HIV retesting uptake and incidence during pregnancy and breastfeeding period among women in sub-Saharan Africa.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Promotion International Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1093/heapro/daaf008
Zuhura Mbwana Ally, Jackline Vicent Mbishi, Mariam Salim Mbwana, Hafidha Mhando Bakari, Swalehe Mustafa Salim, Joseph Obure, Zarin Nudar Rodoshi, Saw Paul Wai Htoo, Adrian Koola, Biruk Demisse Ayalew, Rebecca Mesfin Sileshi, Muhidin Ibrahim Hundisa, Haji Mbwana Ally, Hassan Fredrick Fussi, Lynn Moshi, Taylor Lascko, Habib Omari Ramadhani
{"title":"HIV retesting uptake and incidence during pregnancy and breastfeeding period among women in sub-Saharan Africa.","authors":"Zuhura Mbwana Ally, Jackline Vicent Mbishi, Mariam Salim Mbwana, Hafidha Mhando Bakari, Swalehe Mustafa Salim, Joseph Obure, Zarin Nudar Rodoshi, Saw Paul Wai Htoo, Adrian Koola, Biruk Demisse Ayalew, Rebecca Mesfin Sileshi, Muhidin Ibrahim Hundisa, Haji Mbwana Ally, Hassan Fredrick Fussi, Lynn Moshi, Taylor Lascko, Habib Omari Ramadhani","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To prevent and reduce mother-to-child transmission of HIV and maternal morbidity and mortality, the World Health Organization currently requires retesting for HIV during pregnancy and postpartum. This was a systematic review and meta-analysis in which PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for articles published between January 2005 and February 2024. Retesting uptake was defined as the number of women who tested for HIV during pregnancy/breastfeeding periods following an initial HIV-negative test during these periods. Using random-effects models, we computed the pooled prevalence of HIV retesting uptake, incidence rates (IRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A sensitivity analysis was done by excluding studies that tested women during labor and reported 100% retesting uptake. A total of 37 studies with 1,999,621 women were analyzed. Overall, the pooled prevalence of HIV retesting uptake was 89.1% (95%CI, 81.0-95.2). Retesting uptake was significantly higher during breastfeeding compared to pregnancy (93.3% vs. 89.9%; P < 0.001). A sensitivity analysis showed that overall retesting uptake was 73.9% (95%CI, 60.1-83.8). A total of 1302 (0.2%) women acquired HIV. Twenty-two studies reported an IR; the overall pooled IR was 4.3/100 person-year (PY; 95%CI, 3.4-5.2/100 PY). The HIV incidence rate was significantly higher during pregnancy compared to breastfeeding (5.9/100 vs. 3.4/100 PY; P < 0.001). One to three in 10 women in sub-Saharan Africa do not retest for HIV following a negative test during pregnancy or breastfeeding periods. Emphasizing HIV retesting during these periods is critical to eliminate pediatric HIV given that the overall IR is beyond the WHO threshold (3.0/100 PY) for a substantial risk of HIV transmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To prevent and reduce mother-to-child transmission of HIV and maternal morbidity and mortality, the World Health Organization currently requires retesting for HIV during pregnancy and postpartum. This was a systematic review and meta-analysis in which PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for articles published between January 2005 and February 2024. Retesting uptake was defined as the number of women who tested for HIV during pregnancy/breastfeeding periods following an initial HIV-negative test during these periods. Using random-effects models, we computed the pooled prevalence of HIV retesting uptake, incidence rates (IRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A sensitivity analysis was done by excluding studies that tested women during labor and reported 100% retesting uptake. A total of 37 studies with 1,999,621 women were analyzed. Overall, the pooled prevalence of HIV retesting uptake was 89.1% (95%CI, 81.0-95.2). Retesting uptake was significantly higher during breastfeeding compared to pregnancy (93.3% vs. 89.9%; P < 0.001). A sensitivity analysis showed that overall retesting uptake was 73.9% (95%CI, 60.1-83.8). A total of 1302 (0.2%) women acquired HIV. Twenty-two studies reported an IR; the overall pooled IR was 4.3/100 person-year (PY; 95%CI, 3.4-5.2/100 PY). The HIV incidence rate was significantly higher during pregnancy compared to breastfeeding (5.9/100 vs. 3.4/100 PY; P < 0.001). One to three in 10 women in sub-Saharan Africa do not retest for HIV following a negative test during pregnancy or breastfeeding periods. Emphasizing HIV retesting during these periods is critical to eliminate pediatric HIV given that the overall IR is beyond the WHO threshold (3.0/100 PY) for a substantial risk of HIV transmission.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
撒哈拉以南非洲妇女怀孕和哺乳期间艾滋病毒重新检测的接受情况和发病率。
为了预防和减少艾滋病毒母婴传播以及孕产妇发病率和死亡率,世界卫生组织目前要求在怀孕期间和产后重新进行艾滋病毒检测。这是一项系统综述和荟萃分析,检索了PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase和clinicaltrials.gov在2005年1月至2024年2月间发表的文章。重新检测吸收的定义是在怀孕/哺乳期间进行初次艾滋病毒阴性检测后进行艾滋病毒检测的妇女人数。使用随机效应模型,我们计算了HIV重新检测的总流行率、发病率(IRs)和95%置信区间(ci)。敏感度分析排除了在分娩期间对妇女进行检测并报告100%重新检测的研究。共有37项研究分析了1,999,621名女性。总体而言,HIV重新检测的总流行率为89.1% (95%CI, 81.0-95.2)。与怀孕期间相比,母乳喂养期间的重新检测摄取明显更高(93.3% vs 89.9%;P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
期刊最新文献
An umbrella review of barriers, facilitators, and interventions for children and youth with disabilities. Promoting self-determined Indigenous data governance in Canada: the Métis Health Research and Data Governance Principles. Trust is a verb: how to reimagine confidence in health systems. The changing context of Health in All Policies in Finland since the 8th Global Conference on Health Promotion in Finland. Health-promoting housing policy in a changing climate: integrating affordability, security, and resilience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1