Combination of intrarectal heated lidocaine gel and periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Investigative and Clinical Urology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.4111/icu.20240312
Jung Im Kim, Dong Wan Sohn, Bong Hee Park
{"title":"Combination of intrarectal heated lidocaine gel and periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized trial.","authors":"Jung Im Kim, Dong Wan Sohn, Bong Hee Park","doi":"10.4111/icu.20240312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the role of combined periprostatic nerve block (PNB) and intrarectal local anesthesia with heated lidocaine gel (ILAHL) in reducing pain during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy, compared with PNB alone.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a prospective randomized trial with 140 participants who underwent systematic TRUS-guided, 12-core prostate biopsy from July 2021 to June 2022. These participants were divided into two groups. Before prostate biopsy, group 1 (n=70) received PNB and group 2 (n=70) received PNB combined intrarectal local anesthesia with 20 mL of heated (40℃) 2% lidocaine gel. The primary outcome was pain score on a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) at four time points (VAS A: during local anesthesia procedure, VAS B: during probe insertion, VAS C: during biopsy procedure, VAS D: 30 minutes after biopsy). The secondary outcome included adverse events during and after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean pain scores were significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1 at VAS A (2.53 vs. 1.60, p=0.001) and VAS B (2.47 vs. 1.49, p<0.001). The mean VAS C pain score in group 2 was significantly less than in group 1 (3.07 vs. 2.20, p=0.001), while there was no significant difference in the mean VAS D pain score between two groups (1.06 vs. 0.89, p=0.318). There were no significant differences in the occurrence of complications in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of PNB and ILAHL provides more effective pain control than PNB alone without increase of complication rates in patients undergoing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14522,"journal":{"name":"Investigative and Clinical Urology","volume":"66 2","pages":"130-136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative and Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20240312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the role of combined periprostatic nerve block (PNB) and intrarectal local anesthesia with heated lidocaine gel (ILAHL) in reducing pain during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy, compared with PNB alone.

Materials and methods: We performed a prospective randomized trial with 140 participants who underwent systematic TRUS-guided, 12-core prostate biopsy from July 2021 to June 2022. These participants were divided into two groups. Before prostate biopsy, group 1 (n=70) received PNB and group 2 (n=70) received PNB combined intrarectal local anesthesia with 20 mL of heated (40℃) 2% lidocaine gel. The primary outcome was pain score on a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) at four time points (VAS A: during local anesthesia procedure, VAS B: during probe insertion, VAS C: during biopsy procedure, VAS D: 30 minutes after biopsy). The secondary outcome included adverse events during and after the procedure.

Results: Mean pain scores were significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1 at VAS A (2.53 vs. 1.60, p=0.001) and VAS B (2.47 vs. 1.49, p<0.001). The mean VAS C pain score in group 2 was significantly less than in group 1 (3.07 vs. 2.20, p=0.001), while there was no significant difference in the mean VAS D pain score between two groups (1.06 vs. 0.89, p=0.318). There were no significant differences in the occurrence of complications in both groups.

Conclusions: The combination of PNB and ILAHL provides more effective pain control than PNB alone without increase of complication rates in patients undergoing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:研究经直肠超声(TRUS)引导的前列腺活检过程中,前列腺周围神经阻滞(PNB)和加热利多卡因凝胶直肠内局部麻醉(ILAHL)联合使用与单独使用PNB相比在减轻疼痛方面的作用:我们进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,在2021年7月至2022年6月期间对140名参与者进行了系统的TRUS引导下12核前列腺活检。这些参与者被分为两组。前列腺活检前,第一组(70 人)接受 PNB,第二组(70 人)接受 PNB 联合直肠内局部麻醉,20 毫升加热(40℃)的 2% 利多卡因凝胶。主要结果是四个时间点(VAS A:局部麻醉过程中;VAS B:插入探针过程中;VAS C:活检过程中;VAS D:活检后 30 分钟)的 0-10 视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分。次要结果包括术中和术后的不良反应:结果:在 VAS A(2.53 对 1.60,P=0.001)和 VAS B(2.47 对 1.49,P=0.001)方面,第 2 组的平均疼痛评分明显低于第 1 组:在接受TRUS引导前列腺活检的患者中,联合使用PNB和ILAHL比单独使用PNB能更有效地控制疼痛,且不会增加并发症的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative and Clinical Urology (Investig Clin Urol, ICUrology) is an international, peer-reviewed, platinum open access journal published bimonthly. ICUrology aims to provide outstanding scientific and clinical research articles, that will advance knowledge and understanding of urological diseases and current therapeutic treatments. ICUrology publishes Original Articles, Rapid Communications, Review Articles, Special Articles, Innovations in Urology, Editorials, and Letters to the Editor, with a focus on the following areas of expertise: • Precision Medicine in Urology • Urological Oncology • Robotics/Laparoscopy • Endourology/Urolithiasis • Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction • Female Urology • Sexual Dysfunction/Infertility • Infection/Inflammation • Reconstruction/Transplantation • Geriatric Urology • Pediatric Urology • Basic/Translational Research One of the notable features of ICUrology is the application of multimedia platforms facilitating easy-to-access online video clips of newly developed surgical techniques from the journal''s website, by a QR (quick response) code located in the article, or via YouTube. ICUrology provides current and highly relevant knowledge to a broad audience at the cutting edge of urological research and clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Carbon footprints in the urologic field: From diagnosis to surgery. Changes in urologic research from a new perspective: Text mining analysis of publication topics. Combination of intrarectal heated lidocaine gel and periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized trial. Comparative efficacy and safety of energy coagulation in radiation-induced hemorrhagic cystitis: A narrative review. Comparison of encrustation between silicon-covered and polytetrafluoroethylene-covered metallic stent, in vitro experimental study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1