The role of general practitioners in the follow-up of positive results from the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program - a scoping review.

Jane Gaspar, Caroline Bulsara, Diane Arnold-Reed, Karen Taylor, Anne Williams
{"title":"The role of general practitioners in the follow-up of positive results from the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program - a scoping review.","authors":"Jane Gaspar, Caroline Bulsara, Diane Arnold-Reed, Karen Taylor, Anne Williams","doi":"10.1071/PY24090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background There are several studies investigating the effectiveness and participation rates of the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP), but there is limited literature pertaining to the role and processes that general practitioners (GPs) follow after a positive immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) result. The aim of this paper is to review evidence examining GP involvement in the follow-up of positive iFOBT results from the NBCSP and identify knowledge gaps. Methods A scoping review was undertaken involving the search of the Cochrane Library, Informit, PubMed and Scopus electronic databases. Inclusion criteria were the follow-up processes and practices by GPs subsequent to notification of a positive iFOBT from this program. Searches were limited to English and publication was from January 2006 to January 2024. A combination of keywords was used and adapted to each search engines' requirements: general practitioner AND bowel cancer AND screening AND Australia. Results Relevant sources of evidence were reviewed, and 24 records met inclusion criteria. Results are represented across three themes: (i) screening process and GP follow-up; (ii) follow-up rates and facilitation; and (iii) recommendations for improved follow-up. Conclusion This scoping review provides insight into the central role GPs play in the implementation of the NBCSP and highlights the lack of information regarding steps taken and systems employed in general practice to manage positive iFOBTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"31 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background There are several studies investigating the effectiveness and participation rates of the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP), but there is limited literature pertaining to the role and processes that general practitioners (GPs) follow after a positive immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) result. The aim of this paper is to review evidence examining GP involvement in the follow-up of positive iFOBT results from the NBCSP and identify knowledge gaps. Methods A scoping review was undertaken involving the search of the Cochrane Library, Informit, PubMed and Scopus electronic databases. Inclusion criteria were the follow-up processes and practices by GPs subsequent to notification of a positive iFOBT from this program. Searches were limited to English and publication was from January 2006 to January 2024. A combination of keywords was used and adapted to each search engines' requirements: general practitioner AND bowel cancer AND screening AND Australia. Results Relevant sources of evidence were reviewed, and 24 records met inclusion criteria. Results are represented across three themes: (i) screening process and GP follow-up; (ii) follow-up rates and facilitation; and (iii) recommendations for improved follow-up. Conclusion This scoping review provides insight into the central role GPs play in the implementation of the NBCSP and highlights the lack of information regarding steps taken and systems employed in general practice to manage positive iFOBTs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全科医生在澳大利亚国家肠癌筛查项目阳性结果随访中的作用-范围审查。
有几项研究调查了澳大利亚国家肠癌筛查计划(NBCSP)的有效性和参与率,但关于全科医生(gp)在免疫化学粪便隐血试验(iFOBT)结果阳性后的作用和过程的文献有限。本文的目的是回顾GP参与NBCSP阳性iFOBT结果随访的证据,并确定知识差距。方法检索Cochrane Library、Informit、PubMed和Scopus电子数据库进行范围综述。纳入标准是全科医生在该项目中iFOBT阳性通知后的随访过程和实践。检索仅限于英文,出版时间为2006年1月至2024年1月。根据每个搜索引擎的要求,使用并调整了关键词组合:全科医生、肠癌、筛查和澳大利亚。结果回顾了相关证据来源,有24例符合纳入标准。结果体现在三个主题上:(i)筛查过程和GP随访;后续费率和便利;(三)改进后续行动的建议。这一范围综述深入了解了全科医生在实施NBCSP中发挥的核心作用,并强调了在一般实践中管理阳性ifobt所采取的步骤和采用的系统方面缺乏信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
National and international guidelines for preconception care and comparison with Australian guidelines: a systematic review. Establishing oral care routines among people with mental health challenges: an analysis of a self-regulation intervention using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour model. The role of primary healthcare nurses in disasters due to natural hazards: a scoping review. Mapping the evidence for Multipurpose Health Services in rural Australia. A systematic-narrative review of goal-setting guidelines in workers' compensation rehabilitation in Australia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1