Surgical risk of CSF leakage following endoscopic transorbital approach for anterior and middle skull base pathologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1007/s10143-025-03426-z
Sergio Corvino, Jacopo Berardinelli, Giuseppe Corazzelli, Roberto Altieri, Iacopo Dallan, Francesco Corrivetti, Matteo de Notaris
{"title":"Surgical risk of CSF leakage following endoscopic transorbital approach for anterior and middle skull base pathologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sergio Corvino, Jacopo Berardinelli, Giuseppe Corazzelli, Roberto Altieri, Iacopo Dallan, Francesco Corrivetti, Matteo de Notaris","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03426-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The endoscopic superior eyelid transorbital approach (SETOA) has demonstrated considerable versatility and effectiveness in managing various paramedian anterior and middle skull base pathologies. However, as with any relatively new technique, potential complications remain. We conducted an extensive literature search in MEDLINE and Embase in accordance with PRISMA guidelines including case reports and surgical series reporting cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rate following SETOA for intracranial pathologies. Factors analyzed included lesion location (extra- or intra-axial), reconstruction techniques, and complication management. ROBINS-I tool was employed to assess the risk of bias. Twenty-five studies including 240 cases were eligible. The majority of lesions were intradural extra-axial (68.3%), while trigeminal schwannomas comprised all extradural cases (25.0%). Sixteen patients (6.6%) presented intradural intra-axial tumors. Osteodural reconstruction involved dural substitutes in one third of the cases (32.5%) either alone (14.2%) or combined with fat free graft (18.3%). CSF leak occurred in 6 patients (2.50%), mostly resolving via conservative management (66.6%). The risk of postoperative CSF leak was found to be significantly higher in patients undergoing resection for intra-axial tumors (OR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.04-0.49) compared to those undergoing resection for extra-axial (OR 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.02; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%; p < 0.001). Key limitations include the retrospective nature and small sample sizes among included studies as well as data heterogeneity and lack of standardized protocols for reconstruction across studies. SETOA appears safe for addressing selected extradural and intradural skull base pathologies with a low postoperative CSF leak rate. The natural repositioning of the orbital content to its original position may be instrumental in preventing its postoperative occurrence. The investigation followed a prespecified protocol registered on PROSPERO (PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024614111).</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"282"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03426-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The endoscopic superior eyelid transorbital approach (SETOA) has demonstrated considerable versatility and effectiveness in managing various paramedian anterior and middle skull base pathologies. However, as with any relatively new technique, potential complications remain. We conducted an extensive literature search in MEDLINE and Embase in accordance with PRISMA guidelines including case reports and surgical series reporting cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rate following SETOA for intracranial pathologies. Factors analyzed included lesion location (extra- or intra-axial), reconstruction techniques, and complication management. ROBINS-I tool was employed to assess the risk of bias. Twenty-five studies including 240 cases were eligible. The majority of lesions were intradural extra-axial (68.3%), while trigeminal schwannomas comprised all extradural cases (25.0%). Sixteen patients (6.6%) presented intradural intra-axial tumors. Osteodural reconstruction involved dural substitutes in one third of the cases (32.5%) either alone (14.2%) or combined with fat free graft (18.3%). CSF leak occurred in 6 patients (2.50%), mostly resolving via conservative management (66.6%). The risk of postoperative CSF leak was found to be significantly higher in patients undergoing resection for intra-axial tumors (OR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.04-0.49) compared to those undergoing resection for extra-axial (OR 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.02; I2 = 0%; p < 0.001). Key limitations include the retrospective nature and small sample sizes among included studies as well as data heterogeneity and lack of standardized protocols for reconstruction across studies. SETOA appears safe for addressing selected extradural and intradural skull base pathologies with a low postoperative CSF leak rate. The natural repositioning of the orbital content to its original position may be instrumental in preventing its postoperative occurrence. The investigation followed a prespecified protocol registered on PROSPERO (PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024614111).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内窥镜经眶入路治疗前中颅底病变后 CSF 渗漏的手术风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
经鼻内窥镜下上睑经眶入路(SETOA)在处理各种旁脉前、中颅底病变方面显示出相当的多功能性和有效性。然而,与任何相对较新的技术一样,潜在的并发症仍然存在。根据PRISMA指南,我们在MEDLINE和Embase进行了广泛的文献检索,包括病例报告和手术系列报告颅内病变SETOA后脑脊液(CSF)泄漏率。分析的因素包括病变位置(轴外或轴内)、重建技术和并发症处理。采用ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。25项研究包括240例符合条件。大多数病变发生在硬膜内轴外(68.3%),而三叉神经鞘瘤包括所有硬膜外病例(25.0%)。16例(6.6%)表现为硬膜内轴内肿瘤。三分之一(32.5%)的病例采用硬脑膜替代物进行骨硬膜重建,单独(14.2%)或联合无脂移植(18.3%)。发生脑脊液漏6例(2.50%),多数经保守治疗(66.6%)。行轴内肿瘤切除术的患者术后脑脊液漏的风险明显高于行轴外肿瘤切除术的患者(OR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.04-0.49) (OR 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.02;I2 = 0%;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Full-endoscopic lumbar spine discectomy: in search of the optimal approach-a meta-analysis comparing interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) and transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD). Endoscopic endonasal treatment of Meckel's cave epidermoid cysts: case series and systematic review. Endovascular treatment of basilar apex aneurysms: A bi-institutional case series and exploratory pulsatile computational fluid dynamic analysis. The beneficial effects of clazosentan on the perioperative management of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Retraction Note: Proton beam therapy for skull base chordomas: a systematic review of tumor control rates and survival rates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1