Impact of quantitative flow ratio on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart and Vessels Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1007/s00380-025-02532-8
Takuya Tsujimura, Takayuki Ishihara, Taku Toyoshima, Naoko Higashino, Sho Nakao, Yosuke Hata, Masaya Kusuda, Masaharu Masuda, Yasuhiro Matsuda, Toshiaki Mano
{"title":"Impact of quantitative flow ratio on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion.","authors":"Takuya Tsujimura, Takayuki Ishihara, Taku Toyoshima, Naoko Higashino, Sho Nakao, Yosuke Hata, Masaya Kusuda, Masaharu Masuda, Yasuhiro Matsuda, Toshiaki Mano","doi":"10.1007/s00380-025-02532-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The clinical implication of a post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) quantitative flow ratio (QFR) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains insufficiently explored. This single-center retrospective observational study analyzed 195 CTO lesions from 195 CAD patients who underwent successful PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation and were assessed for post-PCI QFR. The primary end point was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 3 years. The receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to calculate the optimal cutoff value of post-PCI QFR for predicting 3-year TLR. Patients were stratified on the basis of the optimal cutoff value, and the predictors for 3-year TLR were assessed by multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. The ROC curve demonstrated that the cutoff value of post-PCI QFR for predicting 3-year TLR was 0.84, with a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 66%. The cumulative incidence of TLR at 3 years was significantly higher in the low post-PCI QFR group (≤ 0.84) compared to the high post-PCI QFR group (> 0.84) (22.0% versus 8.4%, P = 0.017). In multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 0.94 [0.91 to 0.98]), renal failure on dialysis (HR, 3.89 [1.58 to 9.55]), ostial lesion (HR, 5.01 [1.90 to 13.23]), and post-PCI QFR ≤ 0.84 (HR, 2.49 [1.04 to 5.97]) were independent predictors for 3-year TLR. Lower post-PCI QFR was associated with increased 3-year TLR in CAD patients with CTO.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":" ","pages":"778-788"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-025-02532-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The clinical implication of a post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) quantitative flow ratio (QFR) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains insufficiently explored. This single-center retrospective observational study analyzed 195 CTO lesions from 195 CAD patients who underwent successful PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation and were assessed for post-PCI QFR. The primary end point was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 3 years. The receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to calculate the optimal cutoff value of post-PCI QFR for predicting 3-year TLR. Patients were stratified on the basis of the optimal cutoff value, and the predictors for 3-year TLR were assessed by multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. The ROC curve demonstrated that the cutoff value of post-PCI QFR for predicting 3-year TLR was 0.84, with a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 66%. The cumulative incidence of TLR at 3 years was significantly higher in the low post-PCI QFR group (≤ 0.84) compared to the high post-PCI QFR group (> 0.84) (22.0% versus 8.4%, P = 0.017). In multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 0.94 [0.91 to 0.98]), renal failure on dialysis (HR, 3.89 [1.58 to 9.55]), ostial lesion (HR, 5.01 [1.90 to 13.23]), and post-PCI QFR ≤ 0.84 (HR, 2.49 [1.04 to 5.97]) were independent predictors for 3-year TLR. Lower post-PCI QFR was associated with increased 3-year TLR in CAD patients with CTO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定量血流比对慢性全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后疗效的影响。
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后定量血流比(QFR)在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)慢性全闭塞(CTO)患者中的临床意义仍未充分探讨。这项单中心回顾性观察性研究分析了195例CAD患者的195个CTO病变,这些患者成功接受了PCI药物洗脱支架植入术,并评估了PCI后的QFR。主要终点是3年时的靶病变血运重建术(TLR)。采用患者工作特征曲线计算pci后QFR预测3年TLR的最佳截止值。根据最佳截断值对患者进行分层,并采用多变量Cox比例风险模型评估3年TLR的预测因素。ROC曲线显示pci后QFR预测3年TLR的临界值为0.84,敏感性为61%,特异性为66%。低pci后QFR组3年TLR累积发生率(≤0.84)明显高于高pci后QFR组(0.84)(22.0% vs 8.4%, P = 0.017)。在多因素分析中,年龄(风险比[HR], 0.94[0.91 ~ 0.98])、透析肾衰(风险比[HR], 3.89[1.58 ~ 9.55])、口部病变(风险比,5.01[1.90 ~ 13.23])、pci后QFR≤0.84(风险比,2.49[1.04 ~ 5.97])是3年TLR的独立预测因素。冠心病合并CTO患者pci后较低的QFR与3年TLR升高相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart and Vessels
Heart and Vessels 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
211
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Impact of right bundle branch block in anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the contemporary primary PCI era. Prognostic impact of preoperative liver function on outcomes in patients undergoing Impella® implantation. Reply to "Epicardial adipose tissue in atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation: A bystander or participant?" Beyond the scale: reconciling the obesity paradox in the oldest heart failure patients. Response to "beyond the scale: reconciling the obesity paradox in the oldest heart failure patients".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1