Advocating for patient safety: Power dynamics in nurse advocacy practice in Australia—An integrative review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Collegian Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.colegn.2025.01.003
Alan Ramsay , Peter Hartin , Kris McBain-Rigg , Melanie Birks
{"title":"Advocating for patient safety: Power dynamics in nurse advocacy practice in Australia—An integrative review","authors":"Alan Ramsay ,&nbsp;Peter Hartin ,&nbsp;Kris McBain-Rigg ,&nbsp;Melanie Birks","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Nurses play a vital role in advocating for patient safety, yet their ability to fulfil this role is influenced by the power dynamics within healthcare systems. Understanding the relationship between power and nurse advocacy in Australia is essential to fostering a supportive environment for effective advocacy.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This integrative literature review aims to identify and examine the relationship between power and the advocacy role of nurses in Australia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The review followed an integrative literature review design, guided by the approach outlined by Toronto and Remington. A comprehensive search was conducted in electronic databases such as Medline, CINAHL, Emcare, Scopus, ProQuest Health &amp; Medicine, and Informit. The search terms used were ‘nurse OR nursing OR nurses’ AND ‘advocacy OR whistleblowing’ AND ‘Australia.’ A total of 2507 articles were retrieved, and 26 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 18 qualitative studies, one quantitative study, one mixed-method study, one review of existing literature, and four editorial commentaries. The search was completed in May 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The findings suggest that enhancing nurses’ advocacy for patient safety requires a multifaceted approach. This includes empowering nurses through professional development and leadership opportunities, fostering a culture of patient safety, and engaging in political action to advocate for policies that support advocacy efforts and patient safety. This approach aims to advance patient well-being and elevate the professional standing of nurses within the healthcare system.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Power dynamics significantly shape nurse advocacy practices. Nurses with greater personal power are more likely to advocate confidently, while those with less power may be hesitant. Healthcare organisations can either support or hinder advocacy efforts, with unsupportive systems creating barriers and fostering a culture of silence. Whistleblowing, as a form of advocacy for patient safety, is also affected by organisational culture and power structures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Power dynamics play a critical role in determining how effectively nurses can advocate for patient safety. Empowering nurses and addressing organisational barriers are crucial for promoting advocacy in healthcare. This review highlights the need for healthcare systems to cultivate environments that support and facilitate nurse advocacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"32 2","pages":"Pages 84-99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769625000113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Nurses play a vital role in advocating for patient safety, yet their ability to fulfil this role is influenced by the power dynamics within healthcare systems. Understanding the relationship between power and nurse advocacy in Australia is essential to fostering a supportive environment for effective advocacy.

Aim

This integrative literature review aims to identify and examine the relationship between power and the advocacy role of nurses in Australia.

Methods

The review followed an integrative literature review design, guided by the approach outlined by Toronto and Remington. A comprehensive search was conducted in electronic databases such as Medline, CINAHL, Emcare, Scopus, ProQuest Health & Medicine, and Informit. The search terms used were ‘nurse OR nursing OR nurses’ AND ‘advocacy OR whistleblowing’ AND ‘Australia.’ A total of 2507 articles were retrieved, and 26 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 18 qualitative studies, one quantitative study, one mixed-method study, one review of existing literature, and four editorial commentaries. The search was completed in May 2023.

Findings

The findings suggest that enhancing nurses’ advocacy for patient safety requires a multifaceted approach. This includes empowering nurses through professional development and leadership opportunities, fostering a culture of patient safety, and engaging in political action to advocate for policies that support advocacy efforts and patient safety. This approach aims to advance patient well-being and elevate the professional standing of nurses within the healthcare system.

Discussion

Power dynamics significantly shape nurse advocacy practices. Nurses with greater personal power are more likely to advocate confidently, while those with less power may be hesitant. Healthcare organisations can either support or hinder advocacy efforts, with unsupportive systems creating barriers and fostering a culture of silence. Whistleblowing, as a form of advocacy for patient safety, is also affected by organisational culture and power structures.

Conclusion

Power dynamics play a critical role in determining how effectively nurses can advocate for patient safety. Empowering nurses and addressing organisational barriers are crucial for promoting advocacy in healthcare. This review highlights the need for healthcare systems to cultivate environments that support and facilitate nurse advocacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Music therapy in intensive care: Family perspectives on humanising care Graduate nurses’ experience of support, training, and education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study A realist-informed exploration of factors influencing nurses’ management of mental state deterioration in acute hospital settings Advocating for patient safety: Power dynamics in nurse advocacy practice in Australia—An integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1