Effects of dyadic psychoeducational interventions for haemodialysis patients and their family caregivers: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02835-1
Liyuan Zhang, Yan Chen, Wen Tang, Qian Wang, Li Zou, Lijuan Zhou
{"title":"Effects of dyadic psychoeducational interventions for haemodialysis patients and their family caregivers: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Liyuan Zhang, Yan Chen, Wen Tang, Qian Wang, Li Zou, Lijuan Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02835-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Haemodialysis may affect the changes in the patient's relationship with the family, and eventually cause some psychological distress to the patient and affect the health-related quality of life. This study examines the effectiveness of the dyadic psychoeducational intervention on patients' quality of life and psychosocial health, as well as caregiver burden and psychosocial outcomes among caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a parallel, two-arm, assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial with a repeated-measures design. A total of 80 haemodialysis dyads (patient and family caregivers) randomly assigned to the intervention group or control group with usual care (N = 40 dyads per group). The intervention included 4-week dyadic psychoeducational intervention. At before intervention (T<sub>0</sub>), immediately after intervention (T<sub>1</sub>), 1 month after intervention (T<sub>2</sub>) and 3 months after intervention (T<sub>3</sub>), patients' quality of life ana caregiver burden (primary outcomes), and other secondary outcomes (i.e., dyads' coping, depression and anxiety symptoms, and social support) were evaluated. Generalized Estimated Equation was used to test the intervention effect of the dyadic psychoeducation intervention, and intentional-to-treat analysis was used for all analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effects of dyadic psychoeducational intervention: The result of adjusting the GEE model shows that dyadic psychoeducational intervention can effectively improve patients' quality of life (T<sub>1</sub>: β = 8.51, p < 0.001; T<sub>2</sub>: β = 9.03, p < 0.001; T<sub>3</sub>: β = 8.82, p < 0.001), patients' anxiety (T<sub>1</sub>: β = -2.35, p = 0.022; T<sub>2</sub>: β = -2.84, p = 0.002; T<sub>3</sub>: β = -2.85, p = 0.001) and caregivers' anxiety (T<sub>2</sub>: β = -1.67, p = 0.012; T<sub>3</sub>: β = -2.57, p = 0.004), patients' depression (T<sub>2</sub>: β = -2.39, p = 0.017; T<sub>3</sub>: β = -2.71, p = 0.006), caregiver burden (T<sub>2</sub>: β = -6.95, p = 0.007; T<sub>3</sub>: β = -6.34, p = 0.008), caregiver depression (T<sub>2</sub>: β = -2.01, p = 0.015; T<sub>3</sub>: β = -1.85, p = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dyadic psychoeducational intervention can improve the psychosocial outcomes of haemodialysis dyads. This intervention provides effective ways and measures for the relevant psychological education intervention and provides new ideas and evidence for clinical nursing research.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was retrospectively registered as a randomized controlled trial in the ClinicalTrials Registry. Registration Date: April 16, 2024.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>NCT06203730.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"244"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02835-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Haemodialysis may affect the changes in the patient's relationship with the family, and eventually cause some psychological distress to the patient and affect the health-related quality of life. This study examines the effectiveness of the dyadic psychoeducational intervention on patients' quality of life and psychosocial health, as well as caregiver burden and psychosocial outcomes among caregivers.

Methods: This is a parallel, two-arm, assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial with a repeated-measures design. A total of 80 haemodialysis dyads (patient and family caregivers) randomly assigned to the intervention group or control group with usual care (N = 40 dyads per group). The intervention included 4-week dyadic psychoeducational intervention. At before intervention (T0), immediately after intervention (T1), 1 month after intervention (T2) and 3 months after intervention (T3), patients' quality of life ana caregiver burden (primary outcomes), and other secondary outcomes (i.e., dyads' coping, depression and anxiety symptoms, and social support) were evaluated. Generalized Estimated Equation was used to test the intervention effect of the dyadic psychoeducation intervention, and intentional-to-treat analysis was used for all analyses.

Results: Effects of dyadic psychoeducational intervention: The result of adjusting the GEE model shows that dyadic psychoeducational intervention can effectively improve patients' quality of life (T1: β = 8.51, p < 0.001; T2: β = 9.03, p < 0.001; T3: β = 8.82, p < 0.001), patients' anxiety (T1: β = -2.35, p = 0.022; T2: β = -2.84, p = 0.002; T3: β = -2.85, p = 0.001) and caregivers' anxiety (T2: β = -1.67, p = 0.012; T3: β = -2.57, p = 0.004), patients' depression (T2: β = -2.39, p = 0.017; T3: β = -2.71, p = 0.006), caregiver burden (T2: β = -6.95, p = 0.007; T3: β = -6.34, p = 0.008), caregiver depression (T2: β = -2.01, p = 0.015; T3: β = -1.85, p = 0.015).

Conclusions: The dyadic psychoeducational intervention can improve the psychosocial outcomes of haemodialysis dyads. This intervention provides effective ways and measures for the relevant psychological education intervention and provides new ideas and evidence for clinical nursing research.

Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered as a randomized controlled trial in the ClinicalTrials Registry. Registration Date: April 16, 2024.

Registration number: NCT06203730.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双重心理教育干预对血液透析患者及其家庭照顾者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:血液透析可能影响患者与家庭关系的改变,最终给患者造成一定的心理困扰,影响与健康相关的生活质量。本研究探讨了双重心理教育干预对患者生活质量和心理社会健康的有效性,以及照顾者负担和照顾者的心理社会结局。方法:这是一项平行、双组、评估盲、随机对照试验,采用重复测量设计。80例血液透析患者(患者及家属)随机分为干预组和常规护理对照组(每组40例)。干预包括为期4周的双重心理教育干预。分别在干预前(T0)、干预后(T1)、干预后1个月(T2)和干预后3个月(T3)评估患者的生活质量和照顾者负担(主要结局)以及其他次要结局(即夫妻应对、抑郁和焦虑症状、社会支持)。采用广义估计方程检验二元心理教育干预的干预效果,所有分析均采用意向治疗分析。结果:双重心理教育干预的效果:调整GEE模型结果表明,双重心理教育干预能有效改善患者的生活质量(T1: β = 8.51, p2: β = 9.03, p3: β = 8.82, p1: β = -2.35, p = 0.022;T2 β = -2.84, p = 0.002;T3:β= -2.85,p = 0.001)和护理人员的焦虑(T2:β= -1.67,p = 0.012;T3:β= -2.57,p = 0.004),病人的抑郁(T2:β= -2.39,p = 0.017;T3:β= -2.71,p = 0.006),照顾者负担(T2:β= -6.95,p = 0.007;T3:β= -6.34,p = 0.008),照顾者抑郁(T2:β= -2.01,p = 0.015;T3: β = -1.85, p = 0.015)。结论:双元心理教育干预可改善血液透析双元患者的社会心理结局。该干预为相关心理教育干预提供了有效的途径和措施,为临床护理研究提供了新的思路和依据。试验注册:本研究作为随机对照试验在临床试验注册中心回顾性注册。报名日期:2024年4月16日。注册号:NCT06203730。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
The Haunting Echoes of Omitted Care: intensive care unit nurses' experiences of missed nursing care, a phenomenological study. Development and psychometric evaluation of a scale assessing nursing students' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding evidence-based care bundles. Emotional exhaustion as a key factor: examining the impact of perceived organizational support on nurses' trust in colleagues. Factors influencing insomnia among nurses in Wuhan, China, two years after the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional study. The mediating effect of positive self-belief on the relationship between work stress and humanistic nursing competence among Chinese nurses: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1