Detection Ability of Quality of Life Changes and Responsiveness of the KOQUSS-40 and the EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 in Patients Who Underwent Gastrectomy: A Prospective Comparative Study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.4143/crt.2024.1104
Bang Wool Eom, Keun Won Ryu, Ji Yeong An, Yun-Suhk Suh, In Cho, Sung Geun Kim, Ji-Ho Park, Hoon Hur, Hyung-Ho Kim, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Sun-Hwi Hwang, Hong Man Yoon, Ki Bum Park, Hyoung-Il Kim, In-Gyu Kwon, Han-Kwang Yang, Byoung-Jo Suh, Sang-Ho Jeong, Tae-Han Kim, Oh Kyoung Kwon, Hye-Seong Ahn, Ji Yeon Park, Ki Young Yoon, Myoung Won Son, Seong-Ho Kong, Young-Gil Son, Geum Jong Song, Jong Hyuk Yun, Jung-Min Bae, Do Joong Park, Sol Lee, Jun-Young Yang, Kyung Won Seo, You-Jin Jang, So Hyun Kang, Joongyub Lee, Hyuk-Joon Lee
{"title":"Detection Ability of Quality of Life Changes and Responsiveness of the KOQUSS-40 and the EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 in Patients Who Underwent Gastrectomy: A Prospective Comparative Study.","authors":"Bang Wool Eom, Keun Won Ryu, Ji Yeong An, Yun-Suhk Suh, In Cho, Sung Geun Kim, Ji-Ho Park, Hoon Hur, Hyung-Ho Kim, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Sun-Hwi Hwang, Hong Man Yoon, Ki Bum Park, Hyoung-Il Kim, In-Gyu Kwon, Han-Kwang Yang, Byoung-Jo Suh, Sang-Ho Jeong, Tae-Han Kim, Oh Kyoung Kwon, Hye-Seong Ahn, Ji Yeon Park, Ki Young Yoon, Myoung Won Son, Seong-Ho Kong, Young-Gil Son, Geum Jong Song, Jong Hyuk Yun, Jung-Min Bae, Do Joong Park, Sol Lee, Jun-Young Yang, Kyung Won Seo, You-Jin Jang, So Hyun Kang, Joongyub Lee, Hyuk-Joon Lee","doi":"10.4143/crt.2024.1104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the detection ability of quality of life (QoL) changes and responsiveness of the KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS)-40 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate QoL changes after various gastrectomies between January 2021 and April 2022. Participants were instructed to complete the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. QoL changes over time and QoL responsiveness were assessed for each questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 491 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer at 22 institutions were analyzed. The summary scores of the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-STO22 showed significant differences between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.044 and p=0.038, respectively), but no difference was observed for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Dysphagia on the KOQUSS-40 was significantly different between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.031); however, dysphagia on the EORTC QLQ-STO22 did not differ. The responsiveness of the KOQUSS-40 was similar to that of the EORTC QLQ in patients who experienced ≥ 10% body weight loss, but approximately 10% less in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy than the EORTC QLQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KOQUSS-40 has several advantages over EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 when comparing QoL between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups. The findings provide information for researchers investigating the QoL of patients who have undergone curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":49094,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"221-231"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12800933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.1104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the detection ability of quality of life (QoL) changes and responsiveness of the KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS)-40 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ).

Materials and methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate QoL changes after various gastrectomies between January 2021 and April 2022. Participants were instructed to complete the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. QoL changes over time and QoL responsiveness were assessed for each questionnaire.

Results: Data from 491 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer at 22 institutions were analyzed. The summary scores of the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-STO22 showed significant differences between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.044 and p=0.038, respectively), but no difference was observed for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Dysphagia on the KOQUSS-40 was significantly different between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.031); however, dysphagia on the EORTC QLQ-STO22 did not differ. The responsiveness of the KOQUSS-40 was similar to that of the EORTC QLQ in patients who experienced ≥ 10% body weight loss, but approximately 10% less in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy than the EORTC QLQ.

Conclusion: KOQUSS-40 has several advantages over EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 when comparing QoL between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups. The findings provide information for researchers investigating the QoL of patients who have undergone curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
koqus -40与EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22在胃切除术患者生活质量变化检测能力及反应性的前瞻性比较研究
目的:比较韩国胃癌患者生活质量研究组(KOQUSS)-40和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ)对生活质量(QoL)变化的检测能力和反应性。材料与方法:通过多中心前瞻性观察研究,评估2021年1月至2022年4月期间各种胃切除术后生活质量的变化。要求受试者在术前和术后1、3、6、12个月完成KOQUSS-40和EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22。评估每个问卷的生活质量随时间的变化和生活质量响应性。结果:对22所医院491例胃癌根治性胃切除术患者的资料进行了分析。koqus -40和EORTC QLQ-STO22的综合评分在全胃切除术组和近端胃切除术组之间差异有统计学意义(p分别为0.044和0.038),而EORTC QLQ-C30之间差异无统计学意义。全胃组和近端胃切除术组的KOQUSS-40评分差异有统计学意义(p=0.044);然而,在EORTC QLQ-STO22上,吞咽困难没有差异。在体重减轻≥10%的患者中,koqus -40的反应性与EORTC QLQ相似,但在接受辅助化疗的患者中,koqus -40的反应性比EORTC QLQ低约10%。结论:KOQUSS-40比EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22在比较全胃组和近端胃切除术组的生活质量方面具有优势。这一发现为研究人员调查接受根治性胃切除术的胃癌患者的生活质量提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
126
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Research and Treatment is a peer-reviewed open access publication of the Korean Cancer Association. It is published quarterly, one volume per year. Abbreviated title is Cancer Res Treat. It accepts manuscripts relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research. Subjects include carcinogenesis, tumor biology, molecular oncology, cancer genetics, tumor immunology, epidemiology, predictive markers and cancer prevention, pathology, cancer diagnosis, screening and therapies including chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, gene therapy, multimodality treatment and palliative care.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Radiation Pneumonitis Through Functional Lung Imaging: A Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)-Based Approach in Lung Cancer. Korean Practical Guidelines for Geriatric Assessment and Management of Older Adults with Cancer: A Korean Cancer Association Guideline for Geriatric Oncology. A Novel Classification of Esophageal Anastomotic Leaks and Its Impact on Healing Time After Esophagogastrostomy. Associations between Smoking, Opioid Analgesic Use, and Risk For Chemical Coping in Korean Patients with Advanced Cancer. Postoperative Radiotherapy May Improve Survival in Certain Patients with pN2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Do Not Have Extranodal Extension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1