Effects of dyadic psychoeducational interventions for haemodialysis patients and their family caregivers: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02835-1
Liyuan Zhang, Yan Chen, Wen Tang, Qian Wang, Li Zou, Lijuan Zhou
{"title":"Effects of dyadic psychoeducational interventions for haemodialysis patients and their family caregivers: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Liyuan Zhang, Yan Chen, Wen Tang, Qian Wang, Li Zou, Lijuan Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02835-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Haemodialysis may affect the changes in the patient's relationship with the family, and eventually cause some psychological distress to the patient and affect the health-related quality of life. This study examines the effectiveness of the dyadic psychoeducational intervention on patients' quality of life and psychosocial health, as well as caregiver burden and psychosocial outcomes among caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a parallel, two-arm, assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial with a repeated-measures design. A total of 80 haemodialysis dyads (patient and family caregivers) randomly assigned to the intervention group or control group with usual care (N = 40 dyads per group). The intervention included 4-week dyadic psychoeducational intervention. At before intervention (T<sub>0</sub>), immediately after intervention (T<sub>1</sub>), 1 month after intervention (T<sub>2</sub>) and 3 months after intervention (T<sub>3</sub>), patients' quality of life ana caregiver burden (primary outcomes), and other secondary outcomes (i.e., dyads' coping, depression and anxiety symptoms, and social support) were evaluated. Generalized Estimated Equation was used to test the intervention effect of the dyadic psychoeducation intervention, and intentional-to-treat analysis was used for all analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effects of dyadic psychoeducational intervention: The result of adjusting the GEE model shows that dyadic psychoeducational intervention can effectively improve patients' quality of life (T<sub>1</sub>: β = 8.51, p < 0.001; T<sub>2</sub>: β = 9.03, p < 0.001; T<sub>3</sub>: β = 8.82, p < 0.001), patients' anxiety (T<sub>1</sub>: β = -2.35, p = 0.022; T<sub>2</sub>: β = -2.84, p = 0.002; T<sub>3</sub>: β = -2.85, p = 0.001) and caregivers' anxiety (T<sub>2</sub>: β = -1.67, p = 0.012; T<sub>3</sub>: β = -2.57, p = 0.004), patients' depression (T<sub>2</sub>: β = -2.39, p = 0.017; T<sub>3</sub>: β = -2.71, p = 0.006), caregiver burden (T<sub>2</sub>: β = -6.95, p = 0.007; T<sub>3</sub>: β = -6.34, p = 0.008), caregiver depression (T<sub>2</sub>: β = -2.01, p = 0.015; T<sub>3</sub>: β = -1.85, p = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dyadic psychoeducational intervention can improve the psychosocial outcomes of haemodialysis dyads. This intervention provides effective ways and measures for the relevant psychological education intervention and provides new ideas and evidence for clinical nursing research.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was retrospectively registered as a randomized controlled trial in the ClinicalTrials Registry. Registration Date: April 16, 2024.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>NCT06203730.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"244"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02835-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Haemodialysis may affect the changes in the patient's relationship with the family, and eventually cause some psychological distress to the patient and affect the health-related quality of life. This study examines the effectiveness of the dyadic psychoeducational intervention on patients' quality of life and psychosocial health, as well as caregiver burden and psychosocial outcomes among caregivers.

Methods: This is a parallel, two-arm, assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial with a repeated-measures design. A total of 80 haemodialysis dyads (patient and family caregivers) randomly assigned to the intervention group or control group with usual care (N = 40 dyads per group). The intervention included 4-week dyadic psychoeducational intervention. At before intervention (T0), immediately after intervention (T1), 1 month after intervention (T2) and 3 months after intervention (T3), patients' quality of life ana caregiver burden (primary outcomes), and other secondary outcomes (i.e., dyads' coping, depression and anxiety symptoms, and social support) were evaluated. Generalized Estimated Equation was used to test the intervention effect of the dyadic psychoeducation intervention, and intentional-to-treat analysis was used for all analyses.

Results: Effects of dyadic psychoeducational intervention: The result of adjusting the GEE model shows that dyadic psychoeducational intervention can effectively improve patients' quality of life (T1: β = 8.51, p < 0.001; T2: β = 9.03, p < 0.001; T3: β = 8.82, p < 0.001), patients' anxiety (T1: β = -2.35, p = 0.022; T2: β = -2.84, p = 0.002; T3: β = -2.85, p = 0.001) and caregivers' anxiety (T2: β = -1.67, p = 0.012; T3: β = -2.57, p = 0.004), patients' depression (T2: β = -2.39, p = 0.017; T3: β = -2.71, p = 0.006), caregiver burden (T2: β = -6.95, p = 0.007; T3: β = -6.34, p = 0.008), caregiver depression (T2: β = -2.01, p = 0.015; T3: β = -1.85, p = 0.015).

Conclusions: The dyadic psychoeducational intervention can improve the psychosocial outcomes of haemodialysis dyads. This intervention provides effective ways and measures for the relevant psychological education intervention and provides new ideas and evidence for clinical nursing research.

Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered as a randomized controlled trial in the ClinicalTrials Registry. Registration Date: April 16, 2024.

Registration number: NCT06203730.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Assessing delirium knowledge among health care professionals: findings from a scoping review. Leading evidence-based practice: nurse managers' strategies for knowledge utilisation in acute care settings. Resilience as a moderator of the effects of types of workplace bullying and job performance. The mediating role of emotional intelligence in the relationship between technostress and burnout prevention among critical care nurses a structural equation modelling approach. The relationship between smartphone addiction and sleep quality in older adults: the mediating role of loneliness and depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1