular items on which similar answers are observed. Therefore, in this study, we propose a weighted version of the ω statistic that takes this information into account. We compare the performance of the new and existing statistics using detailed simulations in which several factors are manipulated. Results show that while both the new and existing statistics are able to control the Type I error rate, the new statistic is more powerful, on average.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加权答案相似度分析。
Romero et al. (2015;另见Wollack, 1997)发展了ω统计作为一种方法来检测异常相似的答案对考生之间。对于每一对,ω统计量考虑观察到的相似答案的数量是否显著大于预期的相似答案的数量。然而,ω的一个限制是,它没有考虑到观察到类似答案的特定项目。因此,在本研究中,我们提出了一个考虑到这些信息的ω统计量的加权版本。我们使用几个因素被操纵的详细模拟来比较新的和现有的统计数据的性能。结果表明,虽然新的和现有的统计量都能够控制第一类错误率,但平均而言,新的统计量更强大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Applied Psychological Measurement publishes empirical research on the application of techniques of psychological measurement to substantive problems in all areas of psychology and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Rise of the Machine: Detecting Aberrant Response Patterns in Survey Instruments Using Autoencoder. The Impact of Latent Density Misspecification on Item Response Theory Equating Methods. Score-Based Tests With Fixed Effects Person Parameters in Item Response Theory: Detecting Model Misspecification Including Differential Item Functioning. Optimal Item Calibration in the Context of the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test. Influence of Uninformative Prior Distributions for MCMC Method on Estimating Variance Components in Generalizability Theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1