Dry needling for mechanical neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Surgical neurology international Pub Date : 2025-02-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.25259/SNI_797_2024
Abdulsalam M Aleid, Abdulmajeed Abdulaziz Aljabr, Saud Nayef Aldanyowi, Hasan Ali AlAidarous, Zainab Mohammed Aleid, Abdulaziz S Alharthi, Mutlaq Naheitan Alsubaie, Lama Ibrahim AlOraini, Abdulrahman Rashed Almoslem, Abbas Al Mutair
{"title":"Dry needling for mechanical neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Abdulsalam M Aleid, Abdulmajeed Abdulaziz Aljabr, Saud Nayef Aldanyowi, Hasan Ali AlAidarous, Zainab Mohammed Aleid, Abdulaziz S Alharthi, Mutlaq Naheitan Alsubaie, Lama Ibrahim AlOraini, Abdulrahman Rashed Almoslem, Abbas Al Mutair","doi":"10.25259/SNI_797_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dry needling (DN) has emerged as a potential treatment for mechanical neck pain, but the evidence remains inconclusive. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of DN in improving pain and functionality in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar, were searched from December 2013 to January 2024. Studies involving adult participants with chronic mechanical neck pain treated with DN were included in the study. The primary outcomes were pain pressure threshold (PPT), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and cervical range of motion. Statistical analysis used a random-effect model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine RCTs with a total of 540 participants were included in the study. DN significantly improved the PPT with an MD of 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.65; <i>P</i> < 0.001). NDI also showed a significant improvement, with an MD of -0.68 (95% CI, -1.32--0.05; <i>P</i> = 0.04). In terms of cervical range of motion, DN improved flexion (MD 4.07, 95% CI, 0.39-7.75; <i>P</i> = 0.03) and right rotation (MD 8.20, 95% CI, 3.05-13.35; <i>P</i> = 0.002), but no significant differences were observed in extension, left rotation, or lateral flexions (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DN appears effective in short-term pain relief and functional outcomes for patients with mechanical neck pain but shows limited impact on the cervical range of motion.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"16 ","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_797_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dry needling (DN) has emerged as a potential treatment for mechanical neck pain, but the evidence remains inconclusive. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of DN in improving pain and functionality in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar, were searched from December 2013 to January 2024. Studies involving adult participants with chronic mechanical neck pain treated with DN were included in the study. The primary outcomes were pain pressure threshold (PPT), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and cervical range of motion. Statistical analysis used a random-effect model.

Results: Nine RCTs with a total of 540 participants were included in the study. DN significantly improved the PPT with an MD of 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.65; P < 0.001). NDI also showed a significant improvement, with an MD of -0.68 (95% CI, -1.32--0.05; P = 0.04). In terms of cervical range of motion, DN improved flexion (MD 4.07, 95% CI, 0.39-7.75; P = 0.03) and right rotation (MD 8.20, 95% CI, 3.05-13.35; P = 0.002), but no significant differences were observed in extension, left rotation, or lateral flexions (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: DN appears effective in short-term pain relief and functional outcomes for patients with mechanical neck pain but shows limited impact on the cervical range of motion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma of the dura mimicking meningioma: A case report. Orbital tumors: A retrospective analysis of cases from Iraq and orbital anatomical perspectives. Pediatric third ventricular glioependymal cyst: A case report. Posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy with partial pediculotomy for management of highly down-migrated cervical disc herniation: A case report. Putaminal hemorrhage potentially attributable to over-drainage of cerebrospinal fluid following ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery in moyamoya disease: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1