Femoral to sciatic nerve transfer: A cadaver study.

Surgical neurology international Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.25259/SNI_60_2025
Melissa Trudrung, Ethan Mickelson, Pradeep Attaluri, Robert Edward George, Brian Gander, Amgad Hanna
{"title":"Femoral to sciatic nerve transfer: A cadaver study.","authors":"Melissa Trudrung, Ethan Mickelson, Pradeep Attaluri, Robert Edward George, Brian Gander, Amgad Hanna","doi":"10.25259/SNI_60_2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proximal sciatic nerve injuries are a challenge to treat due to the limited options for donor nerves and the long distance needed for regeneration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In our cadaveric study using five human cadavers, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of transferring the tibial and common peroneal components of the sciatic nerve to the femoral nerve motor branches of the vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis without the need for interposition nerve graft. The femoral nerve branches of the VM and lateralis were exposed anteriorly. The sciatic nerve was exposed posteriorly and passed through a narrow window within the adductor magnus and medial to the femur. The sciatic nerve was then separated into its tibial and peroneal components, which were then coapted to the VM and lateralis motor branches of the femoral nerve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the entire tibial and peroneal components of the sciatic nerve, we were able to gain more length and directly coapt the femoral nerve branches without utilizing interposition grafts. The disadvantage of this technique is suturing to a mixed nerve with motor and sensory components, which could compromise functional outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine how the procedure will impact a patient's gait cycle.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical application is needed to determine preliminary outcomes before widespread utilization of this technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"16 ","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_60_2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proximal sciatic nerve injuries are a challenge to treat due to the limited options for donor nerves and the long distance needed for regeneration.

Methods: In our cadaveric study using five human cadavers, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of transferring the tibial and common peroneal components of the sciatic nerve to the femoral nerve motor branches of the vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis without the need for interposition nerve graft. The femoral nerve branches of the VM and lateralis were exposed anteriorly. The sciatic nerve was exposed posteriorly and passed through a narrow window within the adductor magnus and medial to the femur. The sciatic nerve was then separated into its tibial and peroneal components, which were then coapted to the VM and lateralis motor branches of the femoral nerve.

Results: Using the entire tibial and peroneal components of the sciatic nerve, we were able to gain more length and directly coapt the femoral nerve branches without utilizing interposition grafts. The disadvantage of this technique is suturing to a mixed nerve with motor and sensory components, which could compromise functional outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine how the procedure will impact a patient's gait cycle.

Conclusion: Clinical application is needed to determine preliminary outcomes before widespread utilization of this technique.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股骨到坐骨神经转移:一项尸体研究。
背景:近端坐骨神经损伤是治疗的一个挑战,因为供体神经的选择有限,再生所需的距离长。方法:在我们的尸体研究中,我们旨在评估将坐骨神经胫骨和腓总成分转移到股神经股内侧肌(VM)和股外侧肌运动分支的可行性,而不需要插入神经移植。前暴露股神经VM和外侧支。坐骨神经向后暴露,穿过大收肌内和股骨内侧的狭窄窗口。然后将坐骨神经分离成胫骨和腓神经成分,然后覆盖到股神经的VM和外侧运动分支。结果:利用坐骨神经的整个胫骨和腓神经成分,我们能够获得更长的长度,并直接覆盖股神经分支,而无需使用间置移植物。该技术的缺点是缝合有运动和感觉成分的混合神经,这可能会损害功能结果。需要进一步的研究来确定手术将如何影响患者的步态周期。结论:在广泛应用该技术之前,需要临床应用来确定初步效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intradural posterior bony spur causing tethered cord syndrome without split cord malformation: A rare caudal developmental variant. Acute-phase bypass surgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysm: Selection criteria in the endovascular era. Accuracy of catheter placement in ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery with optical navigation: A retrospective comparative study. Mortality rates in patients with Parkinson's disease: An analysis of the Global Burden of Disease database. Endoscopic microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm associated with an enlarged jugular tubercle: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1