Management of dropped head syndrome: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1007/s10143-025-03443-y
Matheus Felipe Henriques Brandão, Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves, Gabriel de Almeida Monteiro, Vitor Ribeiro Gonçalves, João Vitor Andrade Fernandes, Thiago Gomes Martins
{"title":"Management of dropped head syndrome: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.","authors":"Matheus Felipe Henriques Brandão, Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves, Gabriel de Almeida Monteiro, Vitor Ribeiro Gonçalves, João Vitor Andrade Fernandes, Thiago Gomes Martins","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03443-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dropped Head Syndrome (DHS) is a rare condition marked by severe neck extensor muscle weakness, leading to a chin-on-chest deformity caused by pathological kyphosis. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of conservative versus surgical treatments for DHS. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect was conducted for studies on DHS treatments. Outcomes included total/partial improvement, success, and failure rates. Statistical analyses were performed using R software and the \"meta\" package. We identified 1,252 articles, with 19 studies and 472 patients included. Of these, 134 (28.4%) underwent surgery and 338 (71.6%) received conservative treatment. Partial improvement after conservative treatment was 59% (95% CI 32.76-83.03%; I² = 78%), with total improvement at 4.45% (95% CI 0.01-13.21%; I² = 84%). Success rates were 6.73% (95% CI 0.74-16.16%; I² = 82%), and failure was 100% (95% CI 99.28-100%; I² = 78%). For surgical treatment, total improvement was 100% (95% CI 99.57-100%; I² = 18%), and success was also 100% (95% CI 98.37-100%; I² = 0%), with low heterogeneity. Only two surgical patients failed (95% CI 0.00-1.63%; I² = 0%). Conservative treatment was ineffective in achieving functional recovery and horizontal gaze. Surgical treatment is the preferred option for treating DHS and should be considered a disease-modifying therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03443-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dropped Head Syndrome (DHS) is a rare condition marked by severe neck extensor muscle weakness, leading to a chin-on-chest deformity caused by pathological kyphosis. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of conservative versus surgical treatments for DHS. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect was conducted for studies on DHS treatments. Outcomes included total/partial improvement, success, and failure rates. Statistical analyses were performed using R software and the "meta" package. We identified 1,252 articles, with 19 studies and 472 patients included. Of these, 134 (28.4%) underwent surgery and 338 (71.6%) received conservative treatment. Partial improvement after conservative treatment was 59% (95% CI 32.76-83.03%; I² = 78%), with total improvement at 4.45% (95% CI 0.01-13.21%; I² = 84%). Success rates were 6.73% (95% CI 0.74-16.16%; I² = 82%), and failure was 100% (95% CI 99.28-100%; I² = 78%). For surgical treatment, total improvement was 100% (95% CI 99.57-100%; I² = 18%), and success was also 100% (95% CI 98.37-100%; I² = 0%), with low heterogeneity. Only two surgical patients failed (95% CI 0.00-1.63%; I² = 0%). Conservative treatment was ineffective in achieving functional recovery and horizontal gaze. Surgical treatment is the preferred option for treating DHS and should be considered a disease-modifying therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
掉头综合征的治疗:系统回顾和单臂荟萃分析。
低垂头综合征(DHS)是一种罕见的病症,其特征是严重的颈部伸肌无力,导致病理性后凸引起的下巴胸部畸形。本研究旨在评估保守与手术治疗DHS的疗效。对PubMed、Embase和ScienceDirect进行了系统搜索,以获取DHS治疗的研究。结果包括全部/部分改善、成功率和失败率。统计分析使用R软件和“meta”包进行。我们纳入了1252篇文章,包括19项研究和472名患者。其中,134例(28.4%)接受手术治疗,338例(71.6%)接受保守治疗。保守治疗后部分改善59% (95% CI 32.76-83.03%;I²= 78%),总改善率为4.45% (95% CI 0.01-13.21%;I²= 84%)。成功率为6.73% (95% CI 0.74-16.16%;I²= 82%),失败率为100% (95% CI 99.28-100%;I²= 78%)。对于手术治疗,总改善为100% (95% CI 99.57-100%;I²= 18%),成功率也为100% (95% CI 98.37-100%;I²= 0%),异质性较低。只有2例手术失败(95% CI 0.00-1.63%;I²= 0%)。保守治疗在功能恢复和水平凝视方面无效。手术治疗是治疗DHS的首选选择,应被视为一种疾病改善疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Intraoperative radiotherapy for brain metastases after surgical resection a systematic review and meta-analysis. Postoperative seizure, stroke, hemorrhage, and cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome rates in adult patients with moyamoya disease undergoing revascularization: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis. A systematic review with meta-analysis of the olfactory fossa anatomy: Implications for anterior skull base approaches. Prevalence of persistent falcine sinus: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of 5,457 subjects. Risk factors to guide Terson syndrome screening after aneurysmal subarachnoid Hemorrhage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1