Cross-Verification and validation of steady-state OPAL research reactor neutronic models using OpenMC and MCNP5 Codes: A foundation for advanced coupled simulations

IF 2.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Annals of Nuclear Energy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111324
Djahid Lababsa , Hakim Mazrou , Djalal Hamed , Abdelkader Aouaichia , Hamza Hasnaoui
{"title":"Cross-Verification and validation of steady-state OPAL research reactor neutronic models using OpenMC and MCNP5 Codes: A foundation for advanced coupled simulations","authors":"Djahid Lababsa ,&nbsp;Hakim Mazrou ,&nbsp;Djalal Hamed ,&nbsp;Abdelkader Aouaichia ,&nbsp;Hamza Hasnaoui","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study develops, verifies, and validates high-fidelity steady-state neutronic models of the OPAL research reactor using OpenMC and MCNP5. The models were developed based on a consistent methodology, utilizing identical input data, geometric modeling, and cross-section libraries, minimizing discrepancies from external factors, ensuring a solid foundation for subsequent code-to-code comparisons.</div><div>Verification and validation were conducted through comparisons with results from SERPENT and MCNP6, as well as experimental data. Our results showed strong agreement with the experimental data, including control rod worth calculations within 3% and axial peak factor differences averaging 2% for MCNP5 and 3% for OpenMC. Differences in isothermal temperature and void coefficients were approximately 1 pcm/°C and 7 pcm/%, respectively. Deviations from SERPENT and MCNP6 for few key parameters were within acceptable limits, consistent with reference studies, and attributed to variations in modeling, code differences, and Monte Carlo statistical uncertainties.</div><div>Finally, a comprehensive code-to-code comparison of key neutronic parameters, such as reactivity, flux distributions, kinetic parameters, and power distribution, showed excellent agreement between OpenMC and MCNP5, with relative differences under 1% for most parameters.</div><div>Overall, this study confirms the reliability of the developed models for simulating the OPAL reactor and establishes OpenMC as a viable alternative to MCNP for reactor physics simulations, laying the foundation for future coupling with thermal–hydraulic models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 111324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925001410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study develops, verifies, and validates high-fidelity steady-state neutronic models of the OPAL research reactor using OpenMC and MCNP5. The models were developed based on a consistent methodology, utilizing identical input data, geometric modeling, and cross-section libraries, minimizing discrepancies from external factors, ensuring a solid foundation for subsequent code-to-code comparisons.
Verification and validation were conducted through comparisons with results from SERPENT and MCNP6, as well as experimental data. Our results showed strong agreement with the experimental data, including control rod worth calculations within 3% and axial peak factor differences averaging 2% for MCNP5 and 3% for OpenMC. Differences in isothermal temperature and void coefficients were approximately 1 pcm/°C and 7 pcm/%, respectively. Deviations from SERPENT and MCNP6 for few key parameters were within acceptable limits, consistent with reference studies, and attributed to variations in modeling, code differences, and Monte Carlo statistical uncertainties.
Finally, a comprehensive code-to-code comparison of key neutronic parameters, such as reactivity, flux distributions, kinetic parameters, and power distribution, showed excellent agreement between OpenMC and MCNP5, with relative differences under 1% for most parameters.
Overall, this study confirms the reliability of the developed models for simulating the OPAL reactor and establishes OpenMC as a viable alternative to MCNP for reactor physics simulations, laying the foundation for future coupling with thermal–hydraulic models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用OpenMC和MCNP5代码对稳态OPAL研究堆中子模型进行交叉验证和验证:先进耦合模拟的基础
本研究利用OpenMC和MCNP5开发、验证和验证了OPAL研究堆的高保真稳态中子模型。这些模型是基于一致的方法开发的,利用相同的输入数据、几何建模和横截面库,最大限度地减少了外部因素的差异,确保了后续代码对代码比较的坚实基础。通过与SERPENT和MCNP6的结果对比以及实验数据进行验证和验证。我们的结果与实验数据非常吻合,包括控制棒价值计算在3%以内,MCNP5和OpenMC的轴向峰因子差异平均为2%和3%。等温温度和空隙系数的差异分别约为1 pcm/°C和7 pcm/%。一些关键参数与SERPENT和MCNP6的偏差在可接受范围内,与参考研究一致,并归因于建模、代码差异和蒙特卡罗统计不确定性的变化。最后,对关键中子参数(如反应性、通量分布、动力学参数和功率分布)进行了全面的码间比较,结果表明OpenMC和MCNP5之间的一致性非常好,大多数参数的相对差异在1%以下。总体而言,本研究证实了所开发模型用于模拟OPAL反应堆的可靠性,并确立了OpenMC作为反应堆物理模拟MCNP的可行替代方案,为未来与热压模型的耦合奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Annals of Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
21.10%
发文量
632
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic modeling of the control rod drop problem considering changes of structure and flow channel Development of a module to generate delayed photon data in ACE format within nuclear data processing code NECP-Atlas Numerical simulation of indoor radon transport and evaluation of ventilation strategies for mitigation efficiency Comments on the origin and structure of bunching-induced correlations in Feynman-α analysis J.M. Seiler’s major contributions to the understanding and modeling of corium – ceramic and concrete interactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1