Socioeconomic associations of amblyopia in the All of Us research program

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Aapos Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaapos.2025.104160
Rachel Zhang , Jasmine Jeon MS , Steven Ness MD
{"title":"Socioeconomic associations of amblyopia in the All of Us research program","authors":"Rachel Zhang ,&nbsp;Jasmine Jeon MS ,&nbsp;Steven Ness MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaapos.2025.104160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To identify potential socioeconomic associations of amblyopia in a nationwide cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective, case-control study of participants in the <em>All of Us</em> Research Program. Cases were defined as adults 18-64 years of age with a diagnosis of amblyopia who answered the “Basics” survey questions of interest. Age-, sex-, and race-matched controls with no amblyopia diagnosis were sampled at a 4:1 control-to-case ratio. Univariate and multivariable testing was performed to determine socioeconomic associations of amblyopia, with <em>P</em> values of &lt;0.05 considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1,714 patients with a diagnosis of amblyopia, 859 fell within the defined age range. Amblyopic participants were more likely to be of Black or African American (25.8% vs 21.8% [<em>P</em> = 0.004]) or Hispanic race/ethnicity (25.6% vs 22.6% [<em>P</em> = 0.04]) and were significantly older (50.0 vs 46.6 years [<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001]) than unmatched controls. After applying additional inclusion criteria limiting analysis to those with socioeconomic data available, a restricted set of 601 amblyopic participants were compared to 2,404 age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-matched controls. Comparing cases and matched controls, participants with a diagnosis of amblyopia were significantly more likely to be unemployed (47.8% vs 39.3% [<em>P</em> = 0.0002]), non-home-owners (61.4% vs 55.8 % [<em>P</em> = 0.01]), have Medicaid insurance (33.8% vs 26.2% [<em>P</em> = 0.0002]), or have a household income under $35,000 annually (50.2% vs. 43.2% [<em>P</em> = 0.002]). Multivariable analysis revealed that amblyopic participants were significantly more likely to be unemployed (OR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.25-1.94; <em>P</em> = 0.00006) and more likely to have Medicaid insurance (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.13-1.82; <em>P</em> = 0.003).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There are potential long-term socioeconomic associations of amblyopia. Given reported differences in both screening rates and treatment outcomes based on race, ethnicity, and income level, it is vital that future studies adequately portray the diversity of the population through broad, representative recruitment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aapos","volume":"29 2","pages":"Article 104160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aapos","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091853125000588","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To identify potential socioeconomic associations of amblyopia in a nationwide cohort.

Methods

This is a retrospective, case-control study of participants in the All of Us Research Program. Cases were defined as adults 18-64 years of age with a diagnosis of amblyopia who answered the “Basics” survey questions of interest. Age-, sex-, and race-matched controls with no amblyopia diagnosis were sampled at a 4:1 control-to-case ratio. Univariate and multivariable testing was performed to determine socioeconomic associations of amblyopia, with P values of <0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

Of 1,714 patients with a diagnosis of amblyopia, 859 fell within the defined age range. Amblyopic participants were more likely to be of Black or African American (25.8% vs 21.8% [P = 0.004]) or Hispanic race/ethnicity (25.6% vs 22.6% [P = 0.04]) and were significantly older (50.0 vs 46.6 years [P < 0.0001]) than unmatched controls. After applying additional inclusion criteria limiting analysis to those with socioeconomic data available, a restricted set of 601 amblyopic participants were compared to 2,404 age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-matched controls. Comparing cases and matched controls, participants with a diagnosis of amblyopia were significantly more likely to be unemployed (47.8% vs 39.3% [P = 0.0002]), non-home-owners (61.4% vs 55.8 % [P = 0.01]), have Medicaid insurance (33.8% vs 26.2% [P = 0.0002]), or have a household income under $35,000 annually (50.2% vs. 43.2% [P = 0.002]). Multivariable analysis revealed that amblyopic participants were significantly more likely to be unemployed (OR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.25-1.94; P = 0.00006) and more likely to have Medicaid insurance (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.13-1.82; P = 0.003).

Conclusions

There are potential long-term socioeconomic associations of amblyopia. Given reported differences in both screening rates and treatment outcomes based on race, ethnicity, and income level, it is vital that future studies adequately portray the diversity of the population through broad, representative recruitment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全民研究计划中弱视与社会经济的关系。
目的:在全国范围内的队列中确定弱视的潜在社会经济关联。方法:这是一项回顾性的病例对照研究,研究对象是“我们所有人”研究项目的参与者。病例被定义为18-64岁的成年人,诊断为弱视,并回答了感兴趣的“基础”调查问题。年龄、性别和种族匹配的无弱视诊断的对照组按4:1的对照病例比取样。通过单变量和多变量检验来确定弱视的社会经济关联,结果的P值为:在1714名诊断为弱视的患者中,859名患者在定义的年龄范围内。弱视参与者更有可能是黑人或非裔美国人(25.8%对21.8% [P = 0.004])或西班牙裔种族(25.6%对22.6% [P = 0.04]),并且明显比未匹配的对照组年龄大(50.0对46.6岁[P < 0.0001])。在应用额外的纳入标准限制分析那些具有社会经济数据的人之后,将601名弱视参与者与2404名年龄、性别和种族/民族匹配的对照组进行比较。对比病例和对照,弱视患者失业(47.8%比39.3% [P = 0.0002])、无房(61.4%比55.8% [P = 0.01])、有医疗补助保险(33.8%比26.2% [P = 0.0002])或家庭年收入低于35000美元(50.2%比43.2% [P = 0.002])的可能性明显更高。多变量分析显示,弱视参与者更有可能失业(OR = 1.56;95% ci, 1.25-1.94;P = 0.00006),更有可能有医疗补助保险(OR = 1.43;95% ci, 1.13-1.82;P = 0.003)。结论:弱视存在潜在的长期社会经济关联。考虑到基于种族、民族和收入水平的筛查率和治疗结果的差异,未来的研究必须通过广泛、有代表性的招募来充分代表人口的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Aapos
Journal of Aapos 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Journal of AAPOS presents expert information on children''s eye diseases and on strabismus as it affects all age groups. Major articles by leading experts in the field cover clinical and investigative studies, treatments, case reports, surgical techniques, descriptions of instrumentation, current concept reviews, and new diagnostic techniques. The Journal is the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.
期刊最新文献
Response to Comments on 'Risk factors for capsular phimosis following congenital cataract extraction'. Risk factors for capsular phimosis following congenital cataract extraction. REPLY. Utility, safety, and accessibility of phone call follow-up in strabismus surgery postoperative care. Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1